Victim was adult man in East County

One dead bird, five sentinel chickens test positive for virus, all in Oakley

By Contra Costa Health

A Contra Costa resident died this month from West Nile virus infection, underscoring the need for everyone in the county to take precautions against mosquito-borne illness.

The death of an adult man who lived in East County was reported to the county on July 16. It was the first West Nile virus-related death reported in Contra Costa since 2006.

“This is a tragedy, and we offer our deepest condolences to the family and loved ones for their loss.” said Dr. Meera Sreenivasan, deputy county health officer. “This death also reinforces how important it is to reduce risk of West Nile virus infection by reducing our exposure to mosquitos.”

Contra Costa Health’s (CCH) Communicable Disease Program is investigating the case and has not determined where the person became infected. To preserve medical privacy, CCH will not release further details about the case.

The Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector Contra District (District) has detected other recent evidence of the virus’s presence in East County. One dead bird and five sentinel chickens have tested positive for the virus in Contra Costa County, all located in Oakley. According to the Delaware Journal of Public Health, “Chickens serve as valuable sentinel animals since they are not effective amplifying hosts, and they develop a short and relatively low viremia compared to other bird species when infected by WNV.”

Certain birds can become infected with West Nile virus, and when a mosquito feeds on an infected bird, the mosquito can become infected. An infected mosquito can spread the virus to a human or other animal through a single bite. The infection can be dangerous to humans, with symptoms such as fever, headache, vomiting, or rash.

“We are deeply saddened by the loss of a Contra Costa County resident to West Nile virus,” said Paula Macedo, Ph.D., district general manager. “This tragic event serves as a stark reminder of the importance of protecting ourselves from mosquito bites and supporting community efforts to control mosquito populations.”

West Nile virus activity is typically higher during the summer months. To reduce the risk of mosquito bites, the District recommends using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency registered insect repellents with one of the following active ingredients:

• DEET
• Picaridin
• The repellent version of Oil of Lemon Eucalyptus
• IR3535

Always follow the instructions on the label when using insect repellent. Wearing long sleeves and pants when outdoors where mosquitoes are present, often at dawn and dusk, can reduce exposed skin and reduce the risk of mosquito bites. And dumping out any amount of standing water in front and backyards and scrubbing the inside of each container to remove mosquito eggs can also help lower the risk of mosquitoes.

The District provides public health services to Contra Costa County residents including a mosquito service of inspection and control upon request. Request a District service by phone at 925-685-9301 or online at www.contracostamosquito.com. Click on “I Want to” at the top of the webpage, then select “Request Services” from the drop-down menu.

Contra Costa County residents can help the District identify areas of potential WNV risk by reporting dead birds to the California Dead Bird Call Center by phone at 1-877-968-2473 or online at westnile.ca.gov. Dead birds are often the first sign of West Nile virus in a particular area. By reporting dead birds, residents provide the District with critical information that allows District employees to set mosquito traps near the site of the dead bird to look for infected mosquitoes. If those mosquitos are found, the District will take timely action to reduce the risk of mosquito-borne disease for neighboring residents.

Allen D. Payton contributed to this report.

A new government facility to better fit its environment

Includes new plaza, public law library

By Kristi Jourdan, PIO, Contra Costa County

County and city officials celebrated the grand opening of Contra Costa County’s new Administration Building Tuesday morning, July 9, 2024. Located on Pine Street in the heart of downtown Martinez, the three-story cutting-edge office administration building and civic plaza was unveiled on the historic grounds previously occupied by a taller, outdated office tower and a jail dating back to around 1902. Both were demolished to make way for the modern development including the County’s other new administration building across Escobar Street that houses the Board of Supervisors’ Chambers.

Speakers included Board Chair and District 5 Supervisor Federal Glover, District 1 Supervisor John Gioia, District 2 Supervisor Candace Andersen, District 3 Supervisor Diane Burgis and District 4 Supervisor Ken Carlson, Chief Assistant County Administrator Eric Angstadt and Martinez Mayor Brianne Zorn, and representatives of design firm Perkins & Will and Webcor Builders.

The new $65 million building replaced a programmatically obsolete and contextually out of scale office tower and showcases state-of-the-art architecture that harmonizes beautifully with the surrounding historic buildings. It also rejuvenates the public plaza formed by the vacation of a city street within the County administration campus. It embodies sustainability with on-site photovoltaics for high-performance energy use, responsibly sourced finishes, and low embodied carbon materials.

The development significantly enhances community space by adding a new public law library, ground-floor retail spaces, and a parking garage. The plaza also includes street improvements and an advanced stormwater system tailored to the site’s unique groundwater challenges and topography. Internally, the building acts as a hub for several County administrative departments, including the Public Defender, County Sheriff’s Civil Division and the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice, consolidating essential services under one roof to improve service delivery and enhance community interaction.

