Following is the list of candidate forums hosted by the League of Women Voters Diablo Valley for the Nov. 5, 2024, elections.
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, District 5 –Tuesday, Sept. 10, 4:30-5:30 pm, IBEW Union Hall, Martinez. District 5 includes portions of Antioch and Antioch District 2 Councilman Mike Barbanica is facing off against Pittsburg Councilwoman Shanell Scales Preston.
State Senate District 9 – Sunday, Sept. 15, 2:00-3:00 pm, Danville Women’s Club, Alamo. Senate District 9 includes all of Antioch and Assemblyman Tim Grayson is facing off against San Ramon City Councilwoman Marisol Rubio.
By Gayle Murray, League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley
Confused about the ballot propositions? Want to learn quickly about them in depth and through a non-partisan lens? Join a Community Conversations webinar on Thursday, September 26 at 4 p.m.
Janet Hoy and Sue Brandy of the League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley will give the Pros And Cons positions of the propositions on your ballot based on the League’s research. The moderators will present information about major funding sources supporting the propositions and answer your questions about both the initiatives and the legislative measures on the upcoming California ballot.
The Contra Costa County Library will provide closed captioning and simultaneous Spanish interpretation for this event. The program will be recorded and uploaded to the Library’s YouTube channel after the event.
Information on how to access the Zoom webinar will be sent to your email address 24 hours before the program. Audience questions will be collected and answered through the Zoom Q&A tab.
Community Conversations are sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley, the League of Women Voters of West Contra Costa County, the Contra Costa County Library and Contra Costa TV.
Antioch City Clerk Ellie Householder (left) approved the use by District 2 Council candidate Dominique King (center) of the title “Educator” in her ballot designation but her opponent, former Antioch High Principal Louie Rocha couldn’t. Herald file photos.
Dominique King, who isn’t a teacher allowed to use term, but retired Antioch High principal Louie Rocha can’t
Antioch City Clerk Ellie Householder says, “Educator does not mean teacher,” in spite of the dictionary definition to the contrary. Uses her own.
By Allen D. Payton
According to the definition found in the Merriam-Webster dictionary online, the word “educator” means “one skilled in teaching : teacher”, “a student of the theory and practice of education” or “an administrator in education.” Yet, the term was allowed as one of the three titles in the ballot designation for one candidate for Antioch City Council in District 3 who isn’t a teacher and doesn’t have a four-year college degree or a teacher’s credential. But it wasn’t allowed for a retired principal who spent most of his career in education and continues to fill in as a substitute principal, including for a week, later this month.
But City Clerk Ellie Householder approved the use of the term by Dominique King, in her first run for city council against retired Antioch High School principal, Louie Rocha, who is also running for city council for the first time. The City Clerk said, “Educator does not mean teacher,” and later explained her reasoning. King claims she educates people through her and her husband’s business, which is how she also uses the title “Businesswoman”.
10-Day Public Review Period of Candidate Ballot Designations
Candidates and anyone can challenge another candidate’s ballot designations during a 10-day public review period following the close of filing. But it takes legal action and a judge’s decision in court to force a change. No challenge to King’s designation was made by Rocha or anyone else.
As previously reported, about the three titles she used in her ballot designation of “Businesswoman / Educator / Consultant” King said, “My ballot designation was reviewed and approved. I trust that if I had not met the necessary requirements during the local and county election review process, my designation would have been rejected.” But she refused to say where she teaches or how she can use the title of “Educator”.
Rocha Told He Can’t Use “Educator” in Ballot Designation Because He’s Retired andPrimary Source of Income is His Pension
Candidates can offer three options for their ballot designations. Rocha offered all three, but the first one, “Retired Antioch High School Principal” was more than three words. So, the County Elections Division staff rejected it and called him about it. He also offered “Retired Principal/Educator” but that was rejected by the City Clerk’s Office because he’s retired, even though Rocha says he continues to fill in at schools periodically, as a substitute principal, referred to as an “itinerant”.They settled on Rocha’s third choice of simply, “Retired Principal.”
“After I retired, what’s pretty common, is if we will be available to serve as substitute principals,” he explained. “I’ve worked the last two years as a substitute principal at all levels including at Bidwell High School for a week, later this month.”
Rocha shared with the Herald a copy of the email sent to him by Householder about his ballot designation explaining why he couldn’t use the term “Educator.”
On Aug 1, 2024, at 3:57 PM, Ellie Householder <ehouseholder@antiochca.gov> wrote:
“Good afternoon Mr. Rocha,
I hope you are doing well.
Our office received a call today from Jacob (Stull), Supervisor at Contra Costa County Elections Division, regarding your Ballot Designation.
Jacob said that your proposed ballot designation has more than 3 words “Retired Antioch High School Principal.” The 1st alternate ballot designation listed “Retired Principal/Educator”; Educator is not your current position as you stated that you are retired, and your main source of income is your pension.
Jacob did approve your second alternate ballot designation as “Retired Principal.” I simply wanted to share this information with you.
Thank you. Have a great week.
Best wishes,
Ellie Householder, MPP
Antioch City Clerk | Elections Official”
——————————–
Questions for Householder, Staff
An email was sent to City Clerk Ellie Householder and her staff on Friday night, Aug. 23, 2024, asking, how is it that Dominique King can use the ballot designation of “Businesswoman, Educator, Consultant” even though she isn’t a teacher, doesn’t have a four-year college degree nor a teaching credential, yet, her opponent, Louie Rocha can’t use the same term of ‘Educator’, even though he has been in education for most of his career.
They were also provided with a section from the press release announcing King’s campaign which describes her work as follows: “For the last seven years, King has volunteered and supported Antioch families through educational advocacy by helping families with children who need additional educational support, including children with special needs.” The city clerk and staff were then asked why Mrs. King wasn’t required to use the term, “educational advocate” which more accurately describes what she does rather than “Educator”. Finally, they were asked if King had told them that she works as a teacher, and if so, did she tell them where she teaches.
