Archive for November, 2017

BART Board to hear from public on Antioch extension ride costs and parking fees, Nov 16 & Dec 7

Thursday, November 9th, 2017

A two-car eBART train undergoes testing in the middle of Highway 4 between Hillcrest Avenue and A Street/Lone Tree Way on Friday evening, July 1, 2016 for the Pittsburg and Antioch extension. Herald file photo by Allen Payton

BART Director Joel Keller. Photo from BART.gov

By Joel Keller, District 2 Director, Bay Area Rapid Transit District

The BART Board will consider both BART to Antioch fares and BART to Antioch parking fees at a public hearing on November 16th meeting. On December 7th, the Board will be asked to approve the BART to Antioch fares and parking fees.

The proposal will extend BART’s distance-based fare structure for the Pittsburg Center Station and the Antioch station, resulting in a 15 cent increase at Pittsburg Center and an 80 cent increase at Antioch.

Sample BART to Antioch Fares:

Pittsburg/Bay Point to Embarcadero: $6.70

Pittsburg Center to Embarcadero: $6.85

Antioch to Embarcadero: $7.50

There will be 262 parking spaces on Bliss Avenue near Railroad Avenue serving the Pittsburg Center Station and 1012 parking spaces at the Antioch Station.

The parking fees are proposed to be effective upon commencement of operation of the Pittsburg Center and Antioch stations as follows:

Daily Fee Parking: $3.00 per day

Permit Fee Parking:

Monthly Reserved Permit: $105 per month

Single Day Reserved Permit: $6.00 per day

Airport/Long-Term Permit: $7.00 per day

Your opinion is valued and you can contact me directly at Joel.Keller@bart.gov or 510-915-7925 or you can let the entire Board know your thoughts by emailing BoardOfDirectors@BART.gov or calling 510-464-6095.

District 2 includes Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, Pittsburg and portions of Concord and unincorporated Contra Costa County.

New carpool “Scoop” app pays you $2 for any trip to or from Contra Costa

Wednesday, November 8th, 2017

Between the 12-cent-per-gallon increase in the gas tax and being able to earn $2 credit each trip, there’s never been a better time to trade your solo commute for a shared ride. Whether you fill an empty seat in your car or catch a ride as a passenger, carpooling is a great way to save money.

Thanks to a partnership between 511 Contra Costa and Scoop, when you use the Scoop app to match with another commuter for your ride to work, you get a $2 credit. As long as your trip starts or ends in Contra Costa, each person in the carpool will receive a $2 credit. Passengers will see the credit automatically applied to their trip, while drivers can cash out the credits they earn.

If you commute to Concord, Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre or Dublin/Pleasanton BART using Scoop, you also get guaranteed parking! (Passengers: use the code CCTA05 to get an additional $5 in Scoop credit – the combined $7 in credit covers the cost of most first rides.)

As part of a carpool, you’ll have access to the HOV lanes and can use the I-680 and I-580 Express Lanes toll-free. (Note: If you’re crossing the Bay Bridge, the Scoop app will match you with two other commuters so you can use the HOV lanes.) If you’re driving to Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre BART, Concord BART or Dublin/Pleasanton BART Stations you’re also guaranteed parking if you arrive before 10am and parking is free.

It’s time to give sharing the ride to work a try.

Earning the $2 credit is easy:

1. Download the Scoop app

2. Enter your account information

3. Use the Scoop app to carpool

$5 SCOOP CREDIT: Enter the code CCTA05 in the Scoop app to get a $5 credit towards your first ride.

To download the Scoop app and get a $5 first-time rider credit, visit our Scoop Special Offer page.

During Halloween traffic enforcement Antioch Police K9 helps nab felon on the run with 12″ dagger

Tuesday, November 7th, 2017

12″ dagger and sheath found on felon who ran and was arrested with the assistance of APD K9 unit Donna on 10-31-17.

Driver stopped by APD traffic enforcement officers on Lone Tree Way near Davison 10-31-17.

On Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2017 several Antioch Police officers conducted a proactive traffic enforcement detail in various areas of the city. They focused primarily on violations that are some of the most common causes of traffic collisions we respond to in the City of Antioch.

Officers issued 38 citations for moving violations, 1 parking citation, and handled a non-injury collision that was observed while in the area of Lone Tree Way and Davison Drive.

In addition to the traffic enforcement, officers also made three arrests for various offenses, one of which included an assist from Cpl. Harger and his K-9 partner, “Donna,” for a subject that fled with a felony warrant, and was found to be armed with a concealed 12” dagger.

Antioch Police Captain Aguinaga speaks on successful Antioch partnership, program at national DOJ conference in D.C.

Tuesday, November 7th, 2017

Antioch Police Captain Diane Aguinaga at the DOJ conference.

Successful program in Antioch reduces failures to appear in court

Captain Diane Aguinaga recently had the honor of speaking at the Right 2 Counsel conference held by the Department of Justice in Washington D.C. She highlighted the unique partnership between the Antioch Police Department, Contra Costa County Office of the Public Defender and the county Office of Reentry and Justice.

APD entered into this program in July 2016 with the goal of reducing failures to appear (FTA’s) in court. Since then, the FTA percentage has dropped from 57% to 27% in Antioch on low level misdemeanors. The program’s success has been expanded to West Contra Costa County, and is soon to be expanded to Central County.

Oakley man arrested in Antioch for drugs, stolen checks, stolen loaded gun discovered during Friday traffic stop

Tuesday, November 7th, 2017

Stolen gun, bullets, drugs and body armor found on the suspect and in his car by Antioch Police 11-3-17.

On Friday, November 3, 2017, Antioch Police officers made a traffic stop on Texas St. for vehicle code violations. They contacted the driver, a 25-year-old Oakley resident, and a subsequent search of the occupant and his vehicle revealed methamphetamine, cocaine base, drug paraphernalia, stolen checks, a fully loaded 10mm pistol that had been reported as stolen, and body armor. The subject was arrested and sent to County Jail.

 

Guest Commentary: Dawn of a new day for the Antioch animal shelter

Tuesday, November 7th, 2017

Editor:

Antioch animals deserved better and now we at Antioch Animals Deserve Better are delighted to say things really are getting better at Antioch Animal Services!  It is the product of determination, tough decisions, and a lot of hard work.  And while there is more to do, progress at the shelter is significant, real, and continues in the right direction!

We would like to extend our enormous appreciation to Tony LaRussa’s Animal Rescue Foundation (ARF) for their expert guidance and willingness to step in to help Antioch, as well as coordinating with Maddie’s Fund for much needed funds to help the Shelter (thanks to you too, Maddie’s).

We would also like to express our gratitude to the Antioch City Council and the Mayor for their support of the Shelter and partnership with ARF.  And let us not forget the Shelter staff, volunteers, and rescue groups who stepped up to embrace change and are helping the animals through it all.

We want to especially thank and acknowledge Antioch’s new Police Chief Tammany Brooks for taking a real interest in the Shelter, educating himself about Animal Sheltering, and taking a no nonsense, open, and honest approach. The community sees your true leadership in many areas and it is making a difference.

And lastly, we want to thank all of you who supported the cause for the animals and positive change at the shelter.  Please see the recent GoFundMe update below from the incredible attorney whose generous pro bono work helped us. We have donated 100% of the funds to ARF towards their work at the Antioch Shelter.

Many positive changes are taking hold and good things are happening.

Kim Charef

Antioch

Antioch Animals Deserve Better

** GO FUND ME UPDATE **

Posted on Antioch Animals Deserve Better Facebook page 10-17-17 by Nancy Powell, Esq.

OVERALL SUCCESS – FUNDS TO ARF

ARF was brought in by the City of Antioch last fall and they have worked, guided and contributed mightily toward improving the Antioch Animal Shelter. It was through the pressure put on the Antioch City Council and the Council’s knowledge that folks like you demanded change that ARF got involved, so you can take credit with ARF for making things happen.