The new building marks a significant contribution to Contra Costa County, where modernity meets tradition and community service meets innovation.

Alexandra Pony of Pony Communications and Allen D. Payton contributed to this report.

In response to letter from Contra Costa DA sent earlier this year Civil Grand Jury issues report to Antioch Council on city staff leadership turnovers, vacancies, possible Brown Act violations

“Any similar meeting on matters concerning the city could subject council members to criminal liability.” – DA Becton, Deputy DA for Public Corruption Bolen

Barbanica calls for resignations of Hernandez-Thorpe, Wilson, Torres-Walker and reopening investigation

Mayor says they were “get-togethers, not meetings”

“This is betrayal to the community and to the people they work with on the council,” Councilman Mike Barbanica

“What I’m not going to do is get caught up in Barbanica’s nonsense,” – Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe

By Allen D. Payton

The Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury publicly released, on Tuesday, July 2, 2024, a report entitled, “Challenges Facing the City of Antioch.” It was sent with a cover letter to the council members on June 14 and includes three areas of concern including turnover in city leadership, city employee vacancies and “possible Brown Act (state open meeting law) violations by the Mayor and certain City Council members, as outlined in a letter to Antioch’s Acting City Manager from the Contra Costa District Attorney.”

While Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe denies the gatherings at his home attended by current Mayor Pro Tem Monica Wilson and District 1 Councilwoman Tamisha Torres-Walker were meetings at which city business was discussed, his former love interest, Lacy Ferguson, said she offered testimony to the DA’s Office and Grand Jury that the three did discuss redistricting of council districts.

The report also includes five recommendations, two with deadlines by Jan. 1, 2025. The cover letter signed by Grand Jury Foreperson Joanne Sarmento, copied to Acting City Manager Kwame Reed, requires a written response from the city council by Sept. 13, 2024.

The report reads, “Antioch is a dynamic and diverse city that faces a number of challenges. Among these challenges are:

1. Turnover in city leadership (six permanent or acting City Managers since 2013) which has resulted in an average tenure for Antioch City Managers that is less than half the state average (less than two years vs. 4.5-year average).

2. A city employee vacancy rate that is 4-times the national average (21.6% vs. 5.3%).

3. Possible Brown Act violations by the Mayor and certain City Council members, as outlined in a letter to Antioch’s Acting City Manager from the Contra Costa District Attorney (see Appendix A).”

Of the recommendations for the city council to follow, two are to be implemented immediately, one six months after the new city manager is hired, and two by next January 1st. The second recommendation is a reminder that city regulations preclude the mayor and council members “from having any direct authority to direct, supervise, hire or fire any city employee, other than the City Manager and City Attorney.”

Herald Publisher Participated in Grand Jury‘s Local Media Panel Discussion

For full disclosure, this reporter was one of three members of the media invited to meet with the Civil Grand Jury in June 2023, including Dan Borenstein of the East Bay Times and Tamara Steiner, publisher of the Concord/Clayton Pioneer. Issues regarding the hiring of the Antioch city manager and other matters were discussed and answers provided to questions from the jurors. However, it is unknown if anything discussed that day was used as a basis for the Grand Jury’s investigation or findings.

UPDATE: Asked if any of the input provided during the meeting with the local media panel was part of the basis for the Grand Jury’s investigation and report, new Foreperson Peter Appert responded, “As the deliberations and work of the Grand Jury are conducted in secret, we are unable to respond to your question. But thank you for your participation in Jury orientation last year.”

Letter from District Attorney, Deputy DA for Public Corruption Re: Private Meetings

That letter to Kwame Reed, sent on Jan. 3, 2024 (but incorrectly dated Jan. 3, 2023) and copied to City Attorney Thomas L. Smith and the Grand Jury was entitled, “RE: Alleged violations of the Brown Act by Antioch City Council members.”

DA Becton and Deputy District Attorney Steven Bolen, who was then in charge of public corruption, wrote, “The Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office was contacted earlier this year regarding alleged violations of the Brown Act by Antioch Mayor Thorpe, Antioch Councilmember Torres-Walker and Antioch Councilmember Wilson. Specifically, we were told that those three council members met in private to discuss matters within the council’s jurisdiction regarding the Public Works Department and the hiring of the City Engineer. Our investigation also led to an allegation that those three city officials met in private to discuss the redistricting of the city’s electoral map. The District Attorney’s Office reviewed these allegations and the applicable law and then interviewed potential witnesses to determine whether any Brown Act violations occurred.”

“The Brown Act… prohibits a majority of the members of a legislative body to develop a collective concurrence as to action to be taken on any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body unless such a meeting is open and public,” the letter continued. “…there is evidence that Mayor Thorpe and Councilmembers Torres-Walker and Wilson met at Mayor Thorpe’s home in 2022 and held discussions” and “Our investigation leads us to believe that Mayor Thorpe and Councilmembers Torres-Walker and Wilson did meet and may have developed a collective occurrence absent a public forum.”

