With experience in law enforcement, private sector and government he offers common-sense views unlike his left-leaning opponent

By Allen D. Payton, Publisher

In the race for Contra Costa County Supervisor District 5 seat held by Federal Glover who is retiring after six consecutive terms, Antioch Councilman Mike Barbanica is clearly the best choice to replace him. He faces Pittsburg Councilwoman Shanell Scales-Preston in the November run-off, after both made it past the four-candidate March primary election. The district includes the county’s northern waterfront cities and communities from the Senator John A. Nejedly-Antioch Bridge in East County to Hercules in West County.

Scales-Preston is Too Socialist and Progressive

Scales-Preston has some applicable experience having served as a councilmember and rotated vice mayor and mayor for the City of Pittsburg for the past six years, as well as on the four transportation boards serving East County, three for just the past two years, as past president and current member of the East Bay League of California Cities, and chair of the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee. That committee worked with the now defunct healthcare district where Antioch Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe was the executive director for which the County Board of Supervisors settled with two of his female employees over sexual harassment claims for $350,000.

According to her bio on the City of Pittsburg’s website, Scales-Preston grew up in the City of Pittsburg graduated from Pittsburg High School and earned a degree in Political Science with an option in Pre-Law from Cal State East Bay. Her career has been in government, working for over 20 years as a staff member for both former Congressman George Miller and now Congressman Mark DeSaulnier.

That’s one of the challenges I have with Scales-Preston. Unlike her current boss, DeSaulnier who was a restaurateur in Concord before getting elected to local, then state and now federal office, Shanelle hasn’t worked in the private sector. So, she can’t truly understand what it takes to create jobs or wealth and grow the economy. That’s what is one of the key issues that needs to be addressed in District 5, especially along the waterfront.

Another issue I have with Scales-Preston is her political alliances and from whom she has accepted and promotes endorsements. They include Our Revolution East Bay, which according to their website, ourrevolutioneastbay.org, is “a progressive political organization that emerged from the historic Bernie Sanders campaign.” Sanders for decades described himself as a democratic socialist and has been the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate, except when now-Vice President Kamala Harris was serving. Those are not the kind of bigger, more expensive government views we need on the Board of Supervisors.

That brings up another issue, the blatant injection of partisan politics into local, non-partisan races, which I’ve harped on for the past 12 years, ever since Antioch Councilwoman Monica Wilson put her face and name on one side of a mailer and Obama’s on the other. Scales-Preston’s running a billboard ad on Highway 4 in Antioch with her face on one side of the ad and Harris’ on the other side. That’s completely inappropriate, and unnecessarily, and foolishly divisive. Scales-Preston also touts the endorsements of several Democratic Party organizations, including the State Party which surprisingly is opposing Prop. 36, the anti-crime measure, on the November ballot.

Finally, the other alliance and endorsement Scales-Preston promotes in her campaign is from the nation’s top abortion provider, Planned Parenthood. As I called out District Attorney Diana Becton for doing the same in 2022, I’m calling out Shanelle. Why would a Black woman take the endorsement of an organization founded in racist eugenics which by Margaret Sanger who spoke about and worked to eliminate the Black and brown races, which includes Hispanics, and has been very successful. Because the majority of abortions in the U.S. each year are by Black and Hispanic mothers. That’s why Planned Parenthood continues to focus and located their so-called “clinics” in neighborhoods with high populations of African- and Hispanic Americans. Scales-Preston is literally siding with the organization that continues to work against her own people of color. (Please see Margaret Sanger: Ambitious Feminist and Racist Eugenicist, https://womanisrational.uchicago.edu/2022/09/21/margaret-sanger-the-duality-of-a-ambitious-feminist-and-racist-eugenicist/)

While I like her and find that she’s a nice lady in our few conversations, Shanelle is seriously misdirected in her thinking and views and needs some experience with a job in the private sector before running either for re-election or higher office, again.

Backed by the Badge, Councilman, Former Cop, Business Owner Barbanica is Better and Best for the Board

Barbanica, on the other hand, has a much broader career experience having served as an officer and retired lieutenant after 21 years with the Pittsburg Police Department, where he helped fight against eight dirty cops, one of whom is still in prison for murder. He also worked as a sexual assault detective and a homicide detective, where he “helped women in the worst times of their lives,” Barbanica stated. That included saving a 13-year-old girl from repeated sexual assaults from an older man. He also ran the traffic division, oversaw not only Code Enforcement and all the other specialized enforcement units, including gangs, alcohol and tobacco, and street-level drug dealing teams.

