Police investigate the scene of the fatal hit-and-run collision on Wilbur Avenue on Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2025. Photo courtesy of ContraCosta.news
Police pursue lead on suspect’s vehicle
By Lt. Joe Njoroge #7052, Antioch Police Field Services Division
Antioch police investigators are searching for the driver behind a deadly hit-and-run collision. On January 14, 2025, at approximately 6:08 p.m., Antioch Police officers responded to a report of a hit-and-run in the 3000 block of Wilbur Avenue. Callers reported that a pedestrian had been struck by a vehicle, which left the scene.
Officers and paramedics arrived and found an adult female victim approximately 68-year-old unresponsive on the ground. Life-saving measures were attempted, but unfortunately, the victim died. The Contra Costa County Coroner’s Office has provided Antioch Police with the victim’s name. But they are waiting to release it pending notification of next of kin, Sgt. Rob Green shared. She was born in 1957 but had no identification with her.
Traffic accident investigators were called to take over the investigation. The roadway at Hwy 160 was closed for several hours. This investigation is ongoing, and the cause of the collision has not yet been determined. The case is still in the preliminary stages, and the names of the parties involved are not being released at this time. Green also said police have a lead on the suspect’s vehicle and will provide additional information as he has it.
Anyone with information is asked to call the Antioch Police Department non-emergency line at (925) 778-2441 or Traffic Collision Investigator Sergeant Green at (925) 779-6864, email rgreen@antiochca.gov.
SACRAMENTO, CA — In a pivotal ruling for parental rights, U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez refused to dismiss a class-action lawsuit against California’s controversial policies requiring educators to keep parents uninformed when their children express gender confusion or request to change their names and pronouns at school. The decision, handed down on January 7, 2025, denies the motions filed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta and the California Department of Education to throw out the case by arguing that gender secrecy policies were “just a suggestion,” and not mandated on school districts. Now the suit can move forward toward potentially overturning the state’s ban parent notification policies with the passage of AB 1955 last year.
Teachers Not Required to Keep Secrets from Parents In a powerful statement addressing the rights of educators, Judge Benitez clarified that teachers are under no obligation to follow policies that compel them to deceive or withhold information from parents. Judge Benitez emphasized that “teachers do not completely forfeit their First Amendment rights in exchange for public school employment.” He noted that while teachers may be required to deliver specific curricula, the government cannot force them to act unlawfully or infringe on parental rights. Benitez agreed with the plaintiffs that state policies compel them to act in ways that are “intentionally deceptive and unlawful,” violating the teachers’ First Amendment rights.
Upholding Parents’ Constitutional Rights Judge Benitez also emphasized long-standing constitutional protections for parents in the upbringing and health decisions of their children. “Parents’ rights to make decisions concerning the care, custody, control, and medical care of their children is one of the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests that Americans enjoy,” he wrote, rebuking the state’s argument that parents have no fundamental right to be informed of their child’s gender identity at school. “However, under California state policy and EUSD policy, if a school student expresses words or actions during class that are visible signs that the child is dealing with gender incongruity or possibly gender dysphoria, teachers are ordered not to inform the parents.”
Ultimately, the judge denied the state’s efforts to dismiss the case, stating, “There are no controlling decisions that would compel this Court to limit or infringe parental rights, notwithstanding the State’s laudable goals of protecting children.”
The ruling directly challenges California’s “Parental Exclusion Policies,” which have allowed schools to hide critical gender identity information from families under the guise of student privacy. Judge Benitez concluded that parents have a constitutional right to know about their child’s gender incongruity, especially when such conditions could lead to significant mental health issues like depression or suicidal ideation.
Broad Implications for State Policy The lawsuit is now free to move forward, and if successful, it could dismantle policies statewide that currently compel educators to bypass parents on sensitive matters concerning gender identity. This would represent a significant victory for parental rights advocates who argue that these policies infringe on the fundamental rights of families and erode trust between parents and schools.