Householder responded on Tuesday, Aug. 27 writing, “Louie stated that he is in fact a Retired Principal and his main source of income was his pension. ‘Educator’ was also included in his ballot designation. Unfortunately, we were notified by the Elections Supervisor Jacob (after submitting Louie’s candidate paperwork), that ‘Educator’ was not permissible as Louie is retired.”
So, even though, since he retired, Rocha has been hired periodically as an interim assistant principal and fills in for teachers in the classroom in AUSD schools, which would mean he continues to work as an educator, because it’s not his primary source of income, he can’t use the title of educator.
“For Dominique, a part of her primary profession includes educating, which she explains in her ballot designation worksheet. Educator does not mean teacher,” Householder continued. “When our office reviewed this following the California Code of Regulations – Elections Code, we found that her designation was acceptable, since it is a part of her primary source of income.
Jacob also advised that their office would review and approve the requested candidate nomination paperwork submitted.”
While King wouldn’t explain to the Herald how she’s an educator or where she teaches, on the website for her and her husband’s business it reads, “Lean in with the Kings is family owned and operated. LIWTK mission is to educate couples and families on how to foster healthy relationships through 1. Utilizing health and wellness. 2. Enlisting the help of professionals 3. Openly speaking from our experiences. 4. Building a supportive and informative community.”
Asked why he denied Rocha’s use of the term “Educator” but approved King’s, Stull said, “The City Clerk is the determining factor for approving ballot designation. The original one was ‘Retired Antioch High School Principal’. But that was too many words. He could say he is a retired principal or retired school principal. We were trying to work with them, the City Clerk’s office.”
Asked if he had seen Rocha’s request for the designation to be “Retired/Principal/Educator,” Stull said, “No. In this case, when we spoke on the phone it was a length issue. We didn’t have the Ballot Designation Worksheet.”
“Alternate 1 was Retired Principal/Educator. You can’t use a retired designation and current designation,” the Elections Supervisor continued. “His Alternate 2 was Retired Principal and that’s what the City Clerk’s Office approved.”
“We reached out to the City Clerk about Rocha’s designation because it exceeded the word limit,” he explained.
“I don’t have Ms. King’s Ballot Designation Worksheet,” Stull stated. “The City sent me the Declaration of Candidacy, which is a form the City and County have. On the form in section 2 you put the name you want printed on the ballot. Ms. King turned in all of that with the city clerk’s office. I don’t have the justification for what that designation she requested. I don’t know if she explained educator differently. I have to go with what the City provided us, Ms. King’s three professions, occupations or vocations.”
Asked how she can use both titles of “Businesswoman” and “Educator” if the educating is done through her business and how the term educator does not mean teacher he said, “I don’t know if there are definitions within the Elections Code to define terms.” A review shows there isn’t a definition for “educator” in the state Elections Code.
The Declaration of Candidacy is not a public document and the City Clerk’s Office staff would not provide it following a request by the Herald.
County Elections Division Sides with the City on Ballot Designations
“It’s supposed to be your principal profession, occupation or vocation, a maximum of three words separated by slashes,” Stull explained. “We have to qualify the candidate, but the final say is with the City, and we side with the City. They’re the filing official. We will provide guidance when needed.”
“We reached out to Rocha because his designation was too long. King’s was fine,” he added.
Additional Questions for City Clerk, Staff
Under the California Code of Regulations Title 2. Administration Division 7. Secretary of State Chapter 7. Ballot Designations in subsection 20716 Unacceptable Ballot Designations it reads, “The following types of activities are distinguished from professions, vocations and occupations and are not acceptable as ballot designations pursuant to Elections Code Section 13107, subdivision (a)(3):
Avocations: An avocation is a casual or occasional activity, diversion or hobby pursued principally for enjoyment and in addition to the candidate’s principal profession, vocation or occupation. Avocations may include, but are not limited to, hobbies, social activities, volunteer work (except as set forth in Section 20714.5 of this Chapter), and matters pursued as an amateur.
Householder and the City Clerk’s staff were then asked additional questions, including regarding what she wrote in her response about King. They were asked what “is a part of her primary source of income” that refers to teaching, and if it is through her and her husband’s “Lean In With the Kings” business. While on their website it reads, “LIWTK mission is to educate couples and families on how to foster healthy relationships,” even if that’s the basis for the approval of King’s use of the term in her ballot designation, how can she use both titles of Businesswoman and Educator if the educating is done through her business, and shouldn’t it be one or the other, Householder and staff were also asked.
Since King hasn’t said if her position as Chief Information Officer for the Oscar Grant Foundation is a paid or volunteer position, and if the latter, it would mean it’s not her profession, vocation or occupation, as is the requirement in the California Code of Regulations for Ballot Designations – Ballot Designations :: California Secretary of State, the City Clerk and staff were asked if that was the position to which King’s title of “Educator” applies.
Householder was specifically asked, since when does the term educator not mean teacher and where she obtained that definition. She was informed that it’s not defined in the State Code of Regulations and that the dictionary definition according to Merriam-Webster is clear that it means “teacher”.
The City Clerk was asked what definition she is using and the source for that definition.
Finally, Householder and her staff were asked if King is a volunteer educational advocate, a part-time columnist for the Clayton/Concord Pioneer, serves as the Chief Information Officer for the Oscar Grant Foundation (either for pay or as a volunteer) and doesn’t have a four-year degree in either education or counseling, then isn’t her work through her LIWTK business done as an amateur.