He developed and led a six-officer team for six years, that worked on violent and street-level crime, which was reduced by almost 24% over a few years. Barbanica also ran the K-9 and Field Training Officer programs, and the Emergency Operations Center working with the FBI after 9-11 to prevent any terrorist attacks inside local industrial plants.

For the past 19 years he’s owned a successful, local real estate business in both residential and commercial sales, property ownership and management, the appropriately named Blue Line Property Real Estate & Management. That has given him the experience of dealing with renters and owners, understanding the issues that both sides have to deal with.

For the past four years, Barbanica has also served on the embattled Antioch City Council where he’s been the mature voice of reason in spite of the chaos, cronyism and corruption in which he did not participate. Nor can he be blamed for it, as he was on the short end of a variety of 3-2 and 4-1 votes while at the same time he was able to push for and successfully obtain majority votes in favor of his proposals, such as body cameras for police officers and dash cams for their vehicles, and tougher penalties for sideshows. In fact, Barbanica was the one who found common ground with the mayor to include penalties for advertisers planners, participants and spectators, as well.

He also pushed for expanding Antioch’s Code Enforcement by seven officers, doubling it to 14.

Barbanica has developed private-sector solutions to the challenge of homelessness in our county. He worked to revise the existing HUD contract with the County “to make it more palatable for owners to want to do business with homeless residents,” he said. “The program was actually my wife’s idea. We started with one single mom with her children, one of whom is disabled, and who are still housed with us, today.”

They expanded it to include homeless veterans.

“We work with seven different agencies to get people off the street and today, we have over 575 people housed that were facing homelessness or instability, who now have a roof over their head,” the candidate shared.

Barbanica’s platform focuses on his top priorities which are public safety, homelessness and blight.

Asked about economic development he said, “It’s always a constant. But we have to deal with the other issues, first. If we want business to come here, we have to provide them a place where their business will thrive.”

Regarding the Northern Waterfront Initiative, “It needs retooling,” Barbanica stated. “Because the zoning doesn’t match the long-term plans and developers have struggled and are very frustrated with the County. I’m going to be an advocate to develop that area and work with those developers but balance it with the concerns for the environment.”
He will also work on the Green Empowerment Zone, “to bring green jobs into our county to boost our local economy,” he added.

Barbanica also worked to bringing in 1,100 new, upscale homes in the Sand Creek area of Antioch in which “both sides, the developer and the environmental community, specifically Save Mt. Diablo, were satisfied,” following multiple meetings.

About transportation, he says supports extending BART to Tracy and back to Pleasanton, as well as completing the Highway 4 bypass / extension and building Route 239 from Brentwood to Tracy to connect Highway 4 to I-5, 205 and 580, “an East Bay loop” he said. It will permanently open East County for economic development. “Finally, it’s being planned after being on the books for almost 65 years,” Barbanica added.

Not surprisingly, he has the support of law enforcement, including Contra Costa County Sheriff David Livingston, the Contra Costa County Deputy Sheriffs Association, Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Association, Contra Costa County District Attorney Investigators’ Association, California Association of Highway Patrolmen, PORAC – Police Officers Research Association of California, as well as the Police Officers Associations of Antioch, Pittsburg, Concord, Martinez, Hercules, Brentwood, Clayton, Moraga, Pinole, Pleasant Hill, Richmond and Walnut Creek and the United Professional Firefighters of Contra Costa County.

Regarding the police scandals that affected both the Antioch and Pittsburg Police Departments, one thing needs to be clarified. When Antioch’s mayor and one councilwoman were irresponsibly and publicly calling for all 35 Antioch officers caught up in the racist text scandal to be fired – most of whom merely received the texts, but didn’t send any, and before the investigations were completed, and most returned to their jobs – Barbanica was again, the voice of reason. He said he, the mayor and other council members needed to shut their mouths and let the investigators work through the process, and not give the dirty, guilty cops anything they could use to keep their jobs, such as claiming their terminations were politically motivated. Yet, his opposition has been attempting to twist his words to mean something he didn’t.

One additional thing I like about him, having dealt and worked with with him in a councilman-reporter relationship for the past four years, Barbanica is available and responds to phone calls, texts and emails including any and all questions no matter how challenging. I respect that in an elected official.

“I truly believe the media’s responsibility is to keep government and politicians honest, and the people informed,” he stated. I completely agree.

On a personal note, Barbanica is married to Kristine, they have three children and six grandchildren, most of whom live in the area. Two of his children have followed him into law enforcement as his son is a Pittsburg Police Officer who “works my old beat with the same call sign assigned to it,” Barbanica shared. His youngest daughter is a prosecutor in another county in California. His older daughter is a physician’s assistant.

