46-year-old Edgielyn Torrente located Sunday morning about one mile west of where she went missing on September 23rd; family notified

By Lt. Michael Mellone, Antioch Police Field Services Bureau

ANTIOCH, Calif. – Edgielyn “Lynn” Torrente, 46, who went missing while swimming near Smith’s Landing Seafood Grill in Antioch on September 23, 2026, was found deceased in the San Joaquin River on Sunday, September 27, 2026.

Her family has been notified, and this update was held until that notification was complete.

The Antioch Police Department extends its sincere condolences to her family and friends.

RECOVERY

At about 7:06 a.m. on September 27, 2026, officers responded to multiple calls reporting a person in the water west of Smith’s Landing. She was located about one mile farther west. The Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office Marine Patrol and the Pittsburg Police Department recovered her from the water. The Sheriff’s Office Coroner’s Division responded and took custody.

The Coroner’s Division will determine the cause and manner of death. No foul play is suspected.

BACKGROUND

As previously reported, on Wednesday, September 23, 2026, at 6:12 p.m., officers responded to reports of two women in distress in the water behind Smith’s Landing Seafood Grill. The women had been swimming when a strong current pulled them from shore. Officer Molina reached one of the women, Farrah Moore, on a personal watercraft and brought her to safety.

According to his mother, Judy Dossey, “The private citizen on scene who was operating the jet ski is Jeff Lewis, an Antioch resident. Mr. Lewis also assisted in the rescue of the swimmer in distress.”

The U.S. Coast Guard, the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, and the Sheriff’s Office Air Support Unit joined APD in water and aerial searches for Torrente.

Lt. Cesar Franco said it was his understanding the two women were homeless. According to a post on the Homelessness in Antioch & Community Connection Facebook page, local homeless advocate, Nichole Gardner, wrote on the day she was rescued, “Farrah is out of the hospital and is back downtown.” She also shared that Torrente went by “Lynn”.

The Antioch Police Department thanks each of these agencies, the Pittsburg Police Department, and the community members who called 911. CASE NO. 26-9135

Allen D. Payton contributed to this report.

Featuring Crosstown 5

By Lions Clubs International

Experience an afternoon of great music for a great cause at Antioch’s great El Campanil Theatre, Saturday, Oct. 3, 2026! This special benefit concert supports the Lions Center for the Visually Impaired and the Lions Vision Resource Network, which provide vital services and resources to blind and visually impaired residents of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties.

Enjoy the dynamic performance of the Crosstown 5, featuring lead singer Delia Colorado. Guests can also participate in raffles and purchase light refreshments before the show and during intermission. Join us in supporting independence, opportunity, and hope for individuals with vision loss.

For tickets at $50 per person visit Visions in Harmony Featuring Crosstown 5 – El Campanil Theatre.

The theatre is located at 602 W 2nd Street in historic, downtown Rivertown.

For ages 4-15

At the U.E. “Compy” Compomizzo Fishing Pier in Rivertown

“Get kids hooked on fishing, not drugs or gangs.” – Compy Compomizzo

By City of Antioch Recreation Department

Sign up to be part of the 38th Annual free Kids Fishing Derby taking place Saturday, October 10, 2026. The event is held in the memory of Antioch resident “Compy” Compomizzo, for whom the fishing pier is named, and who inspired the mission statement: “Get kids hooked on fishing, not drugs or gangs.” The fishing derby provides the opportunity to teach kids fifteen and younger conservation and the basics of fishing competition that may spur an interest in future events. Register the day of the event to join in on this exciting afternoon filled with great catches!

Open to kids ages 4 – 15 with a parent or adult guardian, the Fishing Derby will take place in Waldie Plaza, across from City Hall, and on the U.E. “Compy” Compomizzo Fishing Pier in Antioch’s historic, downtown Rivertown.

Note: If you have your own fishing poles, please bring them. For those who do not have fishing equipment, there will be poles for you to borrow.

This event is made possible through the great partnership between the California Striped Bass Association, West Delta Chapter and the City of Antioch Recreation Department.

About California Striped Bass Association – West Delta Chapter

Founded in 1974 in Stockton, California, the California Striped Bass Association carries the purpose of promoting the “preservation and enhancement of Striped Bass”, a movement inspired after Delta fishermen became aware of the declining striped bass numbers and negative changes to the Delta ecology following the State Water Project in the 1940s. Learn more about the West Delta Chapter and become a Member of the California Striped Bass Association-West Delta Chapter. 

For more information about the derby call Brian Smith at (925) 325-9836 or visit www.antiochca.gov/216/Kids-Fishing-Derby.

Allen D. Payton contributed to this report.

This month, the Downtown Antioch Association meets somewhere special — the old lumber yard building on W. 2nd Street, now home to Prime Vintage Realty. A piece of Antioch history, still standing strong and serving our community today.

Home-based businesses, storefronts, big or small — if you’re a local business owner in Antioch, we want you at the table. Join us for our monthly DAA meeting: mixer at 5:30 PM, meeting 6:00–7:30 PM.

Tuesday, September 29 — Prime Vintage Realty, 340 W. 2nd Street, Rivertown, Antioch

Not a member or sponsor yet? Join the Downtown Antioch Association family at antiochdaa.com.