Dominique King’s Ballot Designation Worksheet pages 1 & 2. (Redactions in black by City Clerk’s Office. Further redactions in grey by the Herald). Source: Antioch City Clerk’s Office
Candidates Explain, Defend Use of Titles on Ballot Designation Worksheet, King Using Business for All Three Titles
Candidates must submit a Ballot Designation Worksheet with up to three options and justifications for each. After obtaining copies of both King’s and Rocha’s worksheets, which show King is using her “Lean in With the Kings” business as justification for all three ballot titles, more and pointed questions were then sent to Householder and City Clerk staff.
They were asked shouldn’t the different titles be for different jobs a candidate holds or businesses they own or must, or can, they all refer to the same occupation, vocation and profession.
Furthermore, they were informed that in the list of questions on the form that candidates are required to mark boxes next to “Yes” or “No” to and initialize, it reads under question “3. Use more than three total words for your principal professions, vocations, or occupations?”
Householder and her staff were asked, shouldn’t those three words describe three different professions, vocations or occupations and can a candidate use more than one title in their ballot designation to refer to the same profession, vocation or occupation.
King’s Ballot Designation worksheet offered three options including her Proposed option which she was granted, Alternate 1 of “Businesswoman/Consultant” and Alternate 2 of “Businesswoman/Educator”. Beneath the justification for each of the ballot designation options she wrote under “Current or most recent job title: Cofounder Owner Start Date: 2019, Employer Name or Business: Lean In With The Kings llc. Under the name of the “Person who can verify this information” she provided Kenneth King, her husband, as well as his phone number and personal email address. Under King’s second and third choices she merely wrote “Same As Above” for the latter information.
King’s Justification for use of her 1st PVO (profession(s), vocation(s), or occupation) reads, “I co-own this business with my husband. This is my primary source of income. Education make up a large percentage of daily operations. Consulting with client on initiatives & programs is a part of our business model.”
For the Justification for use of 2nd PVO, King wrote, “As a businesswoman consulting is a portion of how we shape initiatives & programs created when outsourcing with companies or organizations.” For the Justification for use of 3rd PVO she wrote, “Education is our focus in how to engage and empower personal, relational and communal relationships. Programs are structured and require planning and preparation.”
Then, for the Justifications for the use of her 1st, 2nd and 3rd PVO’s, even though she only offered two each for her Alternate ballot Designation 1 and 2 she repeatedly wrote, “Same As Above”.
On Rocha’s Ballot Designation Worksheet as Justification for the Proposed Ballot Designation of “Retired Antioch High School Principal”, under Justification for use of 1st PVO he wrote, “I was principal of Antioch High School, retired in 2022.” For the 2nd and 3rd PVO’s he didn’t write anything. Then for the Justification for the Alternate Ballot Designations 1 and 2, Rocha simply wrote, “Same as above.”
For the person who could verify the information, Rocha wrote, Stephanie Anello, who was Antioch Unified School District Superintendent at the time, and her then-district phone number and email address.
Louie Rocha’s Ballot Designation Worksheet pages 1 & 2. (Redactions by City Clerk’s Office). Source: Antioch City Clerk’s Office
Householder Explains Reasons for Approving King’s Use of Title “Educator”
Householder responded on Saturday, Aug. 31 writing, “In regards to your question about having multiple words to describe Mrs. King’s occupation, the simple answer is that Mrs. King is both a business owner and employed by the business. She explains this on her ballot designation worksheet, which you’ve seen.”
“Many people who own a business don’t work as employees of that business,” the City Clerk continued. “To use a generic example, someone owns a restaurant. Their ownership of that restaurant doesn’t mean they are also chefs. However, if they owned the restaurant and worked as a chef there, we would allow “business owner/chef” as their ballot designation. Mrs. King is both a co-owner and employee of Lean In With the Kings, which is the rationale for the multiple words to describe her profession.”
“In regards to your previous question about ‘educator’, as stated on her ballot designation, ‘Education is our focus in how to engage and empower personal, relational, and communal relationships. Programs are structured and require planning and preparation.’ I differentiate ‘teacher’ as someone with a credential and ‘educator’ as someone who educates, instructs, or coaches on a particular topic,” Householder explained.
“The ultimate goal when assessing a ballot designation is that it be true and accurate. Our office meets and extensively discusses this with candidates when navigating what designations are allowable under the Elections Code,” she added.
More Questions for Householder
However, on King’s Ballot Designation Worksheet she only provides the title of “Co-Founder/Owner” which she wrote three times and applies to her first ballot designation. Householder was then asked, what title as an employee for the business does King use for her “Educator” title.
Householder responded on Thursday, August 5th writing, “A part of the work she does at her organization does is educational. Hence, the title “educator.” She explains that under justification 3.” But that doesn’t provide her position as an employee. The city clerk was then asked on Friday, August 6th, what is King’s position as an employee of the company which is “educational” and since she didn’t provide her employee position, how can Householder make that argument.
But the city clerk did not respond prior to publication time.
Questions for King Go Unanswered
Regarding the justifications for the three titles in her approved ballot designation King was asked several questions for clarification in an email early Thursday evening, Sept. 5th. She was first asked why she didn’t share that it’s her business through which King claim to be an educator when she was asked how she’s a teacher and where does she teach that could have been included in the article about her candidacy.
Because her worksheet under Justification for use of 1st PVO only shows that they’re part of her business model, King was asked on what initiatives and programs for clients that she has consulted.
King was also asked, with what companies and organizations does her business outsource as mentioned in her Justification for use of 2nd PVO (“Educator”) and to provide a couple examples.
The District 2 council candidate was then asked if she meant “communial” instead of “communal” under the Justification for use of 3rd PVO (“Consultant”), because the latter word could not be found in online searches. She was also asked how the education portion of their business is conducted, if do they teach your clients from books, manuals, videos, etc., are they given homework which she reviews and/or tests which she grades
She had the justifications for the latter two ballot designation titles reversed on the worksheet.