Legal Counsel Speaks Out Paul Jonna, Special Counsel for the Thomas More Society, Partner LiMandri & Jonna LLP,and a lead attorney on the case, hailed the decision as a milestone moment for parental rights. “We are incredibly pleased that the Court has denied all attempts to throw out our landmark challenge to California’s parental exclusion and gender secrecy regime,” Jonna said in a press release. “Judge Benitez’s order rightly highlights the sacrosanct importance of parents’ rights in our constitutional order and the First Amendment protections afforded to parents and teachers.”
Jonna emphasized the broader goal of achieving statewide relief for all parents and teachers affected by the secrecy policies, adding, “We look forward to continuing to prosecute this case against California Attorney General Rob Bonta and the other defendants, to put this issue to rest once and for all—by obtaining class-wide relief on behalf of all teachers and parents.”
Reaction from California Family Council Greg Burt, Vice President of the California Family Council, praised the ruling for upholding parental rights. “This decision is a critical step toward restoring the sacred bond between parents and children,” Burt stated. “When government policies force schools to keep secrets from families, they cross a dangerous line. Judge Benitez’s ruling reaffirms that parental rights are not a secondary concern but a cornerstone of our constitutional freedoms.”
A Collision of Rights Judge Benitez also addressed the tension between a child’s right to privacy and parents’ right to be informed. While acknowledging the competing interests, he concluded, “In a collision of rights as between parents and child, the long-recognized federal constitutional rights of parents must eclipse the state rights of the child.” This statement sets a clear precedent favoring parental oversight in matters of health and education.
Looking Ahead As Mirabelli v. Olson proceeds, the case is likely to garner increased attention, setting the stage for a broader examination of how states balance student privacy with parental rights. The outcome could redefine policies across California and potentially influence similar debates nationwide.
About California Family Council California Family Council works to advance God’s design for life, family, and liberty through California’s Church, Capitol, and Culture. By advocating for policies that reinforce the sanctity of life, the strength of traditional marriages, and the essential freedoms of religion, CFC is dedicated to preserving California’s moral and social foundation.
The Antioch City Council sans two councilwomen hear from a consultant on proposed water rate increases during their meeting on Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2025. Video screenshot
Discuss 10% annual water rate increases, set public hearing for March 11
“This is kind of a shock for people, 50% over five years” – District 3 Councilman Don Freitas.
Both councilwomen absent for first meeting of the year
By Allen D. Payton
During the first Antioch City Council meeting of the new year, on Tuesday, January 14, 2025, the new mayor and two members discussed and approved a variety of matters without the input or votes of both councilwomen who did not attend. Those included an agreement with former Interim Chief Brian Addington’s consulting firm for services to the police department and fees for concealed carry weapons. The council also heard a presentation on the process for recruiting a new, permanent police chief and another from the Parks and Recreation Department entitled, “What a Year It’s Been – Celebrating Our Year 2024.”
According to City Manager Bessie Scott, District 1 Councilwoman Tamisha Torres-Walker was sick and District 4 Councilwoman Monica Wilson was in Washington D.C. for a conference.
Approves Agreement with Addington’s Consulting Firm for Police Department
After just completing his time as Antioch’s interim police chief last Friday, Jan. 10, 2025, Brian Addington’s company, WBA Consulting was hired as the consultant to the police department to comply with the City’s recent agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice.
As previously reported, the council was asked to hire a “consultant team that can provide support, guidance, and advice in several areas, which will supplement and enhance the Antioch Police Department’s efficiency and effectiveness. The City requires assistance with overall project management for Police Department operations and administration, policy support, and special project implementation for not only day-to-day operations, but also with compliance efforts identified in the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) settlement agreement with the Antioch Police Department and City of Antioch dated January 2, 2025.” (See related article)
WBA Consulting was mentioned as part of his background in an introductory article about Addington when he was hired as interim police chief last February.
Other than one question from District 3 Councilman Don Freitas about the items in the agreement lined through that were eliminated from the final version, without discussion, the council approved the agreement 3-0, with Councilwomen Tamisha Torres-Walker and Monica Wilson absent.
Approves CCW Permit Fees
Under agenda item 6, according to Antioch Police Captain Desmond Bitner, who provided the City staff report to the council about setting fees for handling concealed carry weapons (CCW) permits, the majority of law enforcement agencies in California use software to expedite the process. As of January, under SB2 cities can increase fees. Permits have to be renewed every two years.