Wants it to include broader option of other parts of city

By Allen D. Payton

Following meetings held with downtown business owners and community members regarding hours of operation, patrol locations, scope of services and other identified needs and issues, during their meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, the Antioch City Council discussed restoring private security services to the City-owned parking lots in downtown Rivertown. But the discussion expanded to other issues and possible broader private security services throughout the city.

First approved by the Council in 2023, according to the city staff report, the contract with Brentwood-based Shield Protection & Public Safety, Inc., DBA Spearhead Protection, for private security services of City-owned assets and parking lots in the Rivertown area was for an amount not to exceed $50,000 in fiscal year 2023-24 (ending June 30th) and $100,000 in fiscal year 2024-25. It was renewed for the 2025-26 fiscal year and the private security contract ended on June 30th.

Under Item 6, on the agenda, the Council was asked to discuss downtown security services for City owned parking lots, property and public areas, and provide direction to staff on whether to initiate a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process for private security services in the Rivertown/Downtown area.

Mayor Pro Tem and District 3 Councilman Don Freitas was the first council member to speak saying, “Frankly, this issue came to us from the Downtown Antioch Association. Because…there have been more and more reports since the security has stopped. We began asking a lot of questions…and all of us received input from the DAA and Chamber of Commerce.”

“They complimented the police department and some of the crime prevention efforts,” he continued. “But crime has risen since the services have stopped.”

“Clearly the hours from their perspective, about 30 people were in attendance and 60% said they wanted different hours,” Freitas said. “There are a lot of issues that came out of this. Conceptually, yes, I believe services should be provided. But I don’t know what should be provided. There are a lot of options: Hours of operation. There are businesses that were under contract but did not perform.”

Acting City Manager Ana Cortez responded saying, “What I’m seeking tonight is direction. Does Council want to continue with private security services? If yes, we’d have to proceed with a request for proposal process, since the previous contract ended. We would put all the input into a scope of services.”

“Private security services represent one aspect,” Freitas continued. “The lighting in the downtown, the homelessness issue, the cleanliness. All of that was discussed extensively by the business owners and private residents. This should be comprehensive and not just in the downtown.”

“But, we said, there needs to be a public-private partnership,” he stated. “This cannot be just the City of Antioch. This cannot be just the General Fund. This needs to be a collaborative effort.”

“What’s really confusing about the process is that…it explicitly says security services will be used for City-owned properties and parking lots…it will not be to patrol privately-owned property,” District 1 Councilwoman Tamisha Torres-Walker stated, asking “Is their focus, City-owned property downtown? If I see somebody breaking into a business, do I ignore it?”

“I think they would report that to the police department,” Cortez responded. “That’s something that would be included in the scope of work.”

“I expected to see a fully drafted Request for Proposal…and that’s not here,” Torres-Walker continued. “In addition to a public-private partnership.”

She then spoke of an overlay district and said, “I know that’s a longer-term strategy.”

“This does involve a bigger discussion,” she continued. “I know the mayor pro tem and I are appointed to the Downtown Standing Committee. What I would request…is that we as a City, we might want to reassess the potential of that standing committee and establish an ad-hoc committee. Is the standing committee still necessary? What would a task force look like? It’s kind of hard to have dialogue and workshop in a standing committee.”

District 4 Councilwoman Monica Wilson then said, “Although there is a list of what the private security will do…then there’s also the expectations of our businesses which don’t align. A lot of this seems to be more of a police department issue.

“This is about public property, not a private business,” she continued. “How are we going to make this work with the expectations of

“It’s a Code Enforcement issue, it’s a Public Works issue…we got into a parking issue and turns out, some of the worst offenders are the business owners,” Freitas stated. “Frankly, one of the parties is the railroad. That is a big issue in the downtown and we seem to ignore it until we handle it until the next time. I think we need to have a broader discussion.”

“I don’t want to dismiss the issue of needing security in downtown, right now,” Torres-Walker added. “It needs to include a larger community voice.”

“I can come back to the next council meeting with an RFP,” Cortez responded.

“One of the other issues that isn’t addressed, necessarily in the current parking lots, at the water treatment plant, we’ve had calls for service…if there are other areas of the city that are having issues,” Mayor Ron Bernal stated.

“This is about one security guard. Is one enough?” he asked. “Not just in downtown.”

“I think we also need to look at the Downtown Specific Plan…I think that would be important,” Bernal added.

“We do want to include the entire city, not just the downtown,” Cortez stated.

“In talking to the chief, I included other parts of town…it should be expanded,” said Bernal.

“We need to hear from Public Works, Code Enforcement…if the hours are correct. I think the way we had it did not work,” said Freitas.

“Moving those around is the best model,” Bernal interjected.

“I thought it was very good for all council members and staff, the chief to hear these dialogues…having that dialogue was very, very helpful,” Freitas stated. “Some things came up that we never hear. I think an ad hoc is better than a steering (he meant standing) committee which has other rules.”

Torres-Walker then asked what about businesses in other parts of Antioch.

“Are security officers armed, are they not armed, do they have lights on their patrol cars?” Bernal asked.

“And what businesses are already paying for private security?” Torres-Walker asked. “They might be in a commercial lot with other private businesses. She then reiterated her proposal for a public-private partnership.