The letter explained why there would be no action taken against the three councilmembers. It reads, “the District Attorney’s Office has serious concerns that non-compliance with the Brown Act may have occurred, however, there is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt intentional violations of the statute at this time.”

Instead, Becton and Bolen decided to inform Reed, “in order for you to impress upon the council the importance of the Brown Act and the requirements of the statute. Any similar meeting on matters concerning the city could subject council members to criminal liability.”

“As the Brown Act makes clear, the deliberations and actions of our governmental representatives must occur openly and be subject to public scrutiny,” the letter concludes.

They also said they sent the “letter to the Contra Costa County Grand Jury to provide that body the opportunity to take any action it may deem appropriate.” (See CCDA letter re Antioch City Council)

The Grand Jury responded five months later with their report.

Hernandez-Thorpe Admits Private Meetings With Two Councilwomen, Torres-Walker Doesn’t Deny It

In a March 28, 2024 article by The Mercury News/East Bay Times, Hernandez-Thorpe admitted to meeting privately with Wilson and Torres-Walker. The report reads, “As to whether or not he met with Torres-Walker and Wilson, Hernandez-Thorpe said that he had but not for a nefarious purpose.”

“’We coordinate campaigns and whatnot, because we’re Democrats. We’re together all the time,’ Hernandez-Thorpe said. He later added, ‘I think if they can demonstrate that we violated the Brown Act, we’re more than happy to take corrective action.’”

Torres-Walker didn’t deny the private meetings and saying, “that she had no problem with whoever tipped off the DA using the proper channels to voice their concerns,” the article further reported.

Grand Jury Report

The report shared multiple statistics supporting the concerns outlined and offered an explanation for issuing it.

“We concluded that the police force was receiving adequate attention from other investigative bodies…However, the Grand Jury learned that the issues surrounding the police force are related to other issues of oversight and management within city government. In particular, we noted the average tenure for Antioch City Managers has been less than half the California state average over the last decade (average City Manager tenure of less than 2 years in Antioch vs. 4.5 years for the state).”

Methodology

The report shares the steps taken by the Grand Jury to obtain their information:

• We interviewed government officials in Antioch and experts in city government practices
• and regulation.
• We reviewed press reports and other documents related to Antioch’s city government
• operations and performance.
• We reviewed recordings and transcripts of city council meetings.
• We reviewed city budgets for the past 20 years.
• We also reviewed documents related to city government best practices.

Discussion Points

The report then offered three main discussion points and 15 specific findings about the City of Antioch and its governance providing details for each. The discussion points matched the three challenges outlined in the report:

• Excessive City Manager Turnover is a Negative for Antioch;
• High Employee Vacancy Rates Negatively Impact City Services; and
• Brown Act Compliance

Findings

The report summarizes the findings by the Grand Jury investigation, as follows:

F1. Antioch’s City Manager has broad responsibility to ensure the efficient operation of the city, including supervision of an approximately $100 million general fund budget and an authorized staff of over 400 employees.

F2. The city began the process of recruiting a new permanent City Manager in January 2024. As of June 10, 2024, no hiring decision has been announced.

F3. As outlined in both the City Manager job description and in city recruitment materials, the City Manager position requires a qualified and experienced individual.

F4. There has been a lack of continuity in City Managers in Antioch, with six City Managers or Acting City Managers since December 2013.

F5. Under city ordinances the City Council, including the Mayor, has no direct authority to direct, supervise, hire, or fire any city employees, other than the City Manager and City Attorney (Ordinance 246-A).

F6. The Mayor and City Council members have on occasion overstepped their authority in seeking to make personnel decisions, including terminating the then Public Works Director in December 2022, in ways not permitted by city ordinance (Antioch City Code § 2-2.06 and § 2-2.10).

F7. The Mayor and City Council members have on occasion sought to conduct meetings with City Staff without the approval or involvement of the City Manager, as required by city ordinance (Antioch City Code § 2-2.10).

F8. Antioch’s city government had a 21.6% employee vacancy rate as of February 2024, roughly four-times the national average for government agencies.

F9. In the absence of a permanent City Manager since March 2023, the city has deferred hiring new department heads when openings occur.

F10. The Police, Public Works and Community Development departments currently are without permanent department heads.

F11. Seven of the eleven most senior positions in Antioch city government are currently held by acting or part-time personnel, including City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Directors of Community Development, Police Services, and Public Works (all acting) and the Directors of Economic Development and Recreation (both part-time).

F12. The employee vacancy rate is above the city-wide average in the Public Works Department (26% vacancy rate) and Community Development Department (35% vacancy rate), both of which currently do not have permanent directors.

F13. Recruitment and retention of staff has been impacted by the absence of a permanent City Manager and the lack of permanent department heads in multiple city departments.