“These are basic numbers we’ve assessed and consulted other agencies,” Bittner We’re not making any money on this. We’re just breaking even to cover our costs.”
Only two members of the public spoke on the item, but neither chose to serve as the proponent or opponent for the public hearing which would have afforded them 10 minutes to speak.
“I was not aware what’s really going on,” said a woman who claimed to be a local leader for Gun Owners of America. “I get a little emotional when it comes to my right to carry. I grew up in this town. I left…then I came back. I feel incredibly unsafe in this town.”
“It’s cheaper for me to fly to Texas…to get the training,” she continued. “To hear the fees for me to exercise my constitutional right to carry…is appalling.”
“Police told me the applications are stacked so high, don’t even bother,” she added. “I just want actions, and I want answers. I shouldn’t have to wait a year-and-a-half.”
Resident Greg Farina who identified himself as the president of the Contra Costa Chapter of the California Rifle and Pistol Association said, “I’m very happy the City of Antioch is going through this. I just got my letter from Contra Costa County. It took me 15 months.”
“Yes, it’s expensive. I’m concerned about lower income folks. I will help you do anything and help sell what you’re doing,” he added.
Freitas asked Bittner, “do we actively have applications for the City of Antioch, now?”
“As far as I know, no,” the captain responded. “We averaged about five applications per year. The sheriff’s department processed for us on average 67 per year. We can get the knocked out in 90 days. If the applicant is being diligent in getting things done, we’ll be right there with them.”
“This will not impact the General Fund?” District 2 Councilman Louie Rocha asked. Mayor Ron Bernal responded, “No.”
“We respect the citizens right to carry,” Bittner added.
The council approved the item on a 3-0 vote.
Source: City of Antioch
Review Water Rates Study Including 10% per Year Increases & Set Public Hearing
Under Item 7 the council adopted a resolution to set a hearing for March 11th on water rate increases. City staff presented a Water Rates Study showing Antioch has the lowest single family monthly water bills of neighboring cities and a proposed increase of 10% per year on average. The City’s ratepayers get to provide their opinion to the council.
On Nov. 12, 2025, the previous council failed to approve the rate increases on a vote 2-1-1 with Councilwomen Lori Ogorchock and Monica Wilson voting yes, then-Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe voting no, Councilwoman Tamisha Torres-Walker voting to abstain and then-Councilman Mike Barbanica absent. (See Item 8 of the Meeting Minutes)
“If the council should accept these, is the funding sufficient to pay our bills on an annual basis?” Freitas asked.
“Yes,” Tom Pavletic of Pavletic Consulting responded.
The Water Use chart for Calendar Years 2023-29 shows a one percent increase in projected water use for Fiscal Year 2024 but a one percent decrease in FY2025-27 and a two percent decrease in FY2028 and 2029. “I don’t understand for three consecutive years you’re showing a decrease,” Freitas stated.
“We put 100 new accounts per year in this model. But it’s a matter of conservation. In the past 15 years your single-family user class has reduced 15%,” the consultant responded. “Your rates are going to go up about 10% per year. That’s going to result in conservation.”
“You’ve gone from 375 gallons per year to 250 gallons,” he added.
Bernal stated, “you’re using 100 units per year. That seems a little bit low…for projections.”
“We looked at past models and past growth and that’s what comes in,” Pavletic responded. “When I do water rate studies, I never use the General Plan.”
Freitas asked, “What we’re asking is for an increase of about 10% a year?”
“Yes,” Pavletic responded.
Freitas pressed staff on the debt service for the water department on the 2019 Construction Installment Sale Agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board for the Brackish Water Desalination Plant. “Antioch is one of the few cities with its own water plant…and we have this new state of the art facility coming online,” Finance Director Dawn Merchant stated.
“For debt service, if we fall below, it’s going to be with us for a long, long time,” Freitas stated. “This is a very dangerous thing to get to for infrastructure financing. Why did we not have rate increases for five years? I don’t get it.”