“It started as a focus on the downtown,” Cortez explained. “It turned out to be a bigger issue.”

Cortez will return with a proposed RFP or RFQ for discussion at the Council meeting on Oct. 13th.

Plus, discuss downtown security services, vote on emergency fuel purchase, more traffic calming devices, increasing investigative services contract, more water park repairs & improvements, and report on state and federal funds for housing and homeless

Still nothing on agenda about El Campanil Theatre although escrow closes Sept. 29th

By Allen D. Payton

During their regular meeting Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, the Antioch City Council has a full agenda and will vote on reestablishing the Economic Development Department, with one staff member and either a director or combined assistant city manager dual role,emergency fuel purchase, increasing investigative services contract for the Police Department by $250,000,almost $200,000 for more traffic calming devices and $141,000 for more improvements to the water park. They will also discuss restoring private security services in downtown Rivertown and the annual report on use of state and federal funds for housing and homeless services. Finally, the Council will vote on approving a Tentative Agreement with the Confidential Unit of City employees for a one-year 3% COLA increase.

That will follow a Closed Session at 6:00 p.m. during which the Council will meet to discuss the contracts with representatives of three employee organizations: Antioch Public Employees’ Association, Treatment Plant Employees’ Association and Antioch Police Sworn Management Association.

Reestablishing Economic Development Department, Director, Staff or Dual Assistant City Manager Role, Possible Commission

Under Item 7 the Council will vote on reestablishing a standalone Economic Development Department separate from Community Development, with funding for an Economic Development Director position with an amended salary range, an Economic Development Specialist, and assigning a budget; or directing staff to revise the existing Assistant City Manager job description whose primary role would be to focus on economic development in an 80/20 scope of work structure.

As previously reported and according to the City staff report, “Per the City Council’s direction from the August 31, 2026, Study Session, below are the options for discussion.

• A standalone Economic Development Department;

• An Economic Development Director responsible for oversight and implementation of the Economic Development Strategic Plan or amending the Assistant City Manager to an 80/20 dual role;

• Status of Economic Development Commission (EDC); and

• Providing a substantial budget to the Economic Development Department for programming and successful operations.

“Under the proposed 80/20 structure, the City Manager Department would gain dedicated Assistant City Manager capacity for executive initiatives, Council priorities, interdepartmental coordination, and organizational problem-solving, while retaining responsibility for matters that cannot be delegated. This creates a tradeoff between dedicated departmental oversight and unrestricted Assistant City Manager capacity.”

In addition, Mayor Ron Bernal suggested a salary range “something similar to the current Community and Economic Development Director of  $14,800 to $18,000.”

Also, as previously reported, the two departments were combined last year and has had an acting director since March 3rd, after a the new director was hired in October but left effective that day. The Economic Development Department hasn’t had a separate director since Kwame Reed was promoted to Assistant City Manager on Jan. 23, 2025. He, too, has since left the City for a job with the County.

While the Commission was never officially dissolved, during their meeting on April 9, 2024, the City Council voted unanimously to dissolve their own Restructuring of the Economic Development Commission Ad Hoc Committee. According to the meeting minutes, District 1 “Councilmember Tamisha Torres-Walker explained that the committee’s purpose was to restructure the EDC to improve functionality,” but “expressed her support for dissolving the existing Ad Hoc Committee.”

During that council meeting, then-District 3 Councilwoman Lori Ogorchock asked that the vacancies on the Commission be filled to no avail.

According to Tim McCall, the Commission’s former chairman, then-mayor “Lamar (Hernandez-Thorpe) refused to fill vacancies until they didn’t have a quorum anymore. People started quitting because they could see their volunteer work was going to waste and they had better uses for their time. I asked Lamar to fill the vacancies, but he didn’t.”

Downtown Security Services

Under Item 6, on the agenda, the Council will discuss downtown security services for City owned parking lots, property and public areas, and provide direction to staff on whether to initiate a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process for private security services in the Rivertown/Downtown area.

It follows the meetings held with and incorporates feedback received from downtown business owners and community members regarding hours of operation, patrol locations, scope of services and other identified needs.

Emergency Fuel Purchase Up to $500,000

Under Item 8, the Council will vote on purchasing fuel on an emergency basis through December 31, 2026, in an amount not to exceed $500,000, including applicable taxes, fees, delivery charges, and other associated costs,

to cover both the payment of outstanding fuel invoices accrued from July 1, 2026, through August 31, 2026, in the amount of $178,042.33 and the purchase of fuel necessary to maintain City operations until December 31, 2026, while City staff continue efforts to secure a new service provider for a long-term fuel supply agreement.

On April 28, 2026, the City Council approved a cooperative purchase agreement with Hunt and Sons for the purchase and delivery of unleaded and renewable diesel fuel for City operations. Hunt and Sons have not been able to meet the City’s insurance requirements and are therefore not able to perform this service under the terms of the agreement.

Since July 1, 2026, the City has continued receiving fuel deliveries from Hunt and Sons while staff, under consultation with the City Attorney’s Office, worked with the vendor to resolve the insurance requirements. The outstanding invoices will continue to accrue twice weekly as future fuel deliveries are made.

