Beginning Monday, April 29 – will include new dog park, restroom and more.

By City of Antioch

Exciting News for Antioch residents in the Sycamore area.

Get ready for a whole new level of fun and relaxation at Contra Loma Estates Park! The City of Antioch is gearing up for some major renovations, and we couldn’t be more thrilled to share the details with you.

Starting Monday, April 29th, we’ll be rolling up our sleeves and diving into construction to give your beloved park a fresh new look! Here’s what’s in store:

A Pawsome Addition: Get tails wagging with the construction of a brand-new DOG PARK! Let your furry friends frolic and play in a safe and designated space just for them.

Convenience at Your Fingertips: We’re installing a much-needed RESTROOM facility for your comfort and convenience.

Light Up Your Path: Enjoy evening strolls with a newly LIGHTED WALKING PATH, perfect for soaking in the beauty of the park after sunset.

Fitness Fanatics Rejoice: Say hello to fantastic EXERCISE EQUIPMENT, helping you stay active and healthy while enjoying the great outdoors.

Game On: Shoot some hoops under the stars with upgraded LIGHTING for the basketball court!

And that’s just the beginning! With a host of other amenities in the pipeline, the future of Contra Loma Estates Park is brighter than ever before.

Please note: The park will be closed to the public during construction for everyone’s safety. Have questions or eager to learn more? Reach out to our Capital Improvements Department at (925) 779-7050 – we’re here to help!

Get ready to experience a whole new level of fun, relaxation, and community at Contra Loma Estates Park. Together, let’s make memories that last a lifetime!

Following employee complaints of a supervisor for prank that occurred over a year ago

Second special meeting in a week scheduled unilaterally by Hernandez – who has publicly called for Anello’s resignation – without confirming if other board members can attend; at least two trustees can’t

By Allen D. Payton

Following Antioch Unified School District employee complaints of their former boss of placing an employees’ desk on the roof in January 2023 and bullying them, and several news reports by NBC Bay Area, Superintendent Stephanie Anello has come under fire from Board President and Area 1 Trustee Antonio Hernandez. Both he and Area 2 Trustee Jag Lathan have been quoted in one or more of the news reports commenting on the employee matter. Now, Hernandez is calling for Anello’s resignation because of the incident. (See related articles here, here and here)

While the Director of Facilities, Maintenance and Operations, Kenny Turnage, II, pulled the prank and, in response, Anello has moved him into the district office to oversee the funds from the recently passed Measure B bond measure.

Before taking his position with the school district, Turnage owned and operated K2GC in Antioch which was voted repeatedly as the city’s best General Contractor over multiple years. While Chair of the Antioch Planning Commission in 2020, he was removed by a vote of the Antioch City Council following comments about COVID on his personal Facebook page. That effort was led by District 4 Councilwoman Monica Wilson who Turnage was expected to run against later that year. He was honored as the 2015 Antioch Citizen of the Year for Most Impact. Instead of running for city council Turnage run unsuccessfully in 2020 for AUSD Area 3 Trustee.

Turnage is good friends with Anello’s husband, former Antioch Police Chief Allan Cantando, which has caused some to complain and speculate the AUSD employee is being given special treatment by the superintendent.

Now, according to another NBC Bay Area news report, based on leaked information not provided to board members in an email but not to other media by the superintendent nor district staff, Anello has called for a separate investigation of the matter without her involved.

Yet, Hernandez has called two special board meetings, with a second one scheduled for Thursday, April 25, 2024 at 7:00 p.m., to Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release [Pursuant to Government Code section 54957] and Public Employee Performance Evaluation Title: Superintendent [Pursuant to Government Code section 54957 and at least two other board members can’t attend. He called the first special meeting for last Friday, but it could not be held for lack of a quorum.

According to Area 3 Trustee Dr. Clyde Lewis who said he can’t attend this week’s special meeting, explained that the school board meeting agendas are set by the president, vice president and superintendent. But Vice President and Area 5 Trustee Mary Rocha was not involved.

When asked to verify that, Rocha said, “I have not been included in any of Antonio’s dealings. He said Thursday he was holding a special meeting on Friday and instructed a staff member to call the other board members. But I was going out of town for my birthday weekend. No meeting was held due to a lack of quorum. So he called another one for this Thursday and I didn’t know about it until school board staff called me and I didn’t know what was on the agenda. I’d only heard it was similar to the one before.”