For the benefit of the northern portion and all of Contra Costa County, please join me in supporting Mike Barbanica as our next Supervisor representing District 5.

To learn more about him and his campaign visit www.mikebarbanica.com.

For additional mature, respectful, responsible and experienced leadership

By Allen D. Payton, Publisher

After endorsing former Antioch City Manager Ron Bernal for mayor, yesterday, he’s just one of the three pieces needed to complete the puzzle that will provide our city with a new, common-sense direction. We also need former Antioch High School Principal Louie Rocha elected in District 2 and former Mayor and Councilman Don Freitas elected in District 3 to join Bernal in providing mature, respectful, responsible and experienced leadership with a new council majority.

Do I always agree with Rocha and Freitas? No. But on the major issues of dealing with crime by increasing our police force, helping grow our economy with well-

District 2 – King’s Dishonesty Disqualifies Her, Rocha is Right Choice for Council

In the race for the District 2 Council seat, which is being vacated by incumbent Mike Barbanica who is running for County Supervisor, I was willing to give Dominique King a chance, this year, after her failed campaign for school board against Rocha’s mother, Mary in 2022, in which she aligned herself with Councilwomen Monica Wilson and Tamisha Torres-Walker and the local, far-left, progressive wing of the Democratic Party, and was backed by Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe.

But I became quickly disappointed in her for starting off the campaign claiming to be something she’s not. In an effort to compete with Louie Rocha’s education bona fides, having 17 years of experience as the principal of Antioch High School, King is using the term “Educator” for her ballot designation, even though she hasn’t earned a four-year college degree, doesn’t have a teaching credential and isn’t a teacher at any school. She says that’s due to the fact she and her husband through their Lean In With The Kings marriage and family counseling business, she “educates” their clients. But just because the City Clerk granted her the right to use the term by making up an entire new definition for the word not found in any dictionary, King didn’t have to do that. She could have simply been honest and instead listed herself as an “Educational Advocate” and “Businesswoman”, which are both true.

Then, on the Form 460 finance statement for the period of July 1-Sept. 21, for King’s loan to her campaign, she didn’t show her and her husband’s business but instead, shows her occupation as “Columnist, Clayton Pioneer Newspaper,” which is very part time, as King has only written nine columns this year. Knowing the publisher, I guarantee you King isn’t earning a full-time salary from that local newspaper.

So, King’s stretch of the truth, which, frankly, is just a desperate act of dishonesty, is an automatic disqualifier as far as I’m concerned. But her alliances and views just make things worse. My fear if Dominique is elected is that she would merely continue helping lead Antioch on the same path it’s on, most likely siding with the two councilwomen who remain in their positions for the next two years until their terms are up.

As for King’s opponent, another first-time candidate for public office like Bernal, Louie Rocha, brings with him years of experience hiring and managing employees, dealing with budgets and all kinds of challenges, including interacting with the police department, as well as his community service, all while working collaboratively with others to achieve collective success. He truly has made a difference in Antioch and wants to continue to do so, this time, on the council.

Rocha’s slogan of “Focused on Our Future” is what we need for council members to do instead of the divisiveness of the past four years and Antioch’s history, to redirect the City from the path it’s currently on. His platform highlights the key priorities that need work and in correct order: Public Safety – “Hire Chief of Police, Restore police officer staffing, Reduce violent crime and Increase traffic enforcement;” Leadership & Governance – specifically, “Hire…other city leadership positions” and “Model civility, respect and integrity;” Economic Development – “Support local businesses, Grow new business development and Rebuild closed business buildings;” and Community Services, specifically, “Provide necessary resources to our unhoused community.”

Asked to clarify what he means by “Rebuild closed business buildings” Rocha said, “When businesses close up and leave their buildings they get boarded up and become blighted and attract homeless and others. We need to work to attract new businesses to fill the vacant buildings.”

Named after his father, Louis, Sr., the former principal has lived in Antioch for 55 years where he grew up and graduated from Antioch High, has a college degree, is married to Tammy who, together have twin adult sons. One son, Ruben is working with him on the campaign, and the other, Louis, III who, with his wife Ischia, made Jr. a grandfather of four, and they live in Florida.

Rocha says what we all know is true: “Decisions made today will determine the future of our beloved community. I’m committed to restoring city leadership and law enforcement staffing. I will focus on solutions to create a safe, healthy and inclusive community for all of our residents and businesses. Let’s move forward together and focus on our city’s future.”