The Shelter is now working under different key individuals, is working to get a vet tech and a veterinarian to work there, has revised how often and when veterinary care is sought for the animals, has improved procedures and at the very basic level is a cleaner, nicer place to be stuck if you are an animal. ARF is continuing to work and guide the Shelter on issues that still need attention.

We demanded changes and the City got ARF involved. We were poised to go back into litigation mode if we did not see progress.

We believe that the funds that were donated to the GoFundMe campaign are no longer needed for litigation and should go to ARF to be used to further their great efforts in improving the Shelter. Therefore, the full amount collected in the GoFundMe campaign of $1,745 is being sent to ARF for this purpose. As long as the City continues to follow the guidance provided by ARF, things can only get better. If anything changes, we will update you.

Thank you for your support. It made a huge difference for the animals and the community.

Nancy V. Powell, Esq.

Antioch Council meeting on marijuana business ban gets contentious, accusations fly

Monday, November 6th, 2017

Councilmembers not happy with lack of action and information by city staff, commission

By Robbie Pierce

What turned out to be a necessary unanimous vote by the four members present at their special meeting on Wednesday, Nov. 1, the Antioch City Council discussion of a second extension of the ban on commercial recreational marijuana operations turned contentious. During the emergency meeting, called for by Mayor Sean Wright, it was both Councilmember Tony Tiscareno and Mayor Pro Tem Lamar Thorpe who expressed their angst and frustration with city staff and the city’s Economic Development Commission for not having a final ordinance to vote on.

With Councilwoman Lori Ogorchock absent, Wright, Thorpe and Councilmembers Tiscareno and Monica Wilson debated whether or not to extend for a second time the temporary moratorium, or prohibition, on non-medical commercial marijuana cultivation, manufacture, sales and deliveries in the city. It was adopted Nov. 8, 2016 and extended for the first time Dec 13, 2016 in the wake of the passage of state Proposition 64. That measure legalized such usage and commercial operations, and set up the framework for the State of California to begin issuing licenses to sell marijuana Jan 1, 2018. It also gives cities and counties the power to regulate the commercial operations.

Also present at the meeting were Acting City Manager Nickie Mastay, as City Manager Ron Bernal was out of town.

The meeting was the council’s last opportunity to extend the moratorium, as a third extension would not be allowed, and it required a super majority of four of five council members. With Ogorchock absent, the council members present needed to vote unanimously in order to pass an extension of any kind – an additional year was what was proposed as the Recommended Action by staff.

The moratorium was originally enacted so that city staff could have one year to gather data and statistics on how non-medical marijuana legalization would affect the city of Antioch, and what laws and regulations the city legislature should enact. Interim City Attorney Elizabeth Perez, of the Cota Cole & Huber LLP law firm, explained that the additional extension was now being proposed “so that we may complete our analysis of the financial impacts and negative impacts that regulating non-medical marijuana use within city limits would create.”

The public hearing attracted three speakers with Jeffrey Klinger and city Economic Development Commissioner Tim McCall both speaking in favor of it. Each asserted similar points that the moratorium gives the council time to properly evaluate the situation and the proper response.

“This will give the council, staff, police department… the time necessary to research and make correct decisions for the city of Antioch on its residents,” McCall stated.

The council had two items on the matter to consider. “Item #1) Accept and approve the report from the City Attorney and provide direction regarding a permanent ordinance regulating non-medical marijuana uses and; Item #2) Adopt the second extension of the interim urgency ordinance establishing a temporary moratorium on non-medical marijuana uses.”

Tiscareno, Thorpe Challenge Staff Report

Following public comment, Tiscareno requested separate discussion on agenda items 1 and 2, noting that he had “some discussion” on the former but “not much problem” with the latter.