“I have a funeral to attend tomorrow and family visiting from Texas, and I don’t see the urgency,” she explained. “Stephanie gave notice early Wednesday morning that she’s out on sick leave until Tuesday.”

“But when you’re the board president, out of courtesy, why would you call a special meeting if you didn’t know if your members can attend?” Rocha asked. “He’s talking to the TV and throwing us under the bus trying to claim we don’t care and he’s the only one who does.”

“Now, it’s getting hot with the employees complaining about Kenny Turnage,” she continued. “It’s a personnel matter. Stephanie has to tell us what they’re doing with it. We’ve had people come to the board meetings and complain and it’s been referred to her to handle it. But I have an email from her that she’s calling for a separate investigation without her involved,” confirming that Anello sent her email to board members.

“A separate personnel commission was set up in the 1970’s to protect from nepotism,” Rocha explained. “If we create a new position, their job is to set up job description and wages. There has always been a maintenance director, but the previous person retired and Turnage applied for it. We don’t know who else applied for it. After the person goes through the interviews and then they’re brought to us for approval. We found out who it was, afterwards.”

“You call a special meeting to deal with an employee evaluation and discipline and possible removal when they’ve done something like embezzlement,” the Area 5 Trustee stated. “Every board president is responsible for the annual evaluation. But none of them have scheduled one for the superintendent since, I think the last one by Diane Gibson-Gray. Clyde tried to have one last year. But every year we can’t seem to agree on the right trainer to help us in the evaluation process and set our goals.”

“This is all coming in from the mayor,” Rocha stated. “He and Antonio are best buddies. Then you have Jag. Just go look at all the photos with the mayor. They’re the only two invited. Antonio is always announcing events the mayor invites him to, ribbon cuttings and grand openings. But we’re never invited.”

Asked if this is another attempt by the board minority to terminate Anello, Rocha said, “heck, yes. They tried it with Ellie when she was president.”

That effort was also supported by Hernandez, but Lewis, Rocha and Area 4 Trustee Gary Hack wouldn’t support it.

“They tried it when Debra Vinson was one of two members on the board giving her problems,” Rocha added.

“You can’t evaluate her when you don’t have any goals,” she continued. “That situation with Turnage was a year ago. all of a sudden, they’re bringing it up. But the superintendent did something to handle it. She moved him out of the position and put him in the district office to deal with the bond issue. But we haven’t had much communication with her about it.”

“You have to give employees the opportunity to clean things up. You can’t just fire them. They have rights,” Rocha explained.

“Antonio isn’t giving us the courtesy, he’s just talking to the reporters,” she complained. “The president is just out there condemning the employee. What right does he have to do that?”

“When that reporter showed up at the council meeting with the cameras rolling, the president should have cut the mic,” Rocha stated. “He should have told the reporter, we can’t discuss that, it’s a personnel matter. But he allowed the press to speak against both of them, Stephanie and Turnage. The president kept allowing it to happen.” (See April 10, 2024 Antioch School Board meeting video at the 1:10:17 mark)

Questions were sent to Hernandez late Wednesday night asking why he is scheduling special board meetings before first having district staff poll the members to ensure there will be a quorum as didn’t happen for last Friday’s special meeting that he called. The board president was also asked, “Why are you setting the agenda unilaterally without discussion and confirmation with the board vice president as is the practice? Upon what do you plan to base the board’s evaluation of the superintendent? Have you and the board set any goals for the superintendent to achieve?”

Hernandez was also asked, “Is this another attempt to terminate Ms. Anello like you and then-Board President Ellie Householder unsuccessfully attempted following your election in 2020? Are you the one who leaked the information about the superintendent’s call for a separate investigation? Are you aware Ms. Anello has called in sick through next Tuesday as of Wednesday morning so she won’t be able to attend the closed session for the board to evaluate her? Do you think it’s appropriate to call for the superintendent’s resignation before evaluating her performance? Do you think it’s appropriate for a school board member to publicly speak about a personnel matter and about specific employees? How can you fairly evaluate a superintendent after you’ve publicly called for their resignation?”