F14. The Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office conducted an investigation into alleged Brown Act violations by Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe and Council Members Tamisha Torres-Walker and Monica Wilson, which was forwarded to the Grand Jury.

F15. The District Attorney’s Office noted serious concerns that noncompliance with the Brown Act may have occurred, however, there was insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt intentional violations of the statute occurred.

Grand Jury Recommendations

In the report, the Grand Jury also issued five recommendations, as follows:

R1. “The Mayor and City Council should follow through on the ongoing process of hiring an experienced and qualified City Manager.

R2. The Mayor and City Council should abide by city regulations (Antioch City Code § 2-2.06 and § 2-2.10) that preclude the Mayor and City Council from having any direct authority to direct, supervise, hire or fire any city employee, other than the City Manager and City Attorney.

R3. The new City Manager should, within 6 months of their appointment to the position of City Manager, recruit and appoint permanent department heads to fill current department head vacancies.

R4. By 1/1/2025 the City Council should direct the City Manager to undertake a study to determine the factors leading to the city’s high employee turnover and vacancy rates.

R5. By 1/1/2025 the Mayor and City Council should consider directing the City Manager and

City Attorney to organize an annual training session focused on Brown Act requirements and compliance for the Mayor, City Council members, relevant city employees and members of city boards and commissions.

Written Response Required by Sept. 13, Six Months to Implement Recommendations

The report asks for a written response from the city council by Sept. 13, 2024, required by state law, providing whether the council agrees, disagrees or partially disagrees with each of the findings and include explanations for each one with which they either disagree or partially disagree. It also requires the council members outline how they are going to implement the recommendations or if they cannot, why not. The council has six months to implement the recommendations.

See Grand Jury Foreperson’s Cover Letter to Report

See Grand Jury Report 2405 Challenges Facing The City of Antioch

Only Hernandez-Thorpe, Barbanica Respond to Questions for Councilmembers

Questions were sent Tuesday evening to all five council members asking for their comments about the three matters and the direction given by the Grand Jury. They were also asked, besides the search for a new city manager, what is being done to fill the staff vacancies and stem the tide of City employees leaving. The council members were also asked where they are in the process of hiring a permanent city manager, if they have interviewed any candidates, yet, how many, and if they have set a date for the process to be completed.

Hernandez-Thorpe, Wilson and Torres-Walker were specifically asked why they held meetings together outside of either closed session or regular city council meetings, how many private meetings were held at which the three were present, and if any city business was ever discussed.

They were also asked if the discussions involved the hiring of former City Manager Cornelius “Con” Johnson, restructuring the Public Works Department, hiring a city engineer and/or redistricting the city’s electoral map, as is included in the report, and if not, what was discussed during the meetings.

Finally, all five were asked what their response will be to the Grand Jury as requested.

Mayor Has Campaign Spokesman, Former City PIO Respond with Statement

Hernandez-Thorpe responded Tuesday night writing simply, “Rolando will respond on my behalf. Thanks! -LH.” The mayor was referring to Rolando Bonilla, his re-election campaign’s “Communications Director”, and the City’s previous public information officer whose contract was terminated last year. That occurred following the controversy over a press release with words attributed to then-Police Chief Steve Ford critical of the Antioch Police Officers Association, which Ford denied saying. Bonilla said he was later offered the job back by Acting City Manager Forrest Ebbs who was appointed after City Manager Con Johnson was placed on paid leave, and provided a copy of an email between Bonilla and Ebbs as proof. (See related articles here, here and here)

Bonilla wrote, “The Mayor isn’t going to waste his time responding to conspiracy theories, as he is focused on reforming a city government that was so unaccountable that it allowed its police department to publicly embrace a culture of hate and racism that would still be in place today were in [sic] not for the FBI intervening. 

As far as the Brown Act, If the civil grand jury believed that the Mayor did something wrong then they should have had the guts to have detailed the allegations with facts. Instead, they hid behind a letter that had zero evidence of wrong but hid behind the word ‘possible’. Weak.”

Hernandez-Thorpe was reminded the Grand Jury is requiring a response from the city council by Sept. 13 and it was pointed out to him that Bonilla’s response did not answer the questions sent to the mayor and councilmembers. The questions were sent again to Hernandez-Thorpe.

Bonilla responded with the same statement. After pressing the mayor again for answers to the questions about the other issues and recommendations from the Grand Jury, Hernandez-Thorpe’s campaign spokesman wrote, “You got your answers. Run it if you want, or don’t. That’s all you are getting.”

Barbanica Posts Video Calling for Resignation of Mayor, Councilwomen, Further Investigation

About an hour after the questions were emailed by the Herald, District 2 Councilman Mike Barbanica posted a video on his YouTube channel and his county Supervisor’s campaign Facebook page Tuesday evening in which he called for the resignation of his three council colleagues.