Regarding Householder’s explanation of why King can use three different titles for the same business, the candidate was reminded that on her Ballot Designation Worksheet, King only provided the title of “Co-Founder/Owner” which she wrote three times and applies to her first ballot designation. King was then asked what title as an employee of the business does she use for her “Educator” title.
Lastly, King was asked, again, if her position with the Oscar Grant Foundation is paid or volunteer.
She did not respond by publication time on Friday, Sept. 6 at 6:00 p.m.
Please check back later for any updates to this report.
With support from elected and community leaders, unions and faculty
Representing portions of Antioch, Pittsburgand Brentwood and other East County communities
“My goal is to drive student success for the jobs of the future.” – Fernando Sandoval
East County community leader Fernando Sandoval announces his re-election candidacy for the Contra Costa Community College District Board of Trustees in Ward 5 with support from a strong list of elected officials, labor leaders and community members from throughout the district including: Contra Costa County Supervisor Federal Glover, Contra Costa County Supervisor Ken Carlson, Building and Construction Trades, Central Labor AFL-CIO and the United Faculty of the College District. They join a coalition of college faculty, staff, students, small business owners, civic leaders and community activists in support of Sandoval’s race.
Sandoval is completing his first term on the college board, after being elected in 2020 during his second and successful attempt to defeat then-incumbent Trustee Greg Enholm. Ward 5 includes portions of Antioch, Pittsburg and Brentwood and all of Oakley, Bay Point, Discovery Bay, Bethel Island, Byron and Knightsen. (See College District Wards map)
“Fernando Sandoval is a leader who has brought vision, bold leadership and a commitment to educational excellence and equity that will advance the academic opportunities for our students, said Yolanda Peña Mendrek, Liberty Union High School District Board President. She adds, in addition, his 30 years as a finance and banking consultant to top worldwide corporations will make him an experienced voice and strong ally with the Governing Board as it addresses the budget constraints by the State and the continued fiscal aftermath of the global pandemic.”
In 2022-23 Fernando served as President of the Governing Board. During his four-year tenure as Board Trustee, some of his accomplishments in this capacity included bringing in District leadership stability with the hiring of the permanent Chancellor, Mojdeh Mehdezadeh, and Presidents of Los Medanos College and Contra Costa College, restoring a relationship with John F. Kennedy-National University and leading DEI efforts most recently with an innovative model for enrollment with Diablo Valley College, Mount Diablo Unified School District and United Latino Voices.
Source: Contra Costa Community College District
He has also served as a past member of the Contra Costa Community College District Equal Employment Opportunity Advisory Committee (DEEOAC) to advise on a districtwide commitment to diversity, inclusion and equal employment opportunities in accordance with California Education Code, Title 5. He also Chaired the Bond Oversight Committee for modernization of schools at Pittsburg Unified School District (PUSD).
Sandoval’s community leadership also includes organizing mentoring, tutoring and motivational workshops for K-12 students and Los Medanos College students. He was recognized for his service by receiving the 2020 Cesar Chavez Award for Exemplary Community Service by Los Medanos College.
“I am running for the Contra Costa Community College District Board in my home region because I personally experienced the equity barriers and lack of mentorship for higher education access, particularly for underserved students which still exists today,” said Sandoval. “My goal is to drive student success for the jobs of the future. I want to bring my professional experiences, innovative spirit and commitment to educational excellence and equity to advance real solutions to these issues in collaboration with the Board and through community and philanthropic partnerships.”
The Ward 5 Trustee continued, “I am honored to have the support of educational leaders, local policy-makers and hard-working residents from throughout the East County community college district. We still face unprecedented challenges ahead due to the pandemic’s impact on the district’s budget combined with the long-term racial and social injustice issues facing our region and college district. It has never been more important to have experienced, principled, and responsive leadership now more than ever.”
Background
Sandoval was raised in East County by a hard-working immigrant family who sacrificed and encouraged education as a career pathway. Fernando is a veteran who served in the Vietnam War, where he maintained advanced computer systems on the USS Enterprise. Professionally he was recruited for information technology manager roles by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Sperry Rand, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, and managed change at IBM and General Electric among others. He also provided management strategies and policy decisions for economic recovery as a finance consultant to top banking institutions worldwide.
According to campaign finance reports known as Form 460’s, as of June 30th, former Antioch mayor Don Freitas had raised the most money of the three candidates running for city council in District 3, with a total of $5,055. But an additional $2,500 received on August 11th brings his total to $7,555 raised with all but $55 in the form of monetary contributions.
His report for the period of Jan. 1 through June 30, 2024, shows he raised $5,000 in monetary contributions including $2,000 from himself, all from within Antioch, and an additional $55 in non-monetary, referred to as an in-kind contribution, which were for fees he paid out of pocket to form his campaign committee and to the bank where its account is located.
The other contributions received were $2,000 from Susan Kennedy of Antioch, a Senior Policy Advisor in the U.S. House of Representatives and $1,000 from his campaign treasurer, Stephanie Bonham of Antioch, who is listed as retired.
Since the close of the reporting period, Freitas filed a Form 497 which shows he had received an additional $2,500 on Aug. 11 from GBN Partners of Danville, which stands for Ginocchio, Blackhawk, Nunn, land developers for the already approved Promenade projects north and south of Sand Creek Road. The Form 497 is required for state and local committees making or receiving contributions that total $1,000 or more in the 90 days before an election. It brings Freitas’ total to $7,500 raised for his campaign.
That compares to the $3,411 that second-time candidate Antwon Webster raised, which were all loans from himself, as previously reported, and $4,056.88 that was raised by the third candidate in the race, newcomer Addison Peterson. Of that amount $1,500 was an in-kind contribution from his wife for website design, $1,980 in loans, and $576.88 in monetary contributions. But Peterson did not provide details for the loans which were included in his Form 460 report for the period ending June 30th, as it appears there were received after. Questions about his campaign finance report were sent on Tuesday and await a response.