From getting to know and working with him some over the past three decades, I know Rocha can and will do that for Antioch. That’s why endorsing him for City Council in District 2 is like the slogan in the Capital One Bank commercials, “the easiest decision in the history of decisions.” (No, the Herald wasn’t compensated for that mention – although it’s not a bad idea!). Seriously, please join me in doing the same when you vote in next Tuesday’s election.

To learn more about Rocha and his campaign visit https://louierocha.org.

District 3 –Webster Must Decide Which Side He’s On, Peterson’s a Possibility for Public Administration, Freitas for Antioch’s Future

In the race for the District 3 council seat, from which incumbent Lori Ogorchock was gerrymandered out, I know two of the candidates, Don Freitas and Antwon Webster, and have enjoyed getting to know about the third, Addison Peterson during the campaign. All three offer some good ideas and different life experiences. But I had to make a choice.

I endorsed Webster for the same seat in 2020 and he has an impressive background both in the military, as an Air Force veteran, and his work with the Army Corps of Engineers, as well as his ownership of a business in Houston, TX focused on management consulting, engineering and general subcontracting.

Webster has also served the community as a member of the City of Antioch Board of Administrative Appeals, for which he currently serves as vice chair, and serves as president of the Antioch-Chichibu Sister City Organization. He is also founder of the non-profit EastBay Forward Economic Development Association and is the former president of Kiwanis Club of the Delta-Antioch.

Plus, I like and agree with all of his platform. But my main challenge with Webster, as I have expressed to him, is he can’t seem to pick a side and is still wanting and willing to ally himself with the current mayor. So, should Antwon get elected, I don’t know on which side of the major issues he will end up nor how he will vote. That unpredictability is unsettling at a time that we need a new, dependable council majority and direction for our City.

As for Peterson, I appreciate the fact that he responded to and answered all of my questions about himself, his background and campaign platform. He has a compelling life story having been homeless as a child. While Peterson is new to the community, I don’t have a problem with that, as I only lived in Antioch three-and-a-half years before being elected to the city council, and as the top vote-getter, making me mayor pro tem from my first council meeting, and acting mayor during my second meeting, since Antioch’s mayor at the time, Joel Keller, had just been elected to the BART Board half way through his third term. Plus, at age 31, I was also the youngest council member in the county. So, his age and time as a resident in our city are not issues for me.

He also has a background in both government and non-profit organizations, currently working to represent farmers in California, which is a good thing. Plus, he’s educated with a Master’s in Public Administration.

My challenges with Peterson are his alliances and being backed by organizations such as the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) Action, which pushed for the unnecessary, citywide rent control policies and ordinances passed by the council, and is heavily backed by Democratic Party organizations, including the Marsh Creek Democratic Club which is also backing King and Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe. I have a serious challenge with any candidate injecting partisan politics into local, non-partisan office. Plus, his views align with the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, like Wilson and Torres-Walker. So, my concern is he will perpetuate the policies of the current council majority which has led to the city facing double-digit deficits in the next three fiscal years.

Plus, he wouldn’t commit to supporting the upscale housing in the Sand Creek area which are needed to complete Antioch’s housing mix and to attract business owners who will bring with them well-paying jobs for our residents to help them get out of the commute, each workday.

The other challenge I have with Peterson is, after multiple requests, he refused to provide me with his phone number, forcing me to only communicate with him via email. That’s frustrating for both a reporter and a constituent, as I live in District 3.

I wish Addison well in his future endeavors, but don’t think they should include serving on the city council, right now. My hope is he works in the private sector to gain more of an understanding of what it takes to create jobs and wealth, and the challenges businesses face with government regulation and taxation before running again. With his education and experience, perhaps, instead, he should consider a role in city management, rather than elected office. I hope we can still have the in-person meeting that we planned, for which I unfortunately, ended up being sick and had to reschedule but ran out of time.

My choice in the District 3 race is Don Freitas, Antioch’s former councilman and two-term mayor, who I have known for 30 years, since I first ran for and was elected to the city council seat his wife held and chose to vacate. He was, in turn, elected to my seat in 1998 when I chose to run for State Assembly instead. He also took my place on the East County and countywide transportation boards where he continued the work we had begun and helped complete the widening of Highway 4, as well as fund and build the State Route 4 Bypass / extension to Balfour Road in Brentwood, which included the new overpass and interchange with Highway 160 which travels north to the Senator John A. Nejedly-Antioch Bridge.