Attempts to reach both Turnage and Anello about the employee complaints and the response by the superintendent have been unsuccessful to date.

AUSD board meetings are held in the Board Room at the District Office, located at 510 G Street in historic, downtown Rivertown. Thursday’s special meeting, if held, can be viewed live on the District’s YouTube channel.

Please check back later for his responses and any other updates to this report.

Victims asked residents if they could enter their homes but were refused

“There was blood all over the place.”

APD UPDATE: No evidence of a drive-by, shooters were on foot; at least two others had non-life-threatening gunshot wounds

By Allen D. Payton

A resident who lives on Prewett Ranch Drive shared what he witnessed and learned from neighbors during and following what was initially reported by Antioch Police as a drive-by shooting that wounded a woman in Antioch late Tuesday night. It ended in a gun battle between people in several cars and a car crashed on another neighbor’s lawn.

“The people who live at the house where the drive-by occurred left the house, engaged in a gun battle at Oneida and Prewett Ranch,” stated the neighbor who chose to remain anonymous. “I saw it on a neighbor’s surveillance video.”

“It shows two vehicles, a silver and a black, both sedans, leaving the house where the drive-by happened, after the drive-by,” he continued. “They got to the corner and the silver vehicle, as it proceeds around the corner it was engaged in a gun battle with a third vehicle – that you couldn’t make out what it was – that was going the opposite direction, westbound on Prewett toward the (Diablo Vista) elementary school on the corner.”

“I live on Prewett. At some point after I heard the gunfire, we heard a crash. I think it was the (unidentified) vehicle involved in the gun battle. Because the black sedan cut off the third vehicle involved in the gun battle. It crashed onto the lawn of another home on Prewett (in the 5100 block). Those people bailed out of the car claiming they’d been shot, males and females. I know this because I spoke with the residents of that home and neighbors.

“The residents could see the people were injured badly because there was blood all over the place. They asked if they could come in, but the residents closed the door.

“The vehicle’s occupants went to the house next door, banged on his door, he sees they’ve been shot, but he’s not letting anybody in.

“Police recovered a gun from underneath that guy’s truck in front of his house.

“There were 15 people at the house where the drive-by occurred. There were four cars. There were people running across the next-door neighbor’s lawn, checking out the house, making sure people were home, is my guess, then they went back and got into the cars then drove by and shot up the house.

“The silver and black sedans were parked in front of the house when the drive-by occurred. Then the residents ran out, got it in the cars and drove off. I can’t tell you how many people got it. The video I saw shows a few people going back and forth between the cars.

“That same, third car was coming back, and the black sedan forced it off the road and into the yard. The black sedan ran into garbage cans and ended up on the sidewalk across the street. Everybody in that vehicle, there were six to seven, I saw them, they bailed from that vehicle and ran. But they only hid across the street between parked cars and homes.

“The neighbors had floodlights and they were running back and forth to the car, trying to start it. Then they drove off and parked on the corner of Candlewood and Prewett, near Chaparral Park, waiting for the others to catch up and get in the car. Then they drove off.”

“The people who got shot up in that car, they got picked up by people in two other cars.

“There was a total of, easily six cars involved. There were four cars involved in the drive-by the neighbor told me.”

“Neighbors have been complaining about that house where the drive-by occurred for about two years. Antioch Police have been to that house before. Code Enforcement has been to that house. The owner lives in Antioch but won’t return the neighbors’ calls.”

“The house is Section 8, definitely,” he added.

Asked about what the neighbor shared regarding the house where the drive-by shooting occurred, Interim Police Chief Brian Addington said, “Yes, Antioch PD has had some calls about this house in the past.”

Asked about the gun battle and crash he stated, “We’re not going to share any additional information as it’s an open investigation. But we have some promising leads we’re following up on.”

APD UPDATE: Not a Drive-By, Shooters Were on Foot; At Least Two Others Had Non-Life-Threatening Gunshot Wounds

Later, in response to what the neighbor shared and a request for any additional details of the gun battle, Antioch Police Detective John Cox of the Investigations Bureau Violent Crime Unit-Robbery/Homicide offered additional information.

He wrote, “We are still sorting through surveillance video, speaking with witnesses, and identifying who was at the scene during the shooting. I cannot confirm how many people or vehicles were involved. The evidence so far indicates the people involved in the shooting were on foot, not shooting from their vehicles.