Freitas’ greatest expenditures were $1,500 to Carla Marymee of Antioch for website development and $450 to Mark Marymee of Fremont for photography. Asked why he didn’t use a photographer in Antioch, instead, the candidate responded, “He is Carla’s former husband, and they work together on the websites she develops. The business really is Carla’s, Rivertown Communications Marketing.”
Freitas’ original Form 460 showed a total of $2,063.18 in expenditures. But he submitted an Amended report a week later showing a corrected amount for total expenditures of $2,062.20, a reduction of $0.98 which was from a change in the cost for campaign checks paid to Travis Credit Union, where the committee’s account was opened. That left him with an Ending Cash Balance of $2,937.80 to spend on his campaign before the $2,500 contribution on August 11th. See Freitas’s Form 460 and Form 460 Amended.
The election is November 5th.
Please check back later for any updates to this report.
Announces endorsements of former State Superintendent Tom Torlakson, Contra Costa County Building and Construction Trades Council, local unions
Uses “Educator” title in approved ballot designation without 4-year college degree, teaching credential or saying where she teaches
By Allen D. Payton
After unsuccessfully seeking a seat on the Antioch School Board in 2022, this year, current Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Dominique King has switched to running for the Antioch City Council in District 2, instead. She both formed her committee and based it in San Jose, where her treasurer is located, and filed her intent to run last September, then King began raising funds in November. Launching without a public announcement other than on her campaign’s Facebook page, she held a campaign kickoff in May. King’s ballot designation is Businesswoman, Educator, Consultant and the campaign theme is “Moving Antioch Forward Together”.
However, while she is a volunteer educational advocate for families, King doesn’t have a four-year college degree or teaching credential, which are required to be a teacher in California, nor will say where she teaches. King also won’t say to what position she currently holds that the title of “Consultant” refers.
Asked why she switched her focus from education to city issues, King said, “While the responsibilities of the school board and city council differ, my life experiences, deep community involvement, professional background, and widely available data reveal the intrinsic connection between challenges in our educational system and broader societal issues such as public safety, housing instability, economic disparity, infrastructure challenges and the erosion of community connectedness. Addressing these interconnected problems is central to my daily work within the community. I am running for Antioch City Council, District 2, to address these challenges through collaboration, budget-consciousness, transparency, and an inclusive approach to move Antioch forward together.”
On Friday, Aug. 16, King’s campaign issued the following announcement of her major endorsements as well as other information about the candidate:
“Since her campaign kickoff in May, Dominique King has garnered broad support from across the city and the county that includes elected officials, community leaders, working families, advocates, and small business owners. King has also raised almost $25,000. With growing support from all sides of Antioch and the county, Dominique King is honored to officially announce the endorsements of former State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, former City of Antioch Chief of Police Steven Ford, Contra Costa County Building and Construction Trades Council, labor affiliates: IBEW Local 302, Boilermakers Local 549, Iron Workers Local 378, UA Plumbers, Steamfitters Local 159, SEIU-UHW and many more listed on her website.”
“I am pleased to endorse Dominique King for the Antioch City Council. She has a clear vision for our community combined with extensive positive energy,” said Torlakson. “She has a deep passion for public service and for helping our youth and families. Dominique’s leadership skills will help us greatly during these challenging times.”
The press release continued, “This endorsement from Torlakson, who started his public service on the dais of the Antioch City Council, shows the campaign is building strong momentum towards November.
“King’s priorities include public safety, economic growth, housing, infrastructure, and community engagement,” here announcement shared. “As a proactive and compassionate leader, she is committed to working tirelessly to create a safer, more equitable, and prosperous future for all members of the community.”
“Be a part of Moving Antioch Forward Together this November and join the movement!”
Community Service
“King currently serves as Chair of the Antioch Parks and Recreation Commission, where she has been busy taking on an array of issues, including working on the Rivertown Community Space, a project instrumental in beginning the efforts to revitalize the historic downtown area,” her campaign press release continued. “For the last seven years, King has volunteered and supported Antioch families through educational advocacy by helping families with children who need additional educational support, including children with special needs. She is also a board member for the Delta Learning Center in Antioch and established the first Antioch group of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.”
Education, Business and Work Experience, Family
Kenneth and Dominique King and children. Source: 6/16/24 post on King’s campaign Facebook page.
According to her LinkedIn profile, King earned an associate’s degree in psychology from Los Medanos College and since June 2022 has been Chief Information Officer for the Oscar Grant Foundation, the organization named for the young man shot and killed by BART Police on New Year’s Day 2009. King shared that she is his mother’s goddaughter. About the organization she shared, “The foundation operates in the East Bay and collaborates with other organizations throughout Contra Costa County.”
In addition, since 2019, King and her husband Kenneth, an Alameda County Deputy Sheriff, have owned Lean In With The Kings, in which their “mission is to educate couples and families on how to foster healthy relationships.” She also continues to write as a columnist for the Clayton and Concord Pioneer newspaper, which is how she lists herself on the campaign finance report. (See below)
King says she and her husband chose Antioch and its community to raise their three children including two currently in the Antioch Unified School District.
Questions Go Unanswered, Won’t Say How She’s Considered an Educator, Consultant
Kiing was asked how she is considered an educator, where she teaches without a four-year degree and a teaching credential, and where she performs the volunteer work mentioned in her campaign’s press release and if that’s done at the Delta Learning Center. She was also asked to which position on her LinkedIn profile does the title consultant refer.
Without answering the questions directly, King responded, “My ballot designation was reviewed and approved. I trust that if I had not met the necessary requirements during the local and county election review process, my designation would have been rejected. My role on the Delta Learning Center Board is distinct from my independent work as an educational advocate.”