“There was a number of reasons. Initially and honestly, the water system has enough funds to continue,” said Acting Public Works Director Scott Buenting. “The same time as COVID was going on and giving the residents a break for two, two-year terms.”
“This is kind of a shock for people, 50% over five years,” Freitas stated. “I think we should do things incrementally…when we review the budget.”
“Are we taking into account the entire cost of the (brackish water) project?” Bernal asked. “Yes, Buenting responded.
Asked about the City purchasing less water from the Contra Costa Water District, Buenting responded, “That should be less.”
“Since we’re so close on our ratios we don’t want to have any surprises,” Bernal stated.
“When the water becomes brackish the desalination plant will be operational,” Buenting stated.
“This year?” Freitas asked.
“Yes. This year,” Buenting responded.
“I feel like we have no choice. The consumer cannot deal with these increases,” Freitas stated and made a motion to approve with Rocha later seconding the motion.
Public Comments on Water Rate Increases
“As a consumer, I don’t like it,” said resident Melissa Case. “But Don, you’re a blessing to this conversation. Now, I know where your strengths are. It looks like we have to find to pay our water bills.”
Former Councilwoman Ogorchock spoke next saying, “The council did not approve it. It was one abstention, two yesses and one no. That was the mayor. It wasn’t cost effective for our seniors, and I look out for our seniors.”
She asked about the effect of not voting for it and the possible move of $2 million into the enterprise fund.
Resident and local business owner Jim Lanter said the council had the responsibility for, “public safety, budget. We’ve got to make ourselves fiscally smart. I appreciate the questions, the tough questions. But nobody can afford 10%. I wish we had two-and-a-half percent a year.”
“Those little changes do matter. I would encourage the City to bring forward these rate hikes…and explore rate subsidies. We just have to fill that gap. There are plenty of opportunities out there,” Freitas stated.
“If there is any alternative flexibility for our seniors on fixed incomes,” Rocha mentioned. “This got kicked down the road. So, now we have to address what didn’t get done. But if we can look at our seniors and those who face the biggest struggle.”
“It gets to be a complicated legal issue if you use the enterprise fund to provide subsidies as it is a tax on other ratepayers,” Freitas mentioned.
“I do appreciate your expertise from your experience in the water industry,” Rochas said to Freitas who served on the CCWD Board for 16 years. “We probably should have taken action in 2023. But it is what it is and we have to address it.”
“I just want to make sure General Fund money has not been used to prop up the water fund,” Bernal asked.
“No,” Buenting responded.
“I think that 1.2% needs to be mentioned up front. For the public to understand,” Freitas added.
“I’d like to see something in the staff report to reflect what happens if we don’t pass this,” Bernal said to City Manager Bessie Scott.
The council then approved the process 3-0 which will include Hearing Notices being mailed out to account holders who get to provide input on the proposed rate changes. If written protests against the proposed rate changes are presented by a majority of the parcels or accounts, the city council will not enact the proposed changes. If a majority don’t protest, the council will then vote on a resolution to adjust rates and charges.
If approved, the new FY25 rates will begin May 1st and on Jan. 1, 2026, the new rates for FY 26 will be implemented. Then on July 1st of the following three fiscal years the rates for those years will be implemented.
Meeting Extended for Up to an Hour
The council then voted 3-0 to extend the meeting until midnight, one hour past the normal ending time of 11:00 p.m.
Discusses Annual Financial Reports
Under Item 9 the council considered the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024, inclusive of the City of Antioch Single Audit Reports for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024.
“We were deficit spending for the past several fiscal years. We broke even this year. Do we have reserves or are they decreasing? Are we in a financial bind?” Freitas asked.
“As of today, we are not in a financial bind,” Merchant responded.
“We are putting together the 2025-27 budget. I think we will still have that deficit. We are still pulling together the numbers. We will be drawing down on our reserves. The budget stabilization fund which are using the fill the gap should only be used one time,” she continued.
“The ARPA money from the pandemic that ends in April, right?” Freitas asked.
“They had to be obligated by the end of December. But we have until 2026 to spend them. There are some programs that end, like Opportunity Village, that contract ends in April,” Merchant responded referring to the homeless motel on East 18th Street. “We have to look and see how much was allocated to that to continue. Once the money is spent from ARPA it’s gone.”