I can confirm at least one vehicle was involved in a collision after the shooting occurred. We have located two other victims, one male and one female, who sought treatment for non-life-threatening gunshot wounds at an outside area hospital.

We are still asking for any witnesses or any residents with surveillance video who have not been contacted by police already, to contact me” at (925) 779-6866 or email: jcox@antiochca.gov.

However, what he shared contradicted the press release from APD about the incident which read, “Someone from inside the vehicle fired numerous shots at the residence, the female was struck, and the vehicle fled.”

Addington and Cox were then asked about the discrepancy and if the first shooting occurred from a vehicle and the subsequent shootings occurred while the suspects were on foot or were all the shootings done by suspects on foot.

Cox responded Monday morning with, “So far, we know of one shooting scene in the 5400 block of Oneida Wy. Evidence indicates the shooters were on foot. I do not have any evidence that shows anyone shot from a vehicle. There is no evidence of a second shooting scene. The accident scene was in the 5100 block of Prewett Ranch Dr and the accident occurred after the shooting.

That’s all I can release at this time.”

Police seek suspect(s)

By Allen D. Payton

Following reports of gunshots heard in a neighborhood off Prewett Ranch Road east of Deer Valley Road and south of Lone Tree Way, late Tuesday night, and information shared from Next Door by residents, Interim Antioch Police Chief Brian Addington, was asked for details Wednesday morning.

He responded Wednesday afternoon with the following information:

Last night, Tuesday, April 16, 2024, at approximately 11 PM, Antioch officers responded to a residence on the 5000 block of Oneida Way for the report of a man with a gun.  As information was being taken by dispatch, officers began responding.  During this time additional reports were received that shots had been fired. 

When officers arrived, a female victim was found inside a residence suffering from a non-life threating gunshot wound.  The female was transported to an area hospital for treatment where she was determined to be in stable condition.

During the investigation it was learned that several people were inside and outside of the residence when a vehicle drove by. Someone from inside the vehicle fired numerous shots at the residence, the female was struck, and the vehicle fled.  It was also learned that this incident may have stemmed from an earlier argument between several people.

Numerous items determined to be evidence were collected at the scene.  This case is being investigated by our Violent Crimes Investigations Unit. Anyone with information is asked to Contact Detective Cox at (925) 779-6866 or email: jcox@antiochca.gov.

By Allen D. Payton

A two-vehicle crash in Antioch, Sunday afternoon, April 14, 2024, claimed the life of a man in his 30’s. According to his aunt he was from Pittsburg. The collision occurred in the intersection of Auto Center Drive and W. 10th Street, about 4:00 p.m.

Con Fire and Antioch Police personnel responded to the scene. According to Con Fire spokesman, Fire Prevention Captain Joe Ottolini, two other people were transported to local hospitals and at least one is in critical condition. He said there was one possible DOA. Interim Antioch Police Chief Brian Addington confirmed the fatality.

According to reports, the man was the driver of one of the cars and ran a red light causing the crash.

UPDATE: According to information provided by the Antioch Police Department, “This afternoon at 4:07 PM, the Antioch Police Dispatch Center began receiving multiple emergency calls reporting a major collision at the intersection of West 10th Street and Auto Center Drive.

Upon arrival, officers learned the driver of a blue Acura sedan was traveling northbound on Auto Center Drive, at a high rate of speed, approaching the intersection of West 10th Street. The Acura entered the intersection as a silver Lexus SUV was traveling westbound through the intersection (on West 10th Street), resulting in a “T-Bone” collision.

Police officers immediately administered first-aid at the scene to all the involved parties. Several fire engines from the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District also responded and paramedics took over first-aid and life-saving efforts.

Unfortunately, the solo occupant and driver of the Acura sedan (a 30-year-old male) succumbed to his injuries at the scene. The driver and passenger in the SUV were removed from their vehicle and transported to a local area hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.

Antioch Police Department Accident Investigators responded to the scene and took over the investigation, which is still ongoing. This investigation is in its preliminary stages and evidence and witness statements are being collected at this time. The names of the involved parties are not being released pending proper notifications.

Anyone with information is asked to call the Antioch Police Department Traffic Unit at (925) 779-6864.”