Annual Report on Use of State and Federal Housing and Homeless Funds

Under Item 9 the Council will receive public comments and vote on approving the Fiscal Year 2025–26 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

According to the City staff report, “The CAPER details the individual goals and achievements of funded agencies during the first year (FY 2025-26) of the 2025-30 Consolidated Plan. Most agencies exceeded their goals. Below is a summary of the Priority Goals and Annual Strategies that received funding in FY 2025-26. Funding sources below are identified by their stated abbreviation for funds committed and expended:

• Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding from the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development;

• Housing Successor (HS) funding authorized by the State for expenditure on affordable housing and homeless services; and

• Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funding from the State for expenditure on affordable housing and homeless services.

A total of $1,701,909.45 was spent on the various programs and a balance of $144,428.20 in Habitat for Humanity Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation funds was carried over to and will be expended in FY26-27.

Breakdown of Residents Served

According to the FY 2025-26 Summary, “Funding from the City of Antioch Community Grants Program served a total of 6,497 Antioch residents during the past year for 148% of the cumulative goal of 4,398. Of the total Antioch residents served by all programs:

• 68.8% had household incomes of 30% or less AMI (Average Median Income);

• 28.7% had incomes of 50% to 31% AMI; and

• 2.5 had incomes of 80% to 51% AMI.

The demographic breakdown of all served against the demographics of the City of Antioch is provided in the chart above.

The report also states, “Overall, community-service activities exceeded the cumulative annual service goal, with most participating agencies meeting or exceeding their individual goals. Several affordable-housing activities remain in progress or below their annual production goals and will require continued monitoring, financial reconciliation, and follow-up during FY 2026–27.”

Increasing Investigative Services Contract for Police Department to Comply with DOJ, Allen Agreements

Under Item 10, the Council will consider approving Amendment No. 2 to the contract with Chaplin and Hill Investigative Services, increasing the contract amount by $250,000 for continued investigative services “required pursuant to the USDOJ MOU, the Allen Agreement, and applicable City policies and procedures,” according to the City staff report.

Also, according to City staff, “To maintain public confidence and uphold the integrity of internal investigations, the Antioch Police Department must ensure that its process for handling allegations of misconduct is impartial and consistent with applicable federal requirements. Engaging independent, external professional investigators provides an objective means of conducting investigations involving allegations of misconduct and other matters requiring an independent review.

“This approach is consistent with national law enforcement best practices and standards. The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)…recommends the use of external investigators to promote fairness and impartiality in law enforcement investigations.”

City Employee Confidential Unit One-Year 3% COLA

Under Item 11, the Council will vote on approving a Tentative Agreement with the Confidential Unit of City employees which includes a one-year 3% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) and benefits for FY2026/27 at a cost of $123,000 with $103,000 from the General Fund. The Confidential Unit includes a variety of staff positions: the Deputy City Clerk, Account Specialists, Analysts, Assistants, Coordinators, Specialists and Technicians. The 26 employees in the Unit have been working without a contract since September 30, 2025. See City’s Master Salary Schedule.

CONSENT CALENDAR

More Traffic Calming Devices

After approving the expenditure of a little over $500,000 for the traffic calming devices on Sycamore Drive on Aug. 25, under Item 5.P. on the Consent Calendar, the Council will consider awarding the construction agreement to Consolidated Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $168,495 with a contingency of $30,000 for a total contract amount of $198,495 for the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Project.

It consists of the installation of speed hump systems, signage and thermoplastic striping. There will be a total of eight speed hump systems constructed on the following streets:

• Sunset Drive between Diablo and Beasley Avenues;
• E. Tregallas Road between Center Lane and Garrow Drive;
• Wildflower Drive between Larkspur Drive and Lupine Court;
• W. Madill Street between D and G Streets;
• D Street between the Railroad and Texas Street;
• East 19th Street between Acacia and Deodar Avenues;
• Sunset Lane between Northridge and Daphne Courts; and
• Candlewood Way between Arroyo and Stagecoach Ways.

According to the City staff report, funding for the project will be from the FY 25/26 Capital Improvement Budget which has a balance of $292,292 carried over into the FY 26/27 budget of $250,000 for a total of $542,292 from Measure J Funds. Following procurement of the contract and an estimated 10% of $16,850 for construction engineering, management, inspection, testing and contract administration, that will leave an estimated fund balance of $326,947.

More Water Park Repairs & Improvements

Under Item 5.Q. the Council will consider approving an amendment to the construction agreement with Top Line Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $78,232.98, for a total contract amount of $276,732.98 for Prewett Water Park Concrete Improvements 2026 Project; and under Item 5.R. they will vote on approving a second amendment to the construction agreement with Adams Pool Solutions in the amount of $63,034, for a total contract amount of $855,632 for the Prewett Water Park Pool Resurfacing Project; and approving a budget amendment to the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Capital Improvement and Operating Budgets utilizing General Funds for the project by $75,000.

Allocate & Reallocate State Violence Intervention & Prevention Grant Funds

Under Item 5.S, on the Consent Calendar, the Council will vote on approving a budget amendment to appropriate and reappropriate California Violence Intervention and Prevention (CalVIP) Cohort 5 Grant funds across Fiscal Years 2025–26 through 2028–29, consistent with the approved grant award and anticipated expenditure schedule.