So, Freitas and I never served together, and Don and I haven’t always agreed on the issues. In fact, in 2008, I ran a write-in campaign for mayor to defeat him, because Jim Davis, who I was supporting, was running for a third time for mayor against Freitas but with an ineffective campaign. So, I jumped in, spent about $30,000 and beat up on Freitas’ record as mayor and garnered 8.5 percent of the vote, helping Davis win by just 1.5 percent.

But fortunately, Freitas didn’t go away and continued to be involved in the community. He came back four years later and ran for mayor again, even though I had encouraged him to instead run for council to demonstrate he’d learned some things about being more pro-business while out of office. But he lost that year to both Wade Harper who was elected, and the late Councilman Gary Agopian.

Since then, Freitas has continued to be involved in the community, primarily with the Antioch Historical Society, which I appreciate. While we still don’t see eye-to-eye on every issue, and over the years we have put our differences aside, worked together in some ways to benefit the community, we do agree on the main ones which he has outlined in his campaign. Freitas says, “My Top Priority: Provide essential services to residents. Protecting residents starts with a cultural change in our police department and filling patrol officer positions.” I agree. The other priorities of his campaign platform include filling the “budgeted, vacant City staff positions.” Plus, Freitas wants “a completely transparent public accounting of funds” and to “conduct a thorough financial audit.” That must be done to address the structural, annual budget deficit the City is facing.

Don not only brings with him his years in both government as the County’s Clean Water Manager and as an elected official, first as a Board Member for the Contra Costa Water District, but also the strength to stand up for what needs to be confronted, and the experience and results to get things done.

On his campaign website he writes, “Many issues in Antioch are not being addressed and citizens are demanding positive change. Residents are tired of the chaos that’s occurred during the past several years. The chaos has divided us – not unified us. Residents are frustrated with: dangerous and illegal sideshows, violations of public meeting laws by our elected officials, increased homelessness, police misconduct, and a revolving door of city staff departures that have deteriorated public services to citizens.” I completely agree.

The life-long Antioch native and resident whose father was a Contra Costa Deputy Sheriff, Freitas is married to former Antioch Councilwoman Cathryn Freitas, and they have one adult son, Patrick. Don is a graduate of U.C. Davis with a major in Political Science/Public Service.

Finally, he shares, “I want to be the change we need to turn our city around. Let’s be proud to call Antioch home.” I too want to be proud to call Antioch home, once again. Don’t you? If so, please join me in supporting and voting for Don Freitas for Antioch City Council in District 3.

To learn more about Freitas and his campaign visit https://freitasforantioch.org.

Bernal, Rocha and Freitas Must All Be Elected

To summarize my endorsements for Antioch’s council leadership, with the elections of Ron Bernal as mayor and Louie Rocha in City Council District 2 and Don Freitas in District 3, Antioch can and will have a new majority of mature, respectful, responsible and experienced leadership, providing our city with the common-sense direction it so desperately needs.

City ran deficits three out of four years he’s been mayor and are projected to increase

By Allen D. Payton

In the slate mailer entitled, “Budget Watchdogs Newsletter” received by voters this past week, which Antioch Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe’s campaign paid for him to appear on, he claims to be “A fighter for fiscal responsibility” and “has delivered balanced budgets over the last four years and helped build a rainy day fund of over $63 million.”

The first claim has been determined to be false while the second is considered accurate. The mayor was twice asked about both of his claims, but he did not respond.

Rainy Day Fund – Accurate
According to the City staff report for the General Fund Budget Stabilization Fund in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-25 Budget adopted by the council on June 13, 2023, “In fiscal year 2018, the City established a Budget Stabilization Fund to set aside monies for future budget variances, unexpected occurrences, emergencies and the like. General Fund reserves over 20% of unassigned fund balance were used to establish the fund and future General Fund unassigned reserves over 20% can be moved into this fund. Per City Council direction, beginning in fiscal year 2020, these funds will be used to pay the difference in the full Actuarial Determined Contribution for OPEB payments from the pay as you go costs currently made by the City to address the unfunded liability for OPEB.”

OPEB refers to Other Post-Employee Benefits for retirees.

When asked about the claim of the “rainy day fund” without mentioning who made it, City Finance Director Dawn Merchant responded, “I am not sure about the claim as we do not have a $63M rainy day fund. I can only assume that claim is adding the Stabilization Fund and General Fund reserves, however, again, I am not sure.”

She also shared, “As of 7/1/24, the Budget Stabilization Fund balance is $37,627,378.” On that same date, the General Fund reserves balance was $32,555,999. So, by adding the two the total was $70,183,377 which supports the mayor’s claim as accurate.