Process continues, expected to conclude next week

“…some officers have returned to work or will be returning, although some have been terminated.” – APOA attorney Mike Rains

UPDATE: As of Friday, April 12, 2024, APD has 77 current sworn officers of which 50 are on full duty status.

By Allen D.  Payton

Following up on a February Herald article about the Antioch Police Officers still on paid leave for the investigation into the racist text scandal since last March, questions were emailed on Thursday evening, Feb. 8, 2024, to City Attorney Thomas L. Smith, Acting City Manager Kwame Reed and Human Resources Director Ana Chavez asking:

“How long can police officers or any city employee remain on paid administrative leave?

Since most of the officers merely received but didn’t send any of the text messages, what possible disciplinary actions can be taken against them? 

When will the officers who merely received but didn’t send any text messages return to work? Have any of them, yet? If so, how many?

Can the investigation just go on indefinitely and the taxpayers continue to pay the officers on leave to not do their jobs?

Can’t the officers return to work as each one is deemed to have not committed any fireable offense?

Or do all of them have to wait to return to work until after the entire investigation has been completed?

Have any disciplinary actions been taken against any of the officers, yet? If so, how many? What did they include?

Have any of you been approached or pressured by any of the council members to keep the investigation open and not allow the officers to return to work – other than the public statements by the mayor and Councilwoman Torres-Walker that they want all of them fired?”  (See related articles here and here)

No responses to those questions were received from the three city staff members.

At that time, out of 81 sworn officers on the Antioch police force, 31 were on some form of leave, most for the text investigation, leaving only 50 sworn officers actively working. As previously reported, most of the officers caught up in the scandal only received some of the text messages but didn’t send any. (See related articles here and here)

On Wednesday, April 10, 2024, in response to a resident claiming none of the officers were still on leave due to the text scandal, questions were sent to Reed, Interim Police Chief Brian Addington and Mike Rains, attorney for the Antioch Police Officers Association.

They were asked if that statement was correct, if all the officers had returned to work and if any of them had been terminated.

Reed responded simply, “The process is still ongoing.”

Addington wrote, “That is incorrect, but I can’t comment further.”

However, Rains shared more details. He wrote, “We have not resolved all the cases. Some are resolved, and some officers have returned to work or will be returning, although some have been terminated.”

“I won’t discuss the outcome of administrative cases until all are concluded, probably in a week – 10 days,” he added.

According to a post by Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe on his official Facebook page on Tuesday, April 9, 2024, entitled, “April Police Staffing Update”, of the 115 sworn officer positions approved in the city budget, there are currently 89 sworn officers on the force, including nine Community Service Officers. Of that amount 39 are patrol officers. His report also shares that there are six officer candidates currently in the Police Academy and seven more are preparing to enter the academy this month.

But it doesn’t mention how many sworn officers are currently active. A question was emailed early Thursday afternoon to both Reed and Addington asking how many of the 80 non-CSO sworn officers are currently active.

UPDATE #1: They did not respond before end-of-business hours on Thursday. However, when asked if he had any comment, APOA Vice President Sgt. Loren Bledsoe responded, “The APOA cannot comment on personnel matters; however, we look forward to the conclusion of the investigation so we can focus on rebuilding.”

UPDATE #2: On Friday, Interim Chief Addington provided the following department staffing details, writing, “As you may be aware, staffing levels can change daily. With that said, as of today, APD staffing levels are as follows: 

115 – Authorized sworn staff

77 – Current sworn staff

5 – Modified duty (working but not able to work at full capacity)

22 – On some form of leave

50 – Full Duty Status

39 – Assigned to Patrol – 33 officers, 4 sergeants, 2 watch commanders

7 – Assigned to Investigations – 1 lieutenant 

4 – Command Staff

7 – Community Services Officers (4 vacancies).”

By Allen D. Payton

During their meeting, sans Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe, the Antioch City Council heard about two proposed new-home developments, one in the Sand Creek Focus Area and one on the far north side of the city. The mayor was in Washington, D.C. for the annual American Public Transit Association Legislative Conference, representing Tri Delta Transit for which he currently serves as chair.

Not all of the council members were supportive of the Richland Communities – Leung Property project adjacent to The Ranch development but all four offered enthusiastic support for the DeNova Homes’ Rancho Meadows project.