He expressed some issues with the staff report given to the council, claiming it was “one-sided” and “doesn’t tell the trueness” of what voters were “trying to accomplish” when they passed Prop 64. According to several council members, 73% of Antioch residents voted in favor of it last November. Tiscareno wished that it had been “more open-minded” so that the council could have the proper information to make “conscious decisions on what reflects our voters and also protect our city,” and ultimately stated that he was “not in favor of the staff report as written at this point.”

Thorpe chimed in that he “[didn’t] disagree one bit with… Councilman Tiscareno” on the notion of the report being biased, and also lamented that the staff had been given a year already and was now asking for another year despite having given them no new information. He complained that the report attached to the meeting agenda was a year old.

“What concerns me… is that we gave staff a year last time,” he said. “I haven’t heard any of what we asked of staff.”

Thorpe referred to previous, unfulfilled requests they gave to staff, such as that they co-operate with the Economic Development Commission (EDC) and hold community outreach workshops to gauge public opinion. He and Wright claimed those requests occurred at council meetings in January and March. However, it was at their May 9 meeting that the council discussed having an an ad hoc committee of the council and commission discuss and hear from the public on the matter. According to EDC Chair Keith Archuleta, that ad hoc committee was never formed.

“We weren’t elected… to figure out whether voters were right or wrong, we were elected to implement the policy that voters wanted to implement,” he explained, outlining his hesitancy over more or less blocking a state-wide initiative for another year due to a lack of data on it.

Wilson echoed the sentiments of Tiscareno and Thorpe, calling the staff’s work up to date “disappointing.”

Ultimately, the council, seeing approval of the report as more “symbolic” than anything else in the words of Mayor Wright, voted 4-0 to “receive” the report, not approve it, with the direction that staff “come back with a report that more reflects both sides of the story.”

Commission Didn’t Get the Matter Until June

Following the Nov. 1 council meeting, EDC Chair Archuleta said that the commission didn’t get the moratorium matter “until June, officially and had the chance to deliberate on it.”

“The EDC meets every other month but didn’t have a meeting in August. So, the next meeting was held in October,” he explained. “At that meeting, we recommended to the council they extend the moratorium.”

“At our next meeting in December we will discuss options,” Archuleta continued. “We are considering outcomes from Colorado and other cities in California…of what the cost benefits are.”

“The public can make comments at our December meeting. We didn’t have any members of the public who commented at our first two meetings,” he said. “The public is welcome at any of our meetings.”

“We are hoping by February we will have a set of recommendations we can put forward to the council,” Archuleta added.

Discussion Becomes Contentious

As for Item 2, the council was firmly unified on the idea that they wanted to leave having passed something, but became hotly and contentiously divided on just how long they ought to extend the moratorium. Thorpe wanted a mere six-month extension to “put more meat” on their decision and pressure the staff to act fast, with Tiscareno and Wilson slowly rallying to his position. Wright continued to push for a full, one-year extension to ensure that they had all the required time, having confirmed that they could cancel the moratorium at any time with a majority vote.

At the urging of McCall from the audience, public comment was re-opened for the notion of a six-month extension, with another speaker named Julia speaking in opposition of extending the moratorium at all. Klinger and McCall both speak in favor of a full year extension.

After much debate, discussions with both Mastay and EDC Member McCall to determine how much time they needed, and two failed motions, the council eventually compromised and passed 4-0 a measure to extend the moratorium for nine months, with direction to staff to give them a new report on the status of their research every two months.

“I’m voting no,” Thorpe joked before voting in favor of the third and final motion, ensuring a successful, required four favorable votes for passage.

The meeting ended with the mayor and him shaking hands and laughing.

An attempt to reach Ogorchock for the reason she was absent was unsuccessful before publication time. Please check back later to read her response. Please also see related article with background on the ordinance from the Nov. 1 council meeting, here.

Allen Payton contributed to this report.

 

Antioch Planning Commission recommends Rocketship elementary charter school project for Council approval

Saturday, November 4th, 2017

Rendering of proposed Rocketship charter school planned for Antioch.