Freitas asked about claims during the campaign of a $90 billion reserve fund.
“That money is there but you can see $46.4 million of the Budget Stabilization Fund is committed. You really need to look at the $36.5 million,” Merchant stated.
“That’s the really true reserve,” Freitas stated. “Not the $90 million.”
“It’s really supposed to be for one-time projects,” Merchant stated.
“As we go into the budget we have transparency,” Freitas requested of Bernal. “These are real impacts to real people. I’d like the opportunity to educate the staff…the public. If there isn’t any money those projects are in jeopardy.”
“I think lumping the two funds together is misleading,” Rocha stated. “When you look at the ARPA funds which is about 20% of our budget…that’s a significant amount. We’re going to have to look to work with the County. We have a responsibility to be fiscally solvent and spending down our reserves is not the way.
If we can continue the services to our unhoused community maybe we can take housing off the table.” “Hearing some of the things, tonight, unless we come together and have partnerships in the region, there are going to have to be some serious cuts,” the District 2 councilman continued. “I know that’s not popular. But I didn’t sign up to be popular. We’re going to have to look at grant writing. Bernal then mentioned amounts of the net pension liability and asked, “Can you explain what the net pension liability is?”
“Is what CalPERS calculates the ultimate liability we have to pay current employees until their descendants are no longer alive,” Merchant responded. They’re calculated on mortality rates.”
“Other post-employment benefits you provide medical…for those employees under that plan…they’re estimated we have to pay until those employees are deceased,” she added.
“Can we break out that amount…on an annualized cost?” Bernal asked. “Yes,” Merchant responded.
The council then voted 3-0 to receive and file the report.
Item 11, the proposed emergency City staffing positions, was tabled until the next council meeting.
Following comments by the city manager offering “kudos” to a variety of City staff members and committee reports by the councilmembers the meeting adjourned at 11:27 p.m.
Congrats to Park Middle School Cheer Team for winning 1st Place in the USA Regional Cheer Competition hosted at Deer Valley High School on Saturday January 11th. It’s one of the largest competitions in our area and PMS Cheer was the only local school to compete.
Way to represent Antioch Unified School District!
Park Middle School Cheer Team 2025 winners at the Deer Valley High School gymnasium on Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025.
“We were so excited to finally get to participate in this Regional competition, it’s hosted right here in Antioch. We had to show up and represent for our city and school. The girls have worked so hard to get to this point-we are so proud of them,” said Head Cheer Coach Ieshia West.
If you would like to support or donate to the Team in any way, please reach out to Park Middle School.
Join us this Martin Luther King Jr. Day as we spend “a day on, not a day off,” encouraging all Americans to volunteer to improve their communities. Let’s work together to build a stronger Antioch!
This Year’s Services Include: • Senior Day of Engagement – Antioch Senior Center | 415 W 2nd Street • Antioch Community Park Revitalization Project | 801 James Donlon Blvd. • Fremont Elementary School Community Project | 1413 F Street
New Antioch Mayor Ron Bernal, center, will lead his first regular council meeting and the first one of the new year, on Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2024. Herald file photo.
In compliance with USDOJ agreement; will consist of two former APD personnel
Will receive police chief recruitment presentation
Consider emergency staffing, converting 3 Code Enforcement Officers to other positions
By Allen D. Payton
During their first meeting of the year and the first regular meeting for the newly elected mayor and two members on Tuesday night, Jan. 14, 2024, the Antioch City Council will consider approving an agreement with WBA Consulting & Investigative Services for the police department to comply with the agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice. The amount of the agreement is not to exceed $225,000 through June 30, 2025, with a one-time extension for an additional six months for the same terms.