435-Home Leung Property Project in Sand Creek

Kyle Masters with Richland Communities spoke about the proposed 160-acre project on what’s known as the Leung property in the Sand Creek area across Deer Valley Road and south from the Kaiser Antioch Medical Center. (See Agenda Item 6)

The developer is proposing 435 units which includes 50 conventional single family detached units, 385 clustered single family detached residential units, and 159 row townhomes, according to the staff report and developer’s presentation.

“We’re looking at it more as an extension of our project, The Ranch project,” which is located just to the north. The first phase of that 1,100-home development was approved by the council last June. The proposed project is labeled, The Ranch – Phase 4.

“This provides more of a range of housing,” Masters continued. “A price point we may not have seen out there in Sand Creek. We see this as a second phase to The Ranch project.”

He said the project will, “provide a more affordable community. Lowering the entry point to homebuyers.”

During council discussion, District 2 Councilman Mike Barbanica shared of his displeasure that neither developer had reached out to him prior to the council meeting.

“I really wish someone would have picked up the phone. But that didn’t occur. I learned of them by pulling up the agenda on Friday afternoon,” he stated. “So, developers, please communicate with us. Give me a call, so we have time to go over them and see how the developments will affect the community.”

Both District 3 Councilwoman Lori Ogorchock and and Mayor Pro Tem Monica Wilson, who chaired the meeting, spoke of the desire for inclusionary housing. District 1 Councilwoman Tamisha Torres-Walker wanted to update the City’s General Plan which was last updated in 2003 before approving more housing in the Sand Creek area.

“The council adopted a housing element in 2023,” Acting Community Development Director and City Planner Steve Scudero responded. “We are almost to the point to bring a contract to hire a consultant to develop that (inclusionary housing) ordinance.”

“I live in a development that’s cluster housing. If you can figure out a way to make garbage service work, because it’s not working in my neighborhood,” Wilson shared.

“When I talk about inclusionary housing it doesn’t have to be there. It could be a credit for somewhere else,” Ogorchock added.

Asked by Wilson about not seeing any single-story homes in the plan, Masters responded. We’re just not at that level of detail, yet. We’re probably two to three years before coming back to you with this.”

“Most people are hoping we won’t be here, by then,” Torres-Walker responded. “But we’ll see what happens.”

143-Home Project with 6 Affordable Rental Units in Northeast Antioch

The other project proposed by DeNova Homes, is for a 143-home development off Vineyard Drive north of E. 18th Street. It includes six affordable rental units working with Yellow Roof Foundation. (See Agenda Item 7)

According to the city staff report, the residential development consists of 137 single family detached homes on approximately 2,600 square foot lots and six renter-occupied homes on 4,200 square foot lots designed for people who are at risk of being unhoused. The non-profit foundation is proposed to own and manage the six rentals.

Trent Sanson of DeNova Homes spoke during the presentation and responded to the councilmember’s questions.

Resident Andrew Becker, who usually opposes market-rate housing developments, spoke in support of the project.

During the council discussion Ogorchock spoke first saying, “I truly like the project. I think the lots are way small on this one. I think the park’s small. I’d like to see a bigger park. I’d also like to see a community garden.”

Agreeing with Torres-Walker, she said, “We have to have bathrooms in our parks.”

“I’m happy with Yellow Roof coming to town,” Ogorchock continued.

“I’d like to see walkability and trails,” she added.

Torres-Walker also liked Yellow Roof’s participation and hoped the homes would provide for transition into home ownership.

She advocated for larger sized back yards.

“I’m not a big supporter of gated communities,” Torres-Walker continued. “You can’t have a public park in a gated community. If it is, then you might want to rethink it being a gated community.”

“Is it affordable. I could be like everyone else saying you need a better paying job. People saying, ‘we need housing for all income levels. There has not been enough housing for low-income working families.

“15-minute cities. We use to live in those communities until we were pushed out with increasing rents,” Torres-Walker stated. “I just hope it actually has a pathway to home ownership.”

“I like the location…the fact that we’re doing this, that you put Yellow Roof in there,” Barbanica stated. “When a developer steps and does that and puts six units in there with ADU’s the money has to come from somewhere, either market-rate homes or smaller lots.