First net zero energy charter school in America; 5-0 vote moves project on to the City Council for final decision

By Allen Payton

During the meeting of the Antioch Planning Commission on Wed., Nov. 1, about 100 supporters of the Rocketship charter school – most of whom were Hispanic – rejoiced when Commissioners voted 5-0 to approve plans for their new facility in town. One commission seat is vacant due to the recent resignation of Sedar Husary, and Vice Chair Martha Parsons was at home ill and unable to attend. (See the commission agenda and Rocketship’s plans, here).

Approved by the Antioch School Board on a 3-2 vote last fall, the school is planned to be built on the 1.7 acre site of the former headquarters of the East County Times at 1700 Cavallo Road. The organization purchased the building, and plans to tear it down and construct a new, 31,052-square-foot, two-story facility for the 600 students in grades from Transitional Kindergarten through fifth.

Site plan for the Rocketship Antioch charter school location showing the former East County Times building and parking lot.

Public Safety Concerns

Concerns were expressed by city staff including Chief of Police Tammany Brooks about the proximity to one of the worst crime areas in Antioch, just across E. 18th Street. But, Rocketship representatives argued that they specifically target neighborhoods such as that, including their location in San Jose, and that a $14 million investment of a new school, with students, faculty, staff and parents – “more eyes”, as on representative said – can help reduce crime in that part of town. One suggestion by Brooks was that the school have an armed guard on campus was shot down by Antioch School Board President Walter Ruehlig who cast the deciding vote on the board in favor of the privately-owned charter school. He was incredulous at the idea, stating, “none of the Antioch schools have an armed guard. Lord, oh Lord. What kind of message will that send? ‘Antioch places an armed guard in an elementary school.’”

In response to concerns by the Antioch Police Department, security plans have been developed for the school. Rocketship would just prefer a guard that isn’t armed.

Parking Spaces Issue

Another and major issue was the amount of parking spaces on the site. The plan is for 40 onsite spaces, but city staff recommended a minimum of 60 spaces based on a calculation of .10 spaces per student. The average in the area is .12 spaces per child and staff which would require 73 spaces. Rocketship explained that they have on average .05 spaces per student and staff at their other schools which would net 31 spaces, so what they’re offering is more than that.

However, city staff said were concerned with the monthly community meetings and twice monthly Saturday workshops the school plans to hold.  Plus, there was “not enough (spaces) for parent volunteers and off-site parking agreements are not in place.” As such, city staff recommended the school limit their capacity to 400 students for one year.

With that and the other recommendations city staff recommended the commission approve the school’s plans.

Commissioners and city staff prepare to start the hearing on Rocketship.

Commissioners Questions & Comments

Commissioner Kerry Motts was first to comment, stating “they’ve offered some efforts to meet half-way.” Then Commissioner Bob Martin had a discussion with staff about the parking spaces and left turns from Cavallo Road into the school, as well as off-site parking.

City Traffic Engineer Lynn Filson responded, “right now there are no restrictions” on drivers making left turns from the turn lane into the school. “But if we find it’s a problem we could make it illegal.”

“With this project we are asking them to restripe the street…so they can have parking in front of their building and in front of the (adjacent) county building,” Filson added.

Martin also was concerned about barriers and fencing not being tall enough.

“Dous the police department believe that’s enough for safety?” he asked “I somewhat worry can they jump the fence if it’s only six-foot.”

Commissioner Jim Conley asked if it is “required we have a bike lane on both sides” of the street.

Filson responded that “there’s enough room to have a bike lane and parking on both sides” and that the city needs to “leave the bike lanes in place so kids can ride their bikes to school. The bike lanes are for everyone.”

Commissioner Kenny Turnage said “if anyone drops their children off at school it is almost like a game of Frogger with all the kids running around there.”

But he doubted that many children would ride their bikes to school, which he said, “I haven’t seen in the past five years.”