“Last year the DA’s Office got a report from somebody that said that these Brown Act violations were occurring,” the retired police sergeant stated. “A criminal investigation was conducted at that time.”

“They in turn forwarded that off to the Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury who launched an investigation,” he continued. “When they do those investigations, they’re done in secrecy.”

“Yes, they believe Brown Act violations possibly occurred, here, in secret meetings that were conducted at Mayor Thorpe’s house with all three of those members outside of the view of the public, with no other council members there and the public not having the ability to attend the meeting and it wasn’t properly noticed,” Barbanica shared. “That is a secret meeting where people collude, essentially is what the Brown Act is designed to guard against, issues of concern.” He then mentioned the matters believed to be discussed outlined in the DA’s letter.

“They can’t prove the content of the meeting,” he continued about the DA’s Office and Grand Jury’s findings. “Often what that’s from is people not talking about what occurred.”

“I’m urging…the two council members and mayor to step down,” the councilman stated. “Do the right thing.” This is not the way cities are supposed to operate. This is supposed to be open to the public, fair, transparent. This is not transparency.”

Barbanica also urged “DA Becton to reopen a criminal investigation and investigate this to the fullest extent of the law. I realize there are prior relationships there. If, in fact, you don’t feel comfortable doing that, please refer it over to the state Attorney General and have it investigated, there.”

“This has got to stop,” he exclaimed. “Many of us have felt that this has been occurring for some time. But now we have the DA’s Office saying, ‘hey, we think it might be, as well’ and we have the Civil Grand Jury saying, ‘we, too, think it might be, as well.’”

“I urge them to probe further into this and find out if criminal acts did in fact happen and if they did, prosecute them,” Barbanica stated. He then reiterated his call for “all the members, just do the right thing and step down.”

“We all know we can’t violate the Brown Act and I’m calling on the county Board of Supervisors to back me publicly, in this request, not only to the DA’s Office but to the members on the Antioch City Council, as well,” he concluded.

The mayor and councilwomen were then asked for their responses to Barbanica’s video.

Hernandez-Thorpe Says They Weren’t Meetings, Won’t Respond to Barbanica

But when reached for comment, later, the mayor said, “What I’m not going to do is get caught up in Barbanica’s nonsense.”

He then responded to the allegations of Brown Act violations saying, “We’ve had get-togethers at my house but not meetings. My house has always been the gathering place. The law is very clear and what you can’t do is have a discussion where you’ve had a predetermination where the public can’t participate. That didn’t happen.

“I appreciate the Grand Jury took a long view in terms of staffing issues. But the issue, for example in the Maintenance Department is compaction,” Hernandez-Thorpe stated. “There’s not enough pay differential between leadership and subordinates. But I can tell you we are dealing with it.”

Regarding low staffing levels in the police department, he said, “I’m sorry but they caused this problem internally,” referring to the  FBI and DA investigations including for the racist text scandal.

About the report, Hernandez-Thorpe said, “We’ve had it for a couple weeks. The Grand Jury calls you in for the findings and they did that with Barbanica and me.”

The council is already addressing the first of the recommendations. Asked about hiring a new, permanent city manager the mayor said, “We’re close to the end. I can tell you that. We’ll probably have this wrapped in a month or month-and-a-half. What I will be doing is visiting the candidate and other council members are welcome to do it as well to spend some time with the candidate to see if it feels right.

Regarding the other recommendations and the required response letter Hernandez-Thorpe said, “We’ve never done it before. We’ll figure it out. It can be helpful. We’ve changed the Animal Shelter based on the Grand Jury’s recommendations.”

“There are times we have clearly violated the Brown Act,” he continued. “The CDBG Committee was meeting without notices. So, when I became mayor, I fixed that. When we put (former City Manager) Con (Johnson) on paid leave, Barbanica, Monica and Lori violated the law. I went on camera and said we messed up.”

“If we did something wrong we’re more than happy to correct it,” the mayor added.

“We’re all Democrats and tend to lean progressive. We don’t have to have secret meetings. We just tend to agree,” he explained.

Hernandez-Thorpe then shared statistics of the council’s votes as an argument about not just he and the two council members agreeing most of the time. He said, “Of 525 votes in 2021, 17 were 3-2 votes.”

The information is based on research by the Municipal Fellow working in City Hall funded by the Urban League, the mayor shared. Hernandez-Thorpe said he told him to look at voting trends. “In terms of split votes, we’ve had 4-1 votes 16 times and 4-0-1 votes when someone abstained, were 48 times. He looked at all of the votes.”

Former City Manager Con Johnson Denies Attending Gatherings at Mayor’s Home, Blames City Attorney

When asked if he had been in attendance at any of the gatherings where the mayor and two council members allegedly discussed city business, former City Manager Cornelius “Con” Johnson said, “No. I was not involved in any of those shenanigans. I was not part of any hiring process. I was not involved in either of those things. I was not at Lamar’s house when it came to my hiring or to the redistricting.”