“You’re taking six units and saying, ‘come in here and pay whatever you can afford,’” he continued. “I do appreciate the fact that you are doing this in Antioch.”

“A little bit larger lots, if you can,” Barbanica added.

“They did call me, because it’s in my district…for the record,” Torres-Walker interjected.

“The individuals that go into these houses with lower rents, part of the money is set aside for them to get into home ownership,” Wilson inquired.

Confirming what she said, Sanson shared, “We try to keep it to a three-year program so people can get their financial affairs in order. We want to help more and more people that we can. Then they graduate on to home ownership.”

“I love that program but if you could add a couple more affordable units,” Wilson added. “I can support this project.”

Sanson then stated his company will work with city staff and include what was shared by the council members to finalize the project plan. Once ready, it will then be heard by the Planning Commission before returning to the council for a final vote.

Some campers relocated from Wilbur Avenue cleanup in March; 18 vehicles with expired tags towed; police recover 3 stolen vehicles from location; advocate complains, acting city manager explains

By Allen D. Payton

Some of Antioch’s homeless residents living in campers and motor homes that were cleared from Wilbur Avenue on March 22, 2024, relocated to private property in Antioch off Laurel and Neroly Roads, in the land next to Highway 4 along the creek. Posts on social media on Monday, April 8, 2024, showed Antioch Police Officers on the scene clearing the new encampment. Accusations were made by both the unhoused that officers blocked in the campers, not allowing them to leave and instead, towed some of the vehicles.

Local homeless advocate, Nichole Gardner drove to the site during Monday’s abatement and spoke with one of the residents named Harry who said, “they gave us notice, then the blocked the gate not letting anyone get out.”

She also asked an officer why there were no members of Antioch’s Care Team on site at the time, referring to them as “the purple people” as they dress in purple-colored shirts. He directed her to speak to other City staff. Gardner posted two videos of her visit to the site. See video 1 & video 2. (WARNING: Graphic language)

Acting City Manager and Economic Development Director Kwame Reed was asked about the City’s efforts. In response he wrote, “The City of Antioch, along with our Contra Costa County partners, conducted an abatement operation that recovered stolen property and more than a dozen vehicles. The operation also allowed us to offer services to community members in a homeless encampment.

The encampment in the Lindsey Detention Basin has continued to grow over the past few months. In that time, officers recovered three stolen vehicles and located a stolen ATM.

On April 3rd, Antioch officers and the Angelo Quinto Community Response Team (“Care Team”) visited the area and met with nearly a dozen people at the encampment. Over the next few days, officers and the Care Team continued to check in and offer services.

During the operation, Code Enforcement, the Care Team, Public Works, and the County’s C.O.R.E. Outreach team worked together to conduct the abatement. 18 vehicles with expired vehicle registrations were towed. Officers located two striped motorcycles and an industrial floor sweeper, all suspected of being stolen.

Through this multi-faceted approach, we were able to clear the area of trash, debris, and abandoned vehicles. We want to thank our community partners for their support in this effort.”

Questions were sent Tuesday evening to Reed, Department of Public Safety and Community Resources Director Tasha Johnson and Jazmin Ridley, the City’s Unhoused Resident Coordinator.

They were asked:

1. Since the 18 vehicles were towed, where are the homeless residents expected to live until they can pay the registration, towing and storage fees to recover them? Won’t they end up on city streets living in tents instead?
2. Also, couldn’t the City provide at least the vehicle registration fees from some of the funds in the budget for unhoused residents, as one way to help them stay off the street?
3. While the land in the Lindsey Detention Basin is privately owned, it appears some of the homeless residents living in RV’s relocated from Wilbur Avenue following the abatement there on March 22, isn’t the result of the City’s actions simply moving them from place to place, since the City has no place for them to locate?
4. What is the City doing to provide for a location for homeless residents – as was previously proposed on city-owned property such as the lot on Fitzuren Road when the City had the five state-donated trailers – to live in their RV’s while working with the county’s CORE team to help them move into permanent housing?
5. Or is the City merely hoping they will relocate out of Antioch?
6. Finally, what services did Antioch’s Care Team and the county’s CORE Team provide to the residents?

Attempts to reach Gardner for additional comment were unsuccessful prior to publication time.

Please check back later for any responses to this report.