“It seems like a recipe for disaster,” Turnage added.

Filson responded, saying “I think it would be easier to eliminate the left turn lane.”

About 100 people turned out for the Planning Commission hearing for the Rocketship school project.

Rocketship Presents Project

Representatives of Rocketship, including Regional Director Marie Gill and Harrison Tucker, the director of the their real estate team, provided an overview of the project.

“I represent the 100’s of Rocketship families and other partners who are supporting the effort,” Gill stated.

She shared that the new Antioch school will be the “first net zero energy charter school campus in the U.S. We are not cutting corners.”

“Safety is foundational,” Gill continued. “We have offered to place a security guard at the corner of Cavallo and East 18th Street during the first two years. More eyes on the street will result in less crime. We propose an unarmed guard.”

“Even in our most violent neighborhoods, we haven’t needed an armed guard,” she added.

Gill addressed the parking issue stating, “49 parking spaces for 34 staff…providing a BART shuttle for employees and a ride-share subsidy for those who live within two miles” of the school.

Their plans “necessitate a 600-student enrollment,” Gill shared.

Regarding the plans she stated, “this school will be an architectural enhancement” to the neighborhood, and asked that the commission “remove conditions of a façade change,” sought by city staff. She also mentioned the “solar array” and the “white arches harkening back to the early days of California” as additional, positive features of the facility.

Gill spoke of “innovative visioning” and concluded saying, “great schools unleash economic development. Together we will give our children that opportunity and they will lead us into tomorrow.”

Questions By Commissioners

Martin asked the Rocketship representatives about how many staff they expected to have living outside of East County. “We’re estimating five at this point,” Gill responded.

In response to a question by Conley of “what led you to choose this site,” Gill said, “we are here to serve low-income communities. The site meets all of our needs. We have a 1,000-foot queue on Cavallo. We did do a study on Antioch. We wanted to be within walking distance” of that kind of neighborhood.

Natalie, a second-grader at Rocketship’s Concord campus spoke with assistance by her mother.

Public Comments All Favorable

Then the commissioners heard from the public. Parents of Rocketship students, their children, and other supporters, including other community leaders all spoke in favor of the project, asking commissioners for approval so that efforts can move forward in time for a fall 2018 opening. They wore purple shirts with phrases like “Antioch community in pursuit of excellence in public education” and “Rocketship Education is

Angel Luevano who helps run an after-school math program in Antioch, was first to speak, saying “it’s just about our children and their education. Expedite this process without stifling encumbrances.”

Regular council meeting attendee, Nancy Fernandez was next saying, “I’m a 50-year resident of Antioch. I support charter schools. My grandchildren were educated in charter schools. It’s just what our community needs to jump start the Cavallo area.”

Her husband Marty Fernandez said, “I’ve seen companies driven out of coming to Antioch,” then spoke of Rocketship’s “$15 million investment.”

“Do you see anyone else investing in Antioch?” he asked. “Do something better for Antioch than a Taco Bell.”

Tom McNell said he is a “26-year resident” and that “the parking drop-off is 1,000 feet,” and that De La Salle which has 1,050 students and 800 girls at Carondolet across the street on Winton Drive in Walnut Creek, with a 430-foot right-of-way.

“Every year we have to train the freshman parents,” he said to laughter from the audience. McNell is the parking coordinator for De La Salle.

“I do not understand…it should be how do we make things work in this town not how do we deny them,” he stated. “De La Salle has 10 overflow parking spaces.”

Speaking of Rocketship in comparison to the private high school with the championship football team, McNell stated “it (Rocketship) doesn’t have 5,000 (people) coming to a football game.”

“Plus, 1,500 kids at YV (Ygnacio Valley High School,” (which has a walkway and driveway near De La Salle and Carondolet) he continued. “I’ve seen two accidents in 15 years.”

Regarding the city staff’s issues with the design of the new Rocketship school, McNell added, “the building they’re going to tear down is uglier than sin,” also to laughter from the audience.