According to the City staff report, “On March 10, 2026, the City Council authorized acceptance of $2,066,775 in CalVIP Cohort 5 funding administered by BSCC. At that time, Council appropriated $112,000 for anticipated Fiscal Year 2025–26 expenditures and directed that the remaining grant balance be incorporated into subsequent fiscal-year budgets consistent with the grant term and approved spending plan.

“CalVIP is a competitive State grant program supporting jurisdictions disproportionately impacted by violent crime through evidence-based violence interruption, prevention, and intervention strategies. The City’s Cohort 5 award continues and expands upon violence intervention infrastructure established through prior CalVIP funding beginning in 2022.

“CalVIP Cohort 5 supports the City’s continued violence intervention and prevention activities, including personnel dedicated to program administration, violence intervention and outreach; community-based services and partnerships; participant supports; evaluation and performance measurement; and other activities authorized under the approved grant agreement.

“Because the…Cohort 5 grant extends across multiple City fiscal years, expenditure authority must be appropriately budgeted within each fiscal year in which grant-funded costs are anticipated.

The proposed budget amendment…establishes and adjusts appropriations across Fiscal Years 2025–26 through 2028–29 to align the City’s financial budget with the anticipated timing of…Cohort 5 expenditures.

Meeting Details

The Regular meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 200 H Street, in historic, downtown Rivertown and can be viewed via livestream on the City’s website, on Comcast cable TV channel 24 or AT&T U-verse channel 99 or on the City’s YouTube channel.

See the complete agenda packet with staff reports here.

Following protest march from theater to City Hall.

Mayor called “Satan”, blamed for helping church purchase it which he later refuted; some attacked church, too; Bernal calls false comments “unfortunate”

Council also approved name & title changes to City’s newest department, staff; two additional temp positions; ADU designs; purchased SeeClickFix app software

By Allen D. Payton

Before dealing with the few items on the light agenda during their meeting Tuesday night, the three Antioch City Council members in attendance each heard an earful from members of the public about the pending sale of the El Campanil Theatre to a church. Since the matter was not placed on the agenda even for discussion by the council, residents had to speak during General Public comments at both the beginning and end of the meeting. A total of 18 people spoke in person and one spoke via Zoom. (See 3:30:00 mark of meeting video)

While the seating for the audience was almost full, only the mayor and two council members were in attendance, as Mayor Pro Tem and District 3 Councilman Don Freitas was out of town, as he announced at the end of a council meeting earlier this year, and District 1 Councilwoman Tamisha Torres-Walker was absent due to a migraine. She said due to the light agenda, she felt she could miss the meeting, and her colleagues could handle the items without her, which they did.

Following Public Comments, the council members took action to rename the Public Safety and Community Resources Department to the Community Services Department and the titles for the staff positions, as well as, to use state grant funds for two temporary positions in that department. They also adopted pre-approved Accessory Dwelling Unit plans for residents to use and voted to purchase software for the City’s SeeClickFix app.

Public Comments Get Harsh, Include Attacks on Mayor, Council, Church

Following a protest march from the theater to City Hall before the council meeting in which, according to Joy Motts, about 15 people participated holding signs and a banner that read, “Save El Campanil Save Our Stage”, several residents spoke during Public Comments at the beginning of the meeting. They were each allotted the same three minutes to share their thoughts.

Some took out their anger on Mayor Ron Bernal, about the sale by the current, private owner of the theater building and all related equipment, to a church, blaming the mayor for helping make it happen, and for every other problem the City is currently facing. One attempted to tie him to President Trump, the Heritage Foundation’s national Project 2025 agenda and the national MAGA movement. She also labeled the Hispanic pastor and his church members “Christian Nationalists, racist” and “full of hate for everybody that is not White.”

The first person to speak, resident Leslie May, who is a regular council meeting attendee and public speaker, made most of those remarks saying she, “was very disturbed about this El Campanil. I already know for a fact that you were the one, Mayor Ron Bernal, that went and told him,” claiming he spoke with Pastor Eli Herrera of Legendary Movement Church whose purchase offer was accepted by the owner.

However, Bernal refuted that in response to questions from the Herald in an article published on Thursday. Asked if he helped the church purchase the theater, Bernal responded simply, “No.”

May continued with what she’s been “telling these people in person, on Facebook and Instagram about you. I told them you are not for Antioch…you are nothing but Satan. You are.” She then repeated comments posted on Facebook by another resident that Bernal is, “Selling out Antioch for his Project 2025” and a “MAGA cult mayor.”

“You brought him here. You were a member of his church years ago before you broke off. You are friends with him,” May continued speaking of the mayor’s connection to Herrera. However, Herrera is quoted in another Herald article about the theater being sold to his church saying, “I’m a very good friend of Ron Bernal, before he was mayor. I served at Cornerstone Christian Center for about a year for their school and youth ministry,” referring to the church where Bernal has attended, but mentioned nothing of the mayor helping him with the purchase. Herrera’s older brother Ruben, the pastor of La Palabra de Dios church in Antioch said he considered buying the theater before Eli’s church made their offer.