King was asked again on Friday afternoon, Aug. 23, how she can be considered an “Educator” and where does she teach, since she doesn’t have a four-year degree nor a teaching credential, or if her teaching is done through the Lean in With the Kings business.
The dictionary definition was shared with her of, “a person who provides instruction or education; a teacher” and that the NEA has a Code of Ethics for Educators, which are for their members who are credentialed teachers. – Code of Ethics for Educators | NEA The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing has Educator Rules of Conduct and Responsibilities. www.ctc.ca.gov/credentials/rules-of-conduct
Finally, King was informed that according to EdSource.org to be a teacher in California and “To earn a preliminary teaching credential a teacher must have:
A bachelor’s degree.
Completed an accredited teacher preparation program.
Completed a course or passed a test on the provisions and principles of the U.S. Constitution.
Earned a recommendation from their teacher preparation program.”
So, while the use of the term for her ballot designation may have been approved, if she hasn’t done what is listed above isn’t it misleading to the voters.
King was also asked again about the major for her Associates degree from LMC, if she you changed it from International Business, as was included in the article about her 2022 campaign, to Psychology, as it shows on her LinkedIn profile, and if so, when did she change it and when did she earn her AA.
Finally, King was asked again on Friday, August 23rd which position on her LinkedIn profile refers to her ballot designation title of “Consultant”, if it’s a paid or volunteer position, and does it apply to what was written in her press release: “For the last seven years, King has volunteered and supported Antioch families through educational advocacy by helping families with children who need additional educational support, including children with special needs.” She was given one more opportunity late Sunday night, Aug. 25th to respond by noon, today, Monday, August 26th. But she did not respond prior to publication time at 5:55 p.m.
Campaign Finances Show Help from Husband, One Union, Business Owners, Activists, Politicians
Although her campaign claims to have raised $25,000, King’s Form 460 finance reports show she raised $5,342 last year and $12,683 for a total of $18,025. King’s largest contributors include $5,000 from her husband, $2,000 from International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) 302 Community Candidates PAC; $1,000 from political campaign consultant Melody Howe Weintraub of Lafayette, listed as the consultant, owner of Winning Results; $700 from Gigi Crowder of Antioch, listed as the Executive Director, National Alliance on Mental Illness Contra Costa and $500 from Best Consulting, LLC in Walnut Creek.
In addition, King received $350 from Antioch School Board Area 2 Trustee Dr. Jag Lathan, $250 from Brentwood Councilwoman Jovita Mendoza, $198 from Antioch Police Oversight Commissioner Harry Thurston, plus, $300 from Frank Sterling, $150 from Devin Williams and $125 from Patricia Granados all of whom speak regularly during public comments at most council meetings; and $100 each from Antioch Mayor Pro Tem Monica Wilson, former Antioch City Manager Cornelius “Con” Johnson and Antioch School Board Area 4 Trustee candidate Olga Smith. King also raised $2,535 in contributions of less than $100 and loaned her campaign $300.
Of the contributions of $100 or more, not including the funds from her husband and from the IBEW, totaling $8,160 as of June 30th, King received $3,836 or 47% from within Antioch and $4,324 or 53% from outside the city.
As of June 30th, King’s campaign had spent $7,893.84 leaving her with an Ending Cash Balance of $9,292.06. Most of her Payments Made were to businesses outside of Antioch and the largest expenses were $2,650 to Eldridge Political Partners in San Jose, of which President and Founder Jordan Eldridge is serving as her campaign treasurer; $2,500 to Iconic Strategies, Inc. of Hayward for consulting; $1,200 to Sumthing Antioch restaurant for a fundraiser, and $1,000 to Kingdom Graphix in Antioch.
Other than one minor mistake in the Per Election To Date total for the contributions from Jag Lathan, which doesn’t change the totals, King’s campaign finance reports are accurate and comply with legal disclosure requirements. She responded, “I will work with my campaign treasurer to review and either verify or correct the Per Election To Date total to accurately reflect a donor’s contribution.”
King was asked if she had raised an additional $7,000 since the end of June, if so, from whom were the major contributions received, if they were from some of the unions that have endorsed her, as well as for the amounts. Finally, she was asked to provide the names and amounts for contributions of $500 or more since June 30th.She responded, “Additional funds were raised, including contributions from personal funds, individual donors and endorsing unions.” See Form 460 reports for 0101-12312023 and 0101-063023.
As previously reported, King faces one opponent in the race, former Antioch High School principal Louie Rocha, whose mother is Antioch School Board Area 5 Trustee Mary Rocha. The election is November 5th.
Please check back later for any updates to this report.
Transform’s leader calls it “a tragic missed opportunity” and “major setback for our climate and transportation goals”; labels opponents who successfully challenged measure, “extremist anti-housing and anti-government activists”
“RM4 barely polled 54% before we even had a chance to open our mouths about it. Are 46% of the citizens of the Bay Area ‘extremist anti-housing and anti-government activists’?” – 20 Billion Reasons campaign opposition leader Gus Mattammal
By Allen D. Payton
In an email to supporters and an announcement this week, Jenn Guitart,Executive Director of Transform decried the removal of the $20 billion Bay Area housing measure from the November ballot and demonized those who successfully challenged it. According to polling commissioned by the Bay Area Housing Finance Authority which placed the measure on the ballot, they found that only 54% of likely voters supported the bond. That’s much lower than the 66.7% support of voters required for it to pass. (See related articles here and here)
Labeled “What It Means for Our Movement” Guitart’s email and identical announcement on the Transform’s website read:
On Wednesday morning, the Bay Area Housing Finance Authority (BAHFA) unanimously voted to remove Regional Measure 4 from the 2024 ballot. The measure would have raised $20 billion to alleviate the Bay Area’s housing and homelessness crisis. Unfortunately, the measure was scuttled in response to a series of eleventh-hour challenges by extremist anti-housing and anti-government activists. This is a tragic missed opportunity for voters to say yes to urgently needed affordable housing and homelessness funding.