“I do know the council was aware of it on other issues,” he continued. “I did send notices about violations to (City Attorney) Thomas Smith.”

“I think the city council started on a slippery slope. They were disclosing information to the press that was unlawful,” Johnson stated. “I do know that I did bring possible Brown Act violations. I blame Thomas because he failed to keep the council safe. It’s the city attorney who is to make sure the city council doesn’t cross that line. I can only speak to what I brought to Thomas, the city attorney of the Brown Act violations.”

Barbanica Says Witness Approached Him Before Going to DA

When reached later for answers to the questions emailed to him specifically about the issues of city staff leadership turnover and vacancies, Barbanica stated, “We’re in a sad state of affairs right now because a lot of the employees who have come into the city have seen what’s going on from the Grand Jury and DA’s office, and when they see opportunities in other cities, they take them.”

“We either need a full commitment from the council to do things the right way or we need a new council,” he said.

He was then asked why he’s calling for their resignations, now knowing he has more than five months remaining in his term, as Barbanica is running for county supervisor not re-election, and will have to continue to work with the mayor and two councilwomen. The councilman said, “This is a much bigger picture and nobody should stand silent just to get a third vote when we have serious violations that are occurring at the expense of the city. If that means I don’t have a third vote for calling this out for what it is, then so be it.”

Asked about the response letter required by the Grand Jury, Barbanica doubled down on his call for reopening the investigation.

“I will be responding individually to the Grand Jury and my recommendation in my response is to stand with me to pressure the DA’s office or the Attorney General’s office to reopen the investigation,” he stated.

“This is betrayal to the community and to the people they work with on the council,” the District 3 councilman exclaimed. “This is totally contrary to the way the council is supposed to operate. To look at us on the council and members of the community in the eye, knowing all along that this is a predetermined vote, that is betrayal to the community.”

“I will tell you the person who shared this information that led to the investigation came to me with it,” Barbanica offered. “By the time it got to the Grand Jury they were talking to multiple people. I sat with that person and talked with them and learned of the information at one point.”

“But I have assured that person I will not be the one to reveal their identity to the public,” the councilman added.

Mayor’s Former Love Interest Told DA, Grand Jury 3 Councilmembers Discussed Redistricting in Private

Both Antioch City Clerk Ellie Householder and Lacey Ferguson, Hernandez-Thorpe’s former friends had a falling out with him following, had a falling out with him following settlement by the Board of Supervisors of the sexual harassment claims against him in 2022. The women were each provided with the DA’s Office letter, cover letter from the Grand Jury foreperson and the report and asked if they were in attendance at any of the same gatherings at the mayor’s home, as he and the two council members. They were also asked, if so, do they remember what was discussed by the three council members, if they spoke with anyone in the Contra Costa DA’s Office or the Grand Jury, and for any other information they’d like to provide.

Ferguson responded, “I was a cooperating witness in the investigation, and you can reach out to the DA for any info you need regarding that. I live in another state.”

“I believe my recorded interview is the only evidence used in front of the Grand Jury to confirm discussions regarding redistricting, as I didn’t feel it was right to do to Lori.” She was referring to the gerrymandering by the three council members that created a new Council District 3 and 4, moving Ogorchock into Wilson’s neighboring district. It prevents Ogorchock from running for re-election this year. (See related article)

First Amendment Coalition CEO Says Private Discussions Violate the Law

After reading the letter from the DA’s Office, the cover letter from the Grand Jury foreperson and the report, David Snyder, CEO of the First Amendment Coalition, a government watchdog organization responded, “I’d say that while neither the DA’s letter nor the grand jury report definitely conclude that members of the city council violated the Brown Act, it appears there was substantial evidence that was that case. That’s very troubling. Public officials meeting in private to discuss such consequential matters as the redistricting of the city’s electoral map is a breach of the public trust, not to mention a violation of state law.”

Attempts to reach Householder and additional efforts to reach Wilson, Torres-Walker and Ogorchock were unsuccessful prior to publication time. Please check back later for any updates to this report.

For more information read the complete Brown Act state open meeting law.

Review deadline: July 10

By Office of Contra Costa County Supervisor Federal Glover

We need your feedback!

The Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County (WDBCCC) and the Contra Costa County Employment & Human Services Department (EHSD) invite you to review and provide feedback on the draft document titled “Implementation Plan for Measure X-Funded Youth Centers.”

According to the county’s website, “Measure X is a countywide 20-year, ½ cent sales tax approved by Contra Costa County voters on November 3, 2020. The ballot measure language stated that the intent of Measure X is ‘to keep Contra Costa’s regional hospital open and staffed; fund community health centers, emergency response; support crucial safety-net services; invest in early childhood services; protect vulnerable populations; and for other essential county services.’”