May then made more unsubstantiated claims saying the church is “Christian Nationalists, are racist, they’re full of hate for everybody that is not White.” However, Herrera is Hispanic as are many if not most of his church’s members.

“They spread falsehoods…because they’re just Satan’s minions. Just like I said, you are,” she continued addressing Bernal. “You guys are wrong. I say prayer works wonders, you guys. Psalm 109, read it over and over again so, we can get rid of you and all your little minions who walk the streets of Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, whatever.”

The next person to speak was Greg Feere, the “retired vice president of the California State Building Trades,” who said he is “a 40-year resident of Antioch.” He complained about, “An out of area investor wanting to flip it just to make some money. He really doesn’t care about Antioch’s future,” referring to current owner Tung Bui who explained why he purchased and is now selling it, as did the former executive director and theater board president, Rick Carraher who lined up the sale in 2023, both refuting Feere’s claims. (See related articles here, here and here)

He continued, “Yesterday…I called (State Senator) Tim Grayson and I asked him about whether or not we can put the El Campanil under the historical preservation site and he said, ‘yes.’ He said, ‘but it would have to be coordinated with the City of Antioch.’”

“So, I think you can take the effort and make it the preservation site and keep it exactly what it’s supposed to be. It’s a theater. It’s a great place,” he continued. “And, you know, no offense to the pastor, but, you know, he can stay in Pittsburg and there’s plenty of souls and sinners there to take care of.”

Many speakers mainly said they wanted the theater to remain a place for arts and culture in the city.

The theatre’s current Operations Manager John “Johnny” Hackencamp shared his thoughts saying, “I’m here as a resident, as a longtime employee…for almost 20 years and as a person who’s mad that the building got sold and that the council just continues to sit on their hands, not only in this, but in many, many dealings for decades. Maybe the City should investigate whether or not the sale of the building was actually legal.”

“You guys have an attorney, and I think it’s time that this council decides to do something,” he concluded.

Former Planning Commissioner Kerry Motts said, “I want to encourage the council to explore all options within its rights to explore the delay or cancellation of escrow for a change in the ownership of the El Campanil.”

Antioch Chamber of Commerce Board President Jim Becker said, “I’m here to support the El Campanil, too. The owner said, ‘well, it’s been up for sale for a while.’ But I didn’t learn about this until just about a week-and-a-half ago that, this building was up for sale. So, I reached out to some of my real estate friends and I said, ‘if you’re going to sell a building like this, what do you do?’ They said, ‘we reach out to other like, type organizations just to see if any of them wants to buy it.’ So, I called some that I know. I called The Lesher Center for the Arts (in Walnut Creek), I called Masquers Playhouse (in Point Richmond), I called the California Theatre (in Pittsburg). I said, ‘did anybody reach out to you and tell you this is for sale?’ They said, ‘no’. So, I said, ‘OK, something doesn’t smell right, there.’”

“So, then I said, ‘OK, well, maybe they approached some of the arts foundations,’” Becker continued. “I called Hewlett  Packard, I called the Lesher Foundation, others. Nobody knew the building was for sale.”

“Well, how odd is that, that if the intent is to really, we keep it as an event space, as a theater space, as a culture space, that the folks that are most likely to do that weren’t aware?” he asked rhetorically. “So, that really does bother me a lot, right?”

Becker then ended with, “When churches take over your prime retail space, cities die, economically. We cannot have that happen. We have to preserve our economic vitality in this city. We have to preserve an economically viable downtown, and we have to save our theater.”

According to the Property Record report purchased by the Herald, it shows the listing agent, representing the seller, is Kellie Temby, and the buyer’s agent is Michael Temby. But Michael told the Herald when he was contacted last week for more details about this year’s sale, “I have no comments at this time while we’re in escrow. Happy to answer any questions after escrow closes.” According to Herrera, that will be on Sept. 29th.

Reading from prepared notes, Jeanette Rodriguez spoke next saying, “I am back to express my discontent with the handling of El Campanil.” She then read from the City’s Vision and Strategic Plan for 2019 to 2029 and said, “The Vision states, ‘Antioch is a desired destination in the Bay Area: Building on our historic legacy, creating bright opportunities for families to grow, offering places to play, enabling businesses to thrive and cultivating a unique downtown experience.’ Goals 5 and 6 state, ‘Strive to be a Healthy Community’ and ‘Support Historic Downtown Revitalization’.”

“The loss of this historic space directly goes against what our City’s vision is,” Rodriguez continued. “The arts have positive impacts on community well-being, economic development, public safety, youth development and social justice.”

She then took swipes at the church members who attended the community meeting at the theater on Tuesday, Sept. 1st. (See related article)

“I feel let down and I wish there had been more alarms raised, sooner so that the community could have had more time to organize and find a solution, as you see here, now. There needs to be more accountability in the future or else, what is there left to protect in Antioch,” Rodriguez concluded.

Resident Krystl Law spoke next also reading from prepared remarks saying, “So, last year, Tamisha Walker and Don Freitas started to work on the theater with the previous (City) manager Bessie Scott talking about using development impact fees. We have millions just sitting there idle. So, why is it that we can’t start there?” That question was answered by Torres-Walker and Acting Community and Economic Development Director Kevin Scudero in the Herald’s article published on Thursday, Sept. 10th.