Hans Ho, a member of the Antioch Police Crime Prevention Commission spoke as a private citizen, not in his official capacity, said he was “here to talk about the impact on crime in the Cavallo area.”

“Blight breeds crime and crime breeds more blight,” he stated. “We will have taken a giant step in reducing blight in that area. In my experience criminals do not like having their business watched by ordinary citizens.”

“In the beginning you might see an increase in the calls for service as more crimes are reported,” Ho continued. “They’re already there.”

He added that the school will help the neighborhood experience “a reduction in crime and an increase in property values.”

Rendering of an aerial view of the proposed Rocketship school building and site in Antioch.

Scientist and local business owner Dr. Terry Ramus, who is also chairman of the Government Affairs/Economic Development Committee of the Antioch Chamber of Commerce said, “this part of town needs the $14 million investment. Antioch needs a win. I’m hoping we can hit a grand slam on this for the City of Antioch,” referring to the final game of the World Series occurring at the same time as the meeting.

“The Antioch Chamber of Commerce has endorsed the Rocketship plan,” he continued. “It will allow socioeconomically disadvantaged children to have a better education. It will allow their parents to have choice, too.”

“We need to move through the process, quickly,” Ramus added. “The school works like a finely tuned machine.”

Antioch resident Jessica Duran whose five-year-old daughter attends the Rocketship school, Futuro Academy in Concord said, “Why?” does she drive her daughter to school there?

“Because I want the best education for my daughter,” she said. “We deserve the same in Antioch.”

Next to speak with the assistance of her mother was Natalie, a second-grader who also attends the Concord Rocketship campus.

“I like reading. Math is my favorite. I like the learning lab,” she stated. “Approve the Rocketship school so my mom doesn’t have to drive so far to take me to school every day.”

Andrea LeBron, an Antioch resident and parent of a Rocketship student at their Concord school said, “the big deal is about the parking lot. We need to figure it out as a community. What we need is this school on behalf of all the parents driving miles and miles go get our children to school in Concord.”

“At Antioch High I wasn’t told ‘Andrea, you need to go to college,’” she shared. “But at Rocketship they tell the students they need to go to college.”

“Everybody, we know all the crimes in that area,” LeBron continued. “A person who owns a store there told me ‘the school will be a good thing.’ I hope you guys approve it.”

Then Ruehlig spoke, not in his official capacity, but also “as a private citizen who has a passion for equal education opportunity.”

“First, let me congratulate the parents here for taking their job so seriously,” he stated. “It is so needed in this day and age, as parents are our first and our greatest teachers.”

He shared about his own experience as a child in attending high-performing schools outside of New York City and was the reason his father was willing to commute an hour-and-a-half to work in the city.

“We have a terrific school on its way, a public charter school,” Ruehlig continued from prepared remarks. “Whether white, black or brown, good education will always be the ultimate equalizer. There’s no arguing that there are many seats at the table…traditional public schools, private schools, magnet schools, alternative schools, digital academies, home study and public, yes i emphasize public charter schools, for that is what charters are, take away misconceptions and false propaganda.”

“As such, don’t let anyone tell you that one size fits all and deny your child the right fit for their needs and the seat at the table that they deserve,” he added. “I leave you with my fond hope that the long-cherished American dream of equal opportunity and equitable education be embraced here in Antioch. And my prayer for you is that your child’s name stars in that dream.”

BART Director Debra Allen, who represents Central County on the BART Board, spoke as an Antioch property owner and East County business owner, said she was there on behalf of the “25 hard working men and women who work at East County Glass who work for me. Their children deserve a better education.”

“I’m a San Francisco BART Director and I pledge to you I will do whatever I can to make the shuttles work,” she continued. “BART has a tremendous system to get people to and from their schools and jobs.”

“Parents only get one shot at raising their kids. There are no do overs,” Allen added. “Antioch needs options. Work with this organization and work out the details.”