UPDATE: Later, Merchant shared, “The $32,555,999 beginning fund balance is based on the revised FY24 budget, so that is not an actual, that is a projected based on the FY24 budget. Once the books for 6/30 are wrapped up, we will have the actual ending 6/30/24 fund balance.”

Balanced Budgets Claim – False
However, Hernandez-Thorpe’s claim he “has delivered balanced budgets over the last four years” is false. Because the budgets approved by the City Council for the current and past two of the four years during his term as mayor, have spent or are spending more than the City has been or is receiving in sales, property and other tax revenues. The budgets include the following deficits:
$3,995,625 in FY2022-23.
$5,343,928 in FY 2023-24; and
$4,617,143 projected for the current, FY 2024-25.

That last amount is being covered by the Budget Stabilization Fund.

City Budget Projects Increasing Deficits
In addition, according to the General Fund Projections for 2023-2028 presented to the city council on June 11, 2024, the General Fund is projected to run the following deficits:
$12,995,259 in FY 2025-26;
$13,561,074 in FY 2026-27; and
$14,855,649 in FY 2027-28.

The first two are expected to be covered by transfers from the Budget Stabilization Fund, but it will only cover $1,253,902 in the third year of what could be Hernandez-Thorpe’s second term as mayor if he’s re-elected because that Fund will be depleted in FY 2028. That would result in a projected net deficit for the City of $13,601,748 by June 30, 2028, which would be covered by the General Fund reserve leaving it with an Ending Balance of just $17.4 million or 17.06% in reserves versus over 31% and 32% for the previous fiscal years.

The mayor faces two challengers in the campaign, former Antioch city manager, Ron Bernal and second-time candidate for mayor, Rakesh Christian.

The election is November 5th.

Please check back later for any updates to this report.

Claims Jovita Mendoza won’t respond to request to “revoke the flyer”; ally of Antioch Mayor Pro Tem Monica Wilson

Editor,

I am writing to clarify the situation of a political flyer that has been distributed including a photograph of Jovita Mendoza and myself.  In my position as a Priest of the Diocese of Oakland, the Pastor of St. Ignatius of Antioch Parish of Antioch, and the Lead Chaplain for the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, I am not allowed to support or endorse any candidate for public office nor give the impression that I do so.  The flyer in question gives the impression that I do support Jovita Mendoza for public office, and it is not true.  My consent and permission to make use of my photograph for that flyer was never sought or given.

More than a week ago, I sent her an email requesting that she revoke the flyer and clarify that she used my photograph with her fraudulently to suggest that as the fire chaplain (and possibly a priest) that I do in fact endorse and support her effort to win a seat on the Brentwood City Council.  Nothing could be farther from the truth.  I write to you today to make sure that my parishioners, the members of our diocese, and the citizens of East County that I have not

violated the directives given to me by both my Bishop and the Fire Chief.  My hope is that this incident would give the citizens of Brentwood pause as to who this person really is and her disregard for ethics, professionalism, morality, and fitness for the position she seeks.

Father Robert Rien

Pastor

St. Ignatius of Antioch Parish

and

Lead Chaplain, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District

As mail-in ballots have now arrived at voters’ homes, I felt it was important to voice why I strongly support Fernando Sandoval for re-election as Board Trustee for the Contra Costa Community College District, Ward 5.

His area of the district includes the communities of Pittsburg, Antioch, Bay Point, Oakley, Discovery Bay, Byron, Clyde and Clayton and Brentwood where I lived for 43 years. I am also a professor of World Languages at Los Medanos College where I have been teaching for nearly 40 years which is the primary campus in Trustee Sandoval’s district along with the Brentwood campus. I personally know the challenges students face in striving to reach their educational goals, as well as the opportunities an education provides in advancing their futures. 

I first met Fernando Sandoval in 2016 in the East County community. I was impressed with his commitment to cultural awareness, student success, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds. I also appreciated his understanding of how the college campus, students’ families and the community at large need to work together to ensure that students achieve their goals.

In past years, the district has dealt with budgetary challenges, faculty contract disputes, district leadership turnover and the decrease in student enrollment numbers, to name a few. When Trustee Sandoval was elected in 2020, he brought a high level of visionary leadership, positive collaboration, commitment, integrity and a strong work ethic needed to help guide the District in a proactive pathway.

Fernando also brought over 25 years of professional expertise in the banking, finance and technology industries to cooperatively address the budget deficit issues facing the District, including with members of the Board of Trustees. Through most of his four-year tenure, his financial knowledge and leadership have been extremely valuable in helping to guide budgetary and policy decisions, particularly during the unprecedented impact of Covid-19.