This document outlines the plans for three new youth centers in Supervisorial Districts 3, 4, and 5. Your input is crucial and will help county policymakers and administrators shape the design and implementation of these centers.

Public Review Period: July 1 – July 10, 2024, until 5:00 PM.

To access the document and submit your feedback, please click here: https://www.wdbccc.com/measure-x-youth-centers/

Your participation in this process is invaluable. Thank you for helping us make a difference in our community!

For total of $278.83 billion, Antioch has 5th greatest amount of 19 cities with about 6% of total

“…the highest to date in Contra Costa County’s history” – Gus Kramer, County Assessor

Antioch had 3rd highest increase in assessed value at almost 5% mainly due to new homes

By Office of the Contra Costa County Assessor

The “2024-2025” Assessor’s “Close of Roll Affidavit” was signed by Gus S. Kramer, Assessor, and subscribed and sworn to the County Clerk-Recorder’s Office, on June 28, 2024. The 2024-2025 Assessment Roll has been delivered to the County Auditor, as required by law.

The increase to the local tax base for 2024-2025 is over $11.16 billion. This represents a 4.17% increase in assessed value and brings the total net local assessment roll to more than $278.83 billion. The 2024-2025 assessment roll is the highest to date in Contra Costa County’s history. Of that amount $233.28 billion was from within the 19 cities and the balance within the unincorporated areas of the county.

Cities with the largest increases in assessed value include Antioch, Oakley and Martinez with increases ranging from 4.99% and 5.21% to 6.09%, respectively. San Ramon, Concord and Walnut Creek saw the lowest assessed value increases ranging from 2.97% down to 1.45%. The assessment roll now consists of 380,681 parcels, an increase of 1,239 over the previous year.

Of the 19 cities in the county San Ramon has the greatest Gross Assessed Value, which includes both secured and non-secured at $28.63 billion, followed by Walnut Creek at $27.13 billion, Concord with $23.64 billion, Richmond with $21.42 billion, Danville with $18.13 billion and Antioch with $16.72 billion in assessed value.

“I would like to acknowledge and commend the employees of the Assessor’s Office for their continued dedication and hard work which resulted in the completion and delivery of the 2024-2025 assessment roll,” Kramer wrote in his annual letter to the Board of Supervisors.

UPDATE: The County Assessor explained, the increase in the assessed value in Antioch is a combination of new home developments and the resale of older homes at higher prices. “This doesn’t mean taxes are going up,” Kramer stated.

His letter and the 2024-2025 Assessment Roll Reports can be found, here.

Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations can offer meals for dine-in, delivery and takeout and with limits, in addition to Cottage Food Operations already allowed

By Contra Costa Health

Contra Costa residents interested in selling home-cooked food to the public can now get a health permit to do so, an affordable option for entrepreneurs that ensures the safety of their customers.

Beginning July 1, Contra Costa Health (CCH) offers a new type of food permit for small-scale, home-based restaurants operated inside private homes by their residents. Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations (MEHKOs) can offer meals for dine-in, delivery and takeout. MEHKOs can offer meals for dine-in, take-out, and/or delivery, and can also be used as a commissary for permitted food carts.

“By providing this option we ensure that people who sell food out of their homes do so in a safe manner that protects the health of our community,” said Federal Glover, chair of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. “We also open the door for neighborhood businesses, and for more access to healthy, nutritious food in areas where options may be limited.”

The board unanimously adopted an ordinance in May authorizing the county to offer the permit under terms of a 2018 state law. Several other Bay Area jurisdictions already do so, including Alameda, San Mateo, Santa Clara and Solano counties, and the City of Berkeley.

The permit allows meals to be stored, handled, and prepared to be served or delivered in a private residence. Most other food permits require a commercial kitchen in a restaurant or similar facility.

A permitted home can also serve as a space to prepare food for sale on street carts, a requirement to obtain a cart vendor health permit that has proven to be a significant barrier in Contra Costa.

As with holders of standard commercial food permits, MEHKO permit holders must meet requirements relating both to the spaces where their businesses operate and the food-safety training of operators. CCH will inspect each permit holder annually or more often.

The MEHKO permits do limit the holder to selling no more than 30 meals per day and 90 meals per week, and no more than $100,000 in gross annual sales. There are also some limitations regarding the type of food that may be served.

CCH will schedule workshops throughout the county later this year for potential applicants.

“This permit is great for new entrepreneurs who are just getting started,” CCH Environmental Health Director Kristian Lucas said. “It’s also a way for the public to know that a seller advertising on social media is complying with food safety regulations.”

MEHKO permit holders will be required to display their permits at their homes, and their health inspection records will be available to the public at cchealth.org.