“Why is that we are waiting to the last minute to decide to save something that is clearly dear to everyone’s hearts?” she asked and then launched into a litany of complaints against Bernal. “You are stubborn and set in your ways. You chose to spread lies about Homekey. You chose to retire before the FBI came in to do their investigations. You chose to go after a Black woman city manager who tried to call out inconsistencies with SMI and your friend, Sean McCauley.  You chose not to speak about a Black woman who was hit by an officer. You chose to put everything on the last city council when you were city manager from 2017 to 2021. When will you take responsibility for your actions? You chose to spend $499,000 on sweeps instead of Homekey. You chose to not talk to Ms. Walker and Freitas about the theater.”

That was addressed in Bernal’s comments to the Herald in the article published on Thursday, Sept. 10th. When asked if he was aware the theater was for sale this year before it went public last month Bernal responded, “Yes. As Tamisha may have told you she, Don and Bessie were working together to find out more about it. I was not involved due to obvious Brown Act implications,” referring to the state’s Open Meeting Law preventing a majority of council members from discussing matters that could be on a future council meeting agenda. (See 5th to last section of article.)

“When is it you’re going to take responsibility and step up and be a mayor?” Law asked in conclusion.

Rivertown business owner and citizen Kathy Cabrera spoke next reading from prepared remarks and saying, “I’m here tonight to ask you to do something that future generations of Antioch residents will either thank us for or wish we had done, and that is saving the El Campanil Theatre. It’s a place of Antioch’s history. We spend a lot of time talking about Antioch’s future and we should. But building a better future does not require us to destroy our past. Because once the El Campanil is gone it’s gone forever.”

“It’s easy to build, yet another church,” she continued. “But already have over 100 of those here, in Antioch and we cannot re-create a nearly century-old piece of history.”

“Please don’t let the El Campanil Theatre an old photograph of something we used to have. Take action. Put this sale on hold,” Cabrera exclaimed. “Give this community the opportunity to fight for the El Campanil before you allow anyone to give up on it. Leave this meeting saying, ‘we’re going to do something the community is asking us to do.’ Give Antioch a chance to save its history.”

She mentioned the requests by District 1 Councilwoman Monica Wilson, Torres-Walker and Freitas about preserving the theater and asked, “Why did these requests fall on deaf ears?” That was also mentioned in the Herald article published Thursday, Sept. 10th. (See sub-headline entitled, “One Councilmember Made Requests to Agendize Protection, But Not Purchase of El Campanil Theater”).

Cabrera concluded by saying, “Save the El Campanil Theatre, not just for those of us who remember its past but for those generations who deserve to experience its future. I beg of you to save the El Campanil. And thank you, Monica.”

A resident named Margie Carrell then offered more unsubstantiated claims saying, “Ron, you’ve already made up your mind. You’re not going to listen to these people. You do not care. You’ve already made a deal with your, what is it, your pastor? What does he have on you? What is he hiding? What happened in 2017, let’s see, when you left being our city manager? What did you go into, rehab? Did they pay for it? So, you’re on the books. We got you. So, don’t try to pretend like you really care about what’s going to happen…because you owe your church people.”

Bernal retired as city manager in 2021 following a 36-year career in public service and a 36-career in public service including 23 years with the City of Antioch. (See related article) According to his LinkedIn profile, following his retirement, he started a company in 2022 named Ron Bernal Consulting working as a management consultant, which he still owns and can operate as a part-time elected official.

A resident named Mary Jo Mundy-Bruce who said she “worked at El Campanil in 2023 when it sold,” as the bookkeeper. “Clearly there was some broken down piece that happened. This should not have been sold to a private person. Something was not right,” she stated. “This part I was not aware of. I wish I could go back in time and say, ‘hey, Rick, what are you doing, why are you selling this place?”

“I just think the sale should be put on hold, and some investigation should go into the 2023 sale,” Mundy-Bruce continued. “So, somebody be as passionate as we are. Hello, Ron. Be as passionate as we are. This is your city, right now. Please…do the right thing.”

“Thank you, for what you are doing,” she stated. “But, man, you gotta step it up, guy. Come on, step it up so, we can be like, ‘yay, I voted for Ron. I feel so good he saved this.”

“Put the sale on hold. We don’t need another church. No more churches. We got enough churches,” Mundy-Bruce exclaimed. “I just can’t believe the lack and the apathy of everything sometimes. Why is there so much apathy here? I understand your hands are tied and there’s things and bureaucracy.”

“Please do something,” she concluded.

A woman named Nicole, who said she “goes by Fay”, wearing an El Campanil Theatre Academy logo shirt, said she did “19 years of theater,” and spoke of helping with children at the Academy in 2021. “I was just hoping there would be something there for kids. If we could save it…it would be really good for future generations of kids. Theater is life-saving.”

“I want my kids to be able to go that theater and enjoy it when I have kids. There are so many kids that got to enjoy it and perform on that stage and I want them to be able to do that again,” she added.