Trustee Sandoval has been open to listening to faculty leadership and classified staff in understanding our key priorities so a supportive learning environment can be created for students. But just as importantly, he has been accessible to students to listen to their concerns and suggestions for improving issues and engaging students in the Board’s policy-making process.  I have met many civic leaders and community residents who have said how refreshing it is to have a college board leader who is so visible and engaged in meeting and listening to their thoughts at neighborhood meetings and community events.

His commitment to ensuring the college district and the community is reflective in his solution- based decision-making and is why he was honored for his public service with the 2020 Cesar Chavez Award for Exemplary Community Service presented by Los Medanos College.

Trustee Fernando Sandoval “walks his talk!” He is totally committed to a “student for success” approach! These past four years he has shown to be a leader we can respect and count on!  He brings strong leadership with an innovative vision for solutions for the students and residents of Contra Costa County.

I encourage my fellow voters to re-elect Fernando Sandoval as Board Trustee of the Contra Costa Community College District on November 5th!

Dr. Laurie Huffman Leyva

Faculty, Los Medanos College

Resident, Brentwood

By Katherine Piccinini

My pledge to the people of Contra Costa District 10 is to be Putting the People First. The incumbent has made it very clear, as Chevron prepares to leave San Ramon for Texas, he, the incumbent, is putting state and federal policies first. (See related article)

When we think of a large company moving away from its long-term home area, there are many challenges to be considered, such as: loss of revenue from the move, stress of relocating families, children’s emotional and educational issues and the strain on families having to start over. In the incumbents’ words, “I hope as Chevron relocates their corporate facilities, they will keep California’s climate goals in mind.” Really? With all the overwhelming human factors involved, the executives should keep our state’s climate goals in mind. Again, really?

Chevron’s achievements in pursuing and investing in alternative energy sources was have been well defined touching on areas of solar, wind, biofuel, geothermal and hydrogen. Have these pursuits been unacceptable? This is all part of reducing so-called “greenhouse emissions” as we continue to rely on naturally formed, carbon-based oil, often referred to as fossil fuels. Chevron has been at odds with California State regulators and politicians over fossil fuels and climate change for years. Because they want Chevron to be a diverse energy company investing in clean renewable energy does not mean that Chevron has not put forth great alternatives. California is considered to be one of the most progressive energy states but, we shouldn’t allow “cancel culture” to override reasonable considerations.

And that is the problem. It is California policies that are driving residents and companies elsewhere. This move was known since 2022. Chevron has been in California for 140 years and in San Ramon since 2002. Chevron cited that California policies have hurt consumers, and they feel this is not good for the economy so they will seek greener pastures. Also, there appears to be something more ominous on the horizon as California’s Energy Commission is considering taking over oil refineries and operations in the Golden State. May that be the bigger threat to Chevron and possibly other private industries?

We will miss this “oil giant” and all that it has brought to our district in stimulating the economy, jobs and stepping forward to pursue energy alternatives for our state.

Piccinini is a candidate for Congress in District 10 which includes the southern portion of Antioch and most of the cities and communities in Central and Eastern Contra Costa County.

In the City where “Opportunity Lives”, give the new council members the opportunity to make the decision

By Allen D. Payton

With less than 90 days until the election on November 5th when two new Antioch City Council members will be elected and a new mayor could be elected, it’s too late for the current council to make the decision to hire the new, permanent city manager.

District 2 Councilman Mike Barbanica is running for county supervisor instead of re-election and District 3 Councilwoman Lori Ogorchock can’t run for re-election because she was gerrymandered out of her district by the council majority in 2022. Plus, Mayor Lamar Hernández-Thorpe is running for re-election while facing a formidable challenger in former city manager, Ron Bernal who could very possibly win.

Why should those three council members help choose the city manager who the three new council members would be working with for the next four years? The answer simply is, they shouldn’t. Plus, both Barbanica and Ogorchock have stated they agree the next council should make the decision. He said on Tuesday, August 13, 2024, “That has always been my stance.”

What if the new council majority doesn’t click with the new city manager? They would be forced to work with the person or terminate the contract costing the City and wasting taxpayer funds by paying the severance, which is usually 12 to 18 months of a city manager’s salary.