Commissioners Ask More Questions Then Decide

Martin seeking answers to his concerns about the safety, asked Chief Brooks about the “six-foot fencing in front of the school. Part of it has cement as a bottom” wanting to know if that would make it easier for someone to scale over.

In a light-hearted moment, Brooks was greeted with applause from the audience as he approached the podium to speak, and jokingly said “As long as I get applauded like that I’ll keep coming to meetings.”

“You haven’t even said anything, yet,” someone said. “I know,” Brooks responded with a chuckle.

He responded to Commissioner Martin’s concern stating, “People could scale a six-foot fence.”

Asked about the issue of armed guards, Brooks responded, “I would welcome any security measure. An armed guard was a suggestion.”

To Motts question if “increased activity will decrease illegal activity,” Brooks said, “I don’t know for sure. I’ve read that can happen. But, don’t know until the school is there.”

Turnage asked if the cameras at the Cavallo and E. 18th Street intersection, can “pick up activity at the school.” Brooks explained that there are two sets of cameras, license plat readers and surveillance, which are “pan-tilt, zoom cameras that could tilt toward the school. It gets changes manually.”

Then back to the parking matter, Filson said “I have no issue with parking on Cavallo. It’s a code issue. We could pick up seven to eight spaces and about the same in front of the county building.”

She then suggested “staggered, ramp-up enrollment to 600 students in the third year. Then decrease the number of students if the parking studies don’t pan out.”

“It seems difficult to scale back” enrollment, one commissioner responded.

A rendering of the view of the proposed Rocketship school on Cavallo Road from a northeast view.

Antioch Community Development Director Forrest Ebbs said that was a “great question for a use permit hearing. I really want you to feel totally empowered to make that kind of decision,” he explained to the commissioners.

Motts then asked about the staff’s concerns with the design of the building.

City Planning Manager Alexis Morris responded, saying they were following “citywide design guidelines approved by council. Our typical requirement is to comply with the guidelines,” which are “not standards or rules.”

Turnage then asked “what’s wrong” with the design. “I grew up in this neighbhorhood.”

Ebbs responded, saying “architecture is like art. Guidelines are for discussion.”

Turnage then said, “so it’s like a Picasso. Either you like it or you see someone draw a messed up face.”

Back to the parking issue, Martin then asked, “why was the back southwest corner viewed as alternative parking?”

Morris replied, “the applicant described it as overflow parking. It’s playground space.”

Commission Chair Janet Zacharatos shared her thoughts.

“Before tonight I wasn’t familiar with Rocketship,” she stated. “I definitely think it’s an excellent project and I would like to see it go forward. It needs to work out a few details.”

Conley then went through the list of difference in conditions between the city staff’s recommendations and what the commissioners wanted.

“No armed security guards,” he stated. “Parking. There isn’t adequate parking at any school in Antioch. To regulate this school to have more stringent traffic…isn’t fair. I wouldn’t want to hurt this school economically. To cut student population from 600 to 400 would be devastating.”

Zacharatos then said the “only other item is the rezone, which sounds like a no-brainer.”

Conley then attempted to make a motion, stating “I move approval with the requirements of no armed guard, existing parking and traffic be accepted.”

But, then staff asked him about the design elements, to which he replied, “I don’t care what the county building looks at” to laughter and applause from the audience.

“So, you’re OK striking that,” asked Morris.

“Yes,” Conley replied.

Ebbs then asked to confirm what the commissioners where attempting to do, “you’ve agreed to everything in Rocketship’s recommendations” and not all of the 30 conditions in the staff report.

Turnage responded, saying, “no restrictions on the number of students and I second that.”

Then by roll call vote, the commissioners passed the motion recommending to the City Council that they approve Rocketship’s plans, and did so unanimously by those who were in attendance, garnering one more vote than the minimum four needed for approval.

The audience applauded, and some yelled out “Thank you.”

The City Council is expected to hear the matter for final decision at their November 14 meeting.