Cottage Food Operations Already Allowed

Contra Costa Health offers two kinds of permits for home-based food operations. In addition, to the new MEHKO, the county also allows Cottage Food Operations (CFO) which “is a home-based operation that allows limited amounts of certain foods to be prepared in a home kitchen for retail sale. A CFO can prepare and package non-potentially hazardous foods from home. The California Department of Public Health maintains a listing of foods approved to be sold from a private residence. Some examples of these foods include cookies, candies, jams/jellies, muffins, cakes, and pies. Only foods on the state listing are approved as cottage food products.

According to the California Department of Public Health Food and Drug Branch, “There are two different classes of CFO’s:

Class A: This type of CFO can sell home-kitchen prepared foods directly to the public. This includes transactions made via the phone, internet, and any other digital method. A direct sale may be fulfilled in person, via mail delivery, or using any other third-party delivery service. A Class A operator’s current maximum gross annual sales are $75,000.

Class B: This type of CFO can sell home-kitchen prepared foods directly to the public or indirectly through restaurants and food markets. A direct sale may be fulfilled in person, via mail delivery, or using any other third-party delivery service. An indirect sale may be fulfilled in person, via mail delivery, or third-party delivery service. The current gross annual sales for a Class B operator are $150,000.

In Antioch, home-based business owners are also required to obtain a Home Occupation Use Permit from the City.

For more information about the new and CFO permits, including how to apply, visit cchealth.org/homekitchens.

SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom announced on Tuesday, June 18, 2024, his appointment of 15 Superior Court Judges, which include one in Contra Costa County; two in Los Angeles County; one in Marin County; one in Napa County; one in Riverside County; one in Sacramento County; three in San Diego County; one in San Francisco County; two in San Joaquin County; one in San Mateo County; and one in Santa Clara County.

Michael Nieto, of Contra Costa County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Contra Costa County Superior Court. Nieto has served as an Assistant District Attorney at the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office since 2022 and has been a Deputy District Attorney there since 1997.

According to his LinkedIn profile, Nieto worked in private practice as an associate attorney for McCutcheon Doyle Brown & Enersen from June 1994 to Dec. 1996 and earned a Bachelors of Arts in Government from Harvard University.

He has served as an Adjunct Professor at the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco since 2013. Nieto earned a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California College of the Law (formerly Hastings), San Francisco. He fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Clare Maier. Nieto is a Democrat.

The annual compensation for each of the judicial positions is $238,479.

Allen D. Payton contributed to this report.

At Contra Costa Regional Medical Center in Martinez

By Contra Costa Health

Children and adolescents having psychiatric emergencies will have their own standalone 24/7 behavioral health crisis stabilization space in Contra Costa County starting Monday, June 24.

The new Contra Costa Youth Stabilization Unit will serve people ages 6-17 for the first 24 hours of a diagnosed psychiatric emergency when they are considered a danger to themselves or others.

Until now, youth in the county experiencing psychiatric emergencies were treated alongside adults in the Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) unit at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center. Children and teens will now be able to receive developmentally appropriate emergency psychiatric care in a dedicated space designed for pediatric patients that is separate from the adult PES.

“This is a huge step forward for mental healthcare for youth in our community,” said Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Chair Federal Glover. “Having a dedicated standalone space for children and adolescents will provide our kids with a more safe, secure and therapeutic environment to help them heal.”

The Youth Stabilization Unit, located at 25 Allen Street next to the Miller Wellness Center, will be able to serve up to eight minors at a time. In 2023, there were 1,072 admissions for pediatric psychiatric patients at the PES unit. The majority of those admitted were adolescents and young teens who presented with depression and suicidal ideation or intent.

Contra Costa Health has contracted with Pacific Clinics to staff the new unit. Care teams will include psychiatrists, registered nurses, licensed vocational nurses, licensed psychiatric technicians, clinicians and crisis intervention specialists. Services will include crisis intervention, mental health assessment, medication assistance, therapy, alcohol and drug screening, case management and peer support.

The program is designed to provide a calming and welcoming environment to support mental wellness. The goal is to stabilize the unit’s patients and connect them with mental health services without requiring inpatient hospitalization, although, when clinically appropriate, inpatient care may still be recommended.

Many children and adolescents suffering mental health crises are either hospitalized or arrested, which can be even further destabilizing. Having a team of mental health professionals available to provide crisis stabilization at the new facility will help divert youth from unnecessary encounters with law enforcement or visits to hospital emergency rooms.

“The new Crisis Stabilization Unit will give youth experiencing a behavioral health crisis compassionate care tailored to their needs,” said Suzanne Tavano, Behavioral Health director for Contra Costa Health. “It is going to be a tremendous resource for our community.”

“Our team’s primary goals are to provide support and safety to these young individuals in a time of crisis,” said Mary Sheppard, regional executive director for Pacific Clinics. “We will be a therapeutic, landing spot for them and aim to instill in them the belief that there is hope beyond this moment.”