This decision is heartbreaking for Transform and other housing advocates, and, more importantly, for the hundreds of thousands of people in our region who now must wait longer for the affordable housing and homelessness solutions Bay Area residents need and deserve.
The decision is also a major setback for our climate and transportation goals. By funding the construction of over 40,000 new affordable homes near transit, the measure would have reduced greenhouse gas emissions by over three million tons and spurred an additional five million transit trips per year.
While it is frustrating that a well-resourced group of naysayers halted progress on housing and homelessness this election, Transform and our partners will continue to build the necessary power to win big on these critical issues.
Looking Forward
All is not lost in the fight for affordable housing. Transform and our partners will be working hard to pass Prop 5 this November, which will lower the voter approval threshold for housing and public infrastructure bond measures (from a two-thirds vote) to 55%. This measure is critical to advancing future affordable housing bond measures across the state.
Beyond November, our region continues to face significant challenges, from the housing and homelessness crisis to a looming transit fiscal cliff. New regional funding measures for both transportation and affordable housing are urgently needed. Passing both measures in the coming years will take unprecedented collaboration, creativity, and courage.
Transform will play a leading role in both these efforts as we continue our work to empower communities of color, innovate solutions, and advocate for policies and funding — all with the aim of helping people thrive and averting climate disaster. And we will need supporters like you in this fight to build up the necessary resources, political will, and movement organizing to beat the anti-taxers in future election cycles.
In the meantime, get ready to vote yes on Prop 5 in November, and stay tuned for future calls to action in the fight for housing, transportation, and climate justice for our region.
Transform Executive Asked Why She Demonized Measure’s Opponents
Guitart was asked why she would demonize the opponents to the measure when it only polled at 54% support prior to it being placed on the ballot, which is much lower than the 2/3rds vote currently required and also less than the 55% threshold required for a future vote should Prop 5 pass. She was also asked if she’s claiming 46% of the public who opposed it in the poll are also “extremist anti-housing and anti-government activists” and isn’t she risking angering those who opposed the measure from the start, some of whose support will be needed for passage of a future ballot measure.
Guitart was then asked with such a low level of support, shouldn’t the measure have been revised before it was placed on the ballot in order to address some of the concerns of the opposition to ensure a better possibility of it passing.
She was also asked instead wouldn’t it be better if Transform worked with the opponents to try and find common ground or a ballot measure that will be less anathema to them for a possible future vote or to achieve her organization’s goals
Finally, Guitart was asked if she is willing to offer a public apology to the measure’s opponents, revise her public statement removing the swipes at them and tone down the divisive rhetoric.
However, in response Guitart shared that she is unable to respond right now due to a family issue but wrote, “I will pass your concerns on to our team.”
Ballot Measure Opponent Leader Responds
When asked about the swipes at the opponents made by Transform’s executive director, Gus Mattammal, the leader of the opposition campaign, 20 Billion Reasons, responded, “I have a couple of responses to that characterization:
1) 20 Billion Reasons comprised Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, and Independents – the entire political spectrum. And to be clear, Democrats were about half the group.
2) Almost everyone in the group has willingly voted for tax increases before, so it’s silly to label folks as ‘anti-tax’. If someone comes to you with an idea for a pizza with pickles, sardines, and mayonnaise, and you say ‘um, no thanks!’, does that make you anti-pizza? Or are you just anti- “this particular idea for pizza”?
No one in this group is against well-constructed policies to alleviate housing unaffordability. Unfortunately, nothing about Regional Measure 4 was ‘well-constructed policy’.
3) RM4 barely polled 54% before we even had a chance to open our mouths about it, and the polling was destined to only go down from there. That means 46% of the voters were against this from the beginning. Are 46% of the citizens of the Bay Area ‘extremist anti-housing and anti-government activists’? I’m a registered Republican, and I feel like our fortunes as a party would be very different here in the Bay Area if that were true.”
About Transform
Founded in 1997 as Bay Area Transportation and Land Use Coalition (BATLUC), according to the organization’s website, Transform works “with organizations, advocates, and community members for improved transportation and housing policies and funding. Together, we can invest in climate and equity, promote innovative transportation, support transportation shifts, and address climate-related housing issues.”
The group claims to have moved “the Overton window”, which isan approach to identifying the ideas that define the spectrum of acceptability of governmental policies that says politicians can act only within the acceptable range, “steadily toward equity and climate resilience.”
They, “envision vibrant neighborhoods, transformed by excellent, sustainable mobility options and affordable housing, where those historically impacted by racist disinvestment now have power and voice.”
For more information about Transform visit www.TransFormCA.org or call (510) 740-3150.
Source: Antwon Webster for Antioch City Council campaign
In District 3; offers “A Vision for a Brighter Antioch”
By Allen D. Payton
Antwon Webster officially announced his campaign for Antioch City Council in District 3 on Monday, August 12, 2024 to replace incumbent Lori Ogorchock who can’t run again since she was gerrymandered out and into District 4 by the mayor and council majority during redistricting in 2022. This is Webster’s second run for the city council having placed fourth out of the four candidates in the race. He faces two candidates this year.
Although he’s just now officially announcing, Webster filed his intent to run last October and formed his campaign committee last November and began loaning and spending funds soon after.
Following is the press release from Webster’s campaign announcing his entry into the race:
“As we approach the Antioch City Council election, we have a unique opportunity to shape the future of our community. Antwon Webster is that transformative leader ready to ignite a movement towards city improvements. With a background as a U.S. Air Force veteran and a dedicated public servant, Antwon embodies the hope and determination we need to create a better Antioch.”