According to the City staff report for agenda Item 4, the “consultant team that can provide support, guidance, and advice in several areas, which will supplement and enhance the Antioch Police Department’s efficiency and effectiveness. The City requires assistance with overall project management for Police Department operations and administration, policy support, and special project implementation for not only day-to-day operations, but also with compliance efforts identified in the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) settlement agreement with the Antioch Police Department and City of Antioch dated January 2, 2025.” (See related article)
In addition, the staff report reads, “The services provided by WBA Consulting…will be provided by two former Antioch Police Department personnel who have been working within the department as Interim Chief and Interim Captain for the majority of the 2024 year. The team will continue to provide executive police management support and consultation to the Acting Chief and City Manager as it relates to mandatory compliance with relevant federal and state laws, regulations, and rules.”
Police Chief Recruitment Presentation & Process
Under Item 4, the council will be provided with a presentation by Bob Hall & Associates for the recruitment of a permanent police chief. As part of the process, in January and February the firm will Solicit City Council Feedback on Ideal Candidate, Hold Community-wide Feedback Forums (2 in person, 1 Online), Solicit Stakeholder Feedback from the Business Community, Youth & Schools, Faith-based Community, Antioch Police Officers Association and Oher Stakeholders.
The consultants will also Launch a Nationwide Recruitment, Conduct an Online Community Survey and Attend Community Forums for Additional Feedback in each Council District if Requested by Council Members.
Then in February and March Preliminary Screening of Candidates will occur, Candidate Resumes and Cover Letters will be Evaluated to Determine Experience and Education Most Closely Aligned to the City’s Desired Qualifications; the Recruitment Team Will Conduct Screening Interviews with Candidates to Assess which Applicants Should be Moved Forward to the City’s Selection Process and the Most Qualified Candidates will be Presented to the City for Consideration to be Invited to Participate in the Interview Panels.
In March the Candidates will Participate in the following Oral Assessment Panels: Professional Panel: Consisting Police Chiefs/City Managers Community Panel: Consisting of Community Members from Each District and a Staff Panel: Consisting of Leadership Team and other Key Staff Members
In March and April, Candidates Determined to be Most Aligned with the City’s Desired Qualifications will be Invited to an Initial Oral Interview with the City Manager and Additional Community Assessment. If necessary, Finalists will Participate in a Final Interview with the City Manager and then the City Manager will Make the Hiring Decision.
Finally, in April and May, the City will Conduct Background Investigations and other HR Functions and the New Chief Start Date will be Determined.
Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) License Fee
Under Item 6, the council will consider setting fees for a Carry Concealed Weapons License now that the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office is no longer providing the service to residents of cities.
According to the City staff report. “California Penal Code § 26155(a) requires ‘the chief or other head of a municipal police department of any city’ to issue ‘carry concealed weapons” (CCW) licenses to residents of the city so long as the applicant meets the legal requirements. California Penal Code § 26155(c) allows the chief to enter into “an agreement with the sheriff of the county in which the city is located for the sheriff to process applications for licenses, renewals of licenses, and amendments to licenses…”; however, the sheriff is not required to do this if the population of the county is over 200,000 people.
“For several years, the Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff received, processed, and issued CCW applications for residents of most of the municipalities in Contra Costa County, including the City of Antioch. Recently, the Sheriff advised the municipalities they would no longer be providing this service necessitating the City of Antioch Police Department to implement a CCW process.
“Pursuant to the California Government Code §66000 et seq., and California Penal Code §26190(b)(1), fees can be assessed to recoup an amount equal to the reasonable costs associated with processing CCW applications, issuing CCW licenses, and enforcing the license. The City of Antioch Master Fee Schedule, effective July 1, 2024, does contain a ‘Gun Permit Fee’; however, it is unknown the last time this particular fee was updated, and the established fee does not effectively recoup the costs associated with conducting this activity nor have the appropriate title.
The proposed fees are as follows: New Permit Initial Fee (refundable)- $261.50; Issuance Fee – $261.50; Renewal Permit – $455.00; Amended Permit – $64.00 and Duplicate – $30.00.
Emergency Staffing
Under Item 11, the council will consider approving funds for the following emergency staffing positions for the Finance Department, Human Resources Department, Office of the City Manager, Office of the City Clerk and Conversion of Computer Technician in Information Services: Payroll Specialist; Human Resources Manager; Human Resources Analyst; Public Records Coordinator; Assistant to the City Manager; and conversion of a Computer Technician to Administrative Assistant in Information Services.