The one good thing, this time, is the council hired a company to conduct a nationwide search. But they waited too long to get started, after the previous city manager, Con Johnson, who was hired without a nationwide search, was promoted from acting city manager on Oct. 26th immediately before the 2022 election, placed on administrative leave on March 17, 2023, and then resigned effective July 14, 2023. Part of the challenge and delay was the council could only find one search firm to submit a bid to take on the responsibility.

The mayor and council majority could argue the point that they need to make the decision, now to comply with the six-month deadline by the county’s Civil Grand Jury from their report issued in June. But it would be the height of arrogance for the current council to make such a decision impacting the two new council members and possibly three, including a new mayor, without their input. I’m pretty sure the Grand Jury would both understand and give the new council a little more time to comply, knowing that a change in leadership and direction of the city has occurred which won’t cause more of the same concerns to the jurors.

If Hernández-Thorpe is that confident he will be re-elected, then he’ll recognize the city will be fine for a few more months operating under the day-to-day leadership of Acting City Manager and Economic Development Director Kwame Reed and limping along with an interim police chief, two other acting department heads and an acting assistant city manager, and the mayor will wait. The other two council members, Mayor Pro Tem and District 4 Councilwoman Monica Wilson and District 1 Councilwoman Tamisha Torres-Walker will still be involved in the decision even after the election. If the mayor is re-elected, he too will have a say, which can occur right after the council meeting in December when the new members are given their oaths of office.

But we’ll see what the three decide and hopefully they won’t repeat their past action when they appointed the previous city manager less than two weeks before the last council election. They must give the new council the opportunity – which the City’s slogan claims, “Lives Here” – to make the decision to hire a new city manager.

International Trade Commission protecting America’s innovation edge

By Frank Cullen

A little-known federal agency might be our most powerful asset in the race for global tech leadership. The International Trade Commission has the power to deter patent infringement abroad and at home by blocking infringers’ access to the huge American market.

It’s up to policymakers to make sure this asset gets deployed to the full extent of the law.

Here’s the problem: In today’s knowledge economy, ideas are the coin of the realm. But America’s intellectual property is under constant attack.

That’s because a 2006 Supreme Court decision, eBay v. MercExchange, severely curtailed the rights of IP owners. Previously, patent holders could easily stop infringers with court orders, called injunctions, preventing the sale of knock-off products that illegally incorporated patented technology.

But the eBay case changed the procedure for obtaining a court injunction. Patent holders now must prove that money alone can’t make them whole for the damage the infringement caused. Though intended to curb certain types of abuse of injunctive authority, the decision unintentionally made it nearly impossible for legitimate innovators to stop infringement, often leaving them with the sole option of pursuing lengthy legal battles for financial compensation.

Enter the ITC. This body wields the power to swiftly bar infringing foreign-manufactured products from the U.S. market entirely. For a government body, the ITC moves fast, typically resolving cases in 12 to 18 months, compared to the years-long slog of district court litigation.

Its administrative law judges are experts in complex patent issues and can grant exclusion orders now mostly unavailable in federal courts. This combination of speed, expertise, and decisive action makes the ITC an increasingly important venue for companies seeking to protect their innovations from copycats.

Established in 1916 as the U.S. Tariff Commission, the ITC has evolved alongside the American economy as we transitioned from a manufacturing powerhouse to an innovation-driven economy.

This evolved role was on full display in a recent high-profile case. When medical device maker Masimo accused the Apple Watch of infringing its blood oxygen monitoring patents, it turned to the ITC. The result? An import ban on infringing Apple Watch models that held Apple to account promptly. The ban demonstrates the ITC’s ability to check the power of even one of the world’s most dominant companies.

The ITC’s role is crucial to preserving America’s innovative edge. When a biotech startup pours its resources into a potentially life-saving drug, or when a telecom company invests billions in 5G technology, they need to know their intellectual property will be protected. The ITC’s ability to swiftly block infringing products creates a powerful deterrent against IP theft.

Critics of the ITC argue that its powers could potentially be used to stifle competition or harm consumers. But while there’s always a delicate balance between protecting innovation and protectionism, the ITC has built-in safeguards, starting with a public-interest requirement to weigh factors like health, safety, and competitive conditions into its decisions. It’s not a blunt instrument, but a precision tool designed to protect innovation while preserving fair competition.

As we look to the future, strengthening and modernizing the ITC should be a priority. This could involve increasing its resources to handle a growing caseload, streamlining its procedures, and potentially expanding its authority. We also need to educate our innovators more fully about the ITC as a forum for IP protection.

The future of American technological leadership depends on the choices we are making now — in policy, investment, and legal strategy.

Frank Cullen is executive director of the Council for Innovation Promotion. This originally ran in The Hill.