His campaign offers a five-part platform:
“Thriving Local Economy – Antwon envisions bustling streets filled with thriving local businesses, where entrepreneurship flourishes and job opportunities abound. He is passionate about economic development and is dedicated to supporting local entrepreneurs through job fairs and initiatives that connect residents to meaningful employment, revitalizing the economy and fostering pride in the community.
Empowered Youth- Antwon imagines a future where youth are not just participants but leaders in shaping their community. By expanding youth engagement programs, he aims to provide mentorship and resources that inspire creativity and resilience, creating community centers alive with activities that empower young people to chase their dreams.
A Safer Antioch – He envisions a community where families feel safe, children can play freely, and elders can walk with confidence. Antwon advocates for safety initiatives that build strong, trusting relationships between residents and law enforcement, fostering unity and shared responsibility through vibrant neighborhood watch programs and community events.
Modern Infrastructure – Antwon is passionate about infrastructure improvement, advocating for parks, transportation, and community facilities that enhance quality of life. He envisions Antioch as a clean, inviting, and vibrant place where families can gather and enjoy its beautiful landscapes and amenities.
Building a Community That Grows and Thrives”
Webster has demonstrated a “commitment to serving his country and his community” his campaign announcement states. “Through his campaign, he seeks to ensure that the voices of Antioch residents are heard, and that the community thrives.”
He “possesses the knowledge and skills necessary for effective governance and community development,” and Webster’s announcement speaks of “His diverse professional background” with experience as a “project manager, design engineer, accountant, and electrician” and “business owner.”
Community Service
“In addition to his military and professional achievements, Antwon has taken on leadership roles within the community,” the announcement states.
“He is committed to enhancing public safety, fostering economic growth, and supporting youth programs in Antioch,” his campaign states. “His experiences have fueled his passion for public service, inspiring him to run for the Antioch City Council in District 3. Antwon aims to bring positive change and address key issues facing the city.”
Military Service, Education, Career Experience
His full name is Antwon Ramón Webster, Sr. and he is a U.S. Air Force veteran, having served a tour in Iraq and another in the United Arab Emirates from 2008 to 2010, in the global war on terrorism. He has earned a master’s degree in Public Administration and a bachelor’s in Global Supply Chain Management, both from DeVry University, according to his LinkedIn profile.
He owns 1st CLAS Manufacturing LLC based in Houston, TX. About the business Webster shared, “We’re focused on management consulting, engineering and general subcontracting.”
His campaign says, “Antwon possesses the knowledge and skills necessary for effective governance and community development” and his “extensive experience equips him to approach challenges with a well-rounded perspective and implement practical solutions” and “Antwon balances his professional aspirations with his roles as a husband” to Rika, who is serving as his campaign treasurer, “and father of five” children ages 6 to 21.
Discrepancies, Mistakes in Campaign Finances
Webster’s original campaign finance report Form 460 for the period Jan. 1 through June 30, 2024, shows he made personal loans to his committee totaling $3,320.46 and received $384 in Miscellaneous Increases to Cash of less than $100. He had $2,351.20 in campaign expenses. But the report also shows he started in the hole with a Beginning Cash Balance of negative $956.80. Yet, his original Form 460 for the 2024 campaign covering last year, shows he raised and spent no money.
Plus, Webster’s original final 460 report for his 2020 campaign, shows an Ending Cash Balance of $4,030.30, which should have been zero, as it was marked as the Termination Statement.
Also, the amounts on the Summary Page for this year’s 460 don’t match. Both columns for line 11 Total Expenditures Made and line 15 Cash Payments show three different amounts, but they should all match since it’s Webster’s first report of funds for this year’s campaign.
Webster Amends Reports
In response to questions about the discrepancies in his reports, Webster submitted Amended Form 460’s for the Termination Statement for his 2020 campaign and both of his reports for this year’s campaign, correcting the mistakes.
Webster’s Amended Form 460 Termination Statement for his 2020 campaign now shows he paid himself the remaining balance of $4,331.47 leaving an Ending Cash Balance of zero. His Amended report for last year now shows he loaned his campaign $1,500 and spent $1,093.66, leaving him with $406.34 to end the year and begin this year’s reporting. This year’s Amended report now shows a $60 contribution from himself and additional loans from Webster of $1,851 for a total of $3,531 that he’s loaned the campaign.
So far, he has spent $3,500.79 and his largest expense was for $956.80 to CA State in Long Beach for campaign mailers last year. This year Webster’s campaign paid $750 to Kingdom Graphix of Antioch for video ad service. As of June 30th, his campaign had an Ending Cash Balance of $394.20 to spend on his campaign.
Offers “A Vision for a Brighter Antioch”
“Together, we can move Antioch forward, creating a community that is proud of its homes, landscapes, businesses and leadership,” Webster stated. “Together let’s build a brighter Antioch—your voice matters, and your vote is the key to unlocking our community’s full potential!”
His campaign asks Antioch residents to “Join the Movement!” and claims “Antwon Webster is more than a candidate; he is a beacon of hope for Antioch. His unwavering commitment to listening to Antioch’s voices and addressing residents’ needs makes him the right choice for City Council.
Now is the time for Antioch residents to walk beside Antwon Webster. Let’s create a powerful wave of change that resonates throughout our neighborhoods, inspiring friends and neighbors to join us in building a safer, more vibrant, and prosperous community. Share Antwon’s vision, and let’s spread the message of hope and unity.”
One of Three Candidates in District 3
Webster will face two other candidates in the District 3 council race, including former Antioch Mayor and Councilman, and former Contra Costa Water District Board Member Don Freitas, and newcomer Addison Peterson. For more information about Webster’s campaign visit https://antwonwebster.com, email Antwon@AntwonWebster.com or call (925) 204-5482