The proposal includes conversion of three Code Enforcement Officer (“CEO”) positions.
Meeting Details
The council meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. with a Closed Session to discuss five matters including a significant exposure to litigation, conference with labor negotiators for the Antioch Public Works Employees Association (APWEA) Bargaining Unit, Public Employee Evaluations of the city manager and city attorney, as well as discussing of the police chief employment.
The regular meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers inside City Hall at 200 H Street in historic, downtown Rivertown. The meeting can also be viewed via livestream on the City’s website or on Comcast Local Cable Channel 24 or AT&T U-verse channel 99.
Acting Chief Joe Vigil (3rd from left) is joined by new Officers David Taylor, Brandon Michaud and Jose Collazo, with new Crime Analyst Larissa Lampi and Dispatcher Ma’Janae Brown on Monday, Jan. 13, 2025. Photos: APD
By Antioch Police Department
During a ceremony on Monday, January 13, 2025, three new Antioch Police officers were sworn in, as well as a crime analyst and dispatcher were added to the department.
A post on the APD Facebook page Monday afternoon reads, “Welcome to the Team! We are thrilled to introduce the newest members of our department:
Laurissa Lampi – Crime Analyst
Laurissa recently relocated from Colorado and now calls Concord home. She holds a Master’s Degree in Criminal Justice and brings over 10 years of experience as a death investigator and criminalist. Laurissa has worked on numerous suspicious death and homicide cases, including mass fatalities. She also served as an Arabic linguist in the United States Air Force for six years.
Fun Fact: Laurissa loves her Peloton bike and spending time at the beach!
Ma’Janae Brown – Dispatcher
Born in Richmond and one of seven siblings, Ma’Janae graduated from Cesar Chavez High School and later earned a Bachelor’s in Child Development and a Master’s in Business Administration from Sacramento State. Before joining APD, she worked as a dispatcher for Oakland Police Department. Ma’Janae is passionate about helping others and making a positive impact.
Fun Fact: Ma’Janae loves to travel and try new foods!
Chief Vigil introduces Laurissa Lampi and Ma’Janae Brown as the new officers look on.
David Taylor – Police Officer
David grew up in Oakland and San Leandro, graduating from Castro Valley High School. A lifelong athlete, he played football and baseball and earned a collegiate football scholarship. He holds a BA in Communications with a minor in Coaching and is also a licensed EMT. David prioritizes God, family, and his career.
Fun Fact: David collects props and memorabilia from his favorite film franchises, including Marvel, Harry Potter, and Star Wars!
Jose Collazo – Police Officer
Jose served as a Community Service Officer with APD for three years before becoming a Police Trainee. He’s a six-year veteran of the United States Army National Guard, where he served as a Chinook Helicopter Repairer. During his time in the National Guard, Jose completed a combat deployment and supported state missions during fire seasons.
Fun Fact: Jose enjoys spending time with family and friends.
Brandon Michaud – Police Officer
Brandon was born in Fairfield and grew up across the East Bay, including Brentwood and Oakley. A Freedom High School graduate, he played basketball before earning a degree in Criminal Justice from the Community College of Denver. Brandon’s goal is to become a homicide detective.
Fun Fact: Brandon is a huge Game of Thrones fan and considers himself unbeatable in trivia about the show!
Welcome Laurissa, Ma’Janae, David, Jose, and Brandon to the Antioch Police Department family! We’re excited to have you on board as we continue to serve our community with dedication and excellence.”
That brings the total sworn officers on the force to 83 out of 115 in the City budget.
Fundraiser for Boys Mentoring program By Anthony Randolph
A Martin Luther King Day event will be held on Monday January 20th, from 9:30 am to 12 noon at Grace Bible Fellowship of Antioch. It will be a great breakfast including shrimp and grits and a MLK, Jr. program. It is also a fundraiser for our Boys Mentoring program and all proceeds will help send them on a summer trip to Atlanta.
We are also having a Black History Contest open for all school age students in Contra Costa County. Below are some details but for complete details visit our website: www.gracearmsofantioch.org/mlkjr.