Bernal Responds Saying the Council “Can’t Say A Lot” About Theatre Sale

Following public comments and a nine-minute break during which most residents had left the Council Chambers, the council moved on to the matters that were on the agenda including Council Communications and the Mayor’s Comments. Bernal took the opportunity to address the issue of the theater’s sale after thanking “everybody who came out tonight to speak in support of keeping the theater as an arts location and the passion and the unity in the room it’s…great to see.”

“Unfortunately, some folks say things that aren’t necessarily true which is unfortunate. But that happens,” he stated. “The City of Antioch in our current position is not able to speak to what’s happening related to this escrow, that we understand the church currently has the building in contract.”

“And so, we are doing our own research,” Bernal continued. “We are doing everything we can to make sure we’re informed about what’s going on. But we are not able to say anything about that. So, that’s where we stand as a city council and why you’re not hearing us say a lot about the situation right now.”

“But we will be providing updates as we’re able to,” he added.

Proclamations

The Council then voted 3-0 to approve a proclamation honoring the 25th Anniversary of 9-11, Patriot Day and National Day of Service and Remembrance and presented it to Antioch Police Captain Desmond Bittner. (See related article).

Bittner said, “It’s my honor to receive this on behalf of the men and women of the Antioch Police Department and the men and women of the Contra Costa Fire Department who could not be here today and the veterans in both departments. I will share this with them tomorrow.”

They also approved by a 3-0 vote a proclamation recognizing September as Suicide Prevention Month in the city and presented it to Megan Shinkle, Director of Peer Connections Centers with locations in Antioch and San Pablo. She thanked the council and spoke of her organization’s work, providing support to those with mental health challenges, who may or may not be in recovery, as well.  They offer groups to support wellness, one on one support, links to resources, and outings to museums, parks and other points of interest.

The mayor and council members then took photos with each of the recipients.

Name, Title Changes for Newest City Department, Positions

Under item 5 on the agenda, the Council conducted a public hearing and voted 3-0 to rename the Public Safety and Community Resources Department as the Community Services Department and the classification title changes from Public Safety and Community Resources Director to Community Services Director and Public Safety Manager to Community Engagement Manager, subject to completion of applicable labor-relations requirements. Although Wilson had originally voted for the confusing department name, she made the motion to make the change and voted for it.

As previously reported, at the urging of Mayor Pro Tem and District 3 Councilman Don Freitas, during their meeting on Tuesday, May 26, 2026, (under agenda item 10) the Council agreed to correct and clear up confusion of including the words “Public Safety” in the name of City’s the newest department formed by the council in 2022, but is not part of the police department nor deals with fire services and was the brainchild of Torres-Walker using an expanded definition of the term. The councilmembers also voted to change the titles of the department’s staff. (See 6:39:50 mark of meeting video)

The council approved the new department in February 2022 on a 4-1 vote. At that time, Torres-Walker tried to redefine and expand the meaning of public safety. But the department’s name has caused confusion because the majority of people don’t define the term the same as she does.

According to the staff report for the item, “As the department’s responsibilities continued to expand, the City Council also began discussing whether the department’s name accurately reflected its mission and public facing role. During several public and administrative discussions, Council considered various naming alternatives intended to better describe the department’s functions and distinguish its community-based services from the law enforcement responsibilities of the Antioch Police Department.”

Name Already Changed on City Website

As previously reported, the department’s page on the City’s website already had the new name in the header, but not in the text below, still including the word “resources”. That reads, “The City of Antioch’s Department of Community Services Resources is committed to building a safer, healthier, and more resilient community…The Community Services Resources (CSRD) Department works to strengthen community well-being through prevention, intervention, and support services. CSRD houses the City’s Youth Services Network, Housing and Unhoused Services, and Violence Intervention & Prevention Division, providing programs and resources that promote safety, stability, and opportunity for all residents.”

Two Temporary State Grant-Funded Positions for the Renamed Department

Then under item 6, the Council approved on a vote of 3-0 the establishment of two limited-term, grant-funded hourly positions to support the City’s direct implementation of community violence intervention, violence prevention, community outreach, case coordination, resource navigation, and community engagement activities. The proposed positions’ titles also retain the word resources: Community Resources Specialist.

The proposed hourly salary range for each of the positions is $39.54 – $48.07.

According to the staff report, the City has been awarded $2,034,800 through the Board of State and Community Corrections’ California Violence Intervention and Prevention (CalVIP) Grant Program with an authorized grant period through Sept. 30, 2029. The approved grant provides funding for two positions to support implementation of the City’s community violence intervention and prevention activities.

Consent Calendar – ADU Plans Approved for Accelerator Program That Ends Sept. 30

District 2 Councilman Louie Rocha asked to be removed item item 4.I. on the Consent Calendar agenda regarding pre-approved Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) plans developed through the ADU Accelerator program, for discussion and questions for staff.

He mentioned the program at Antioch High School in which students build ADU’s and that he wanted to make sure whatever they’re doing complies with the City’s plans.

However, “these City plans do not supersede any ADU’s that they’re doing as long as they’re compliant with state building code,” Acting Community Development & Economic Development Director Kevin Scudero responded.

With no public comments on the item, the council voted 3-0 to approve the pre-approved ADU plans.

According to the ADU Accelerator Rebate Program information on the City’s website, ADUs are attached or detached residential dwelling units that provide complete independent living facilities for one or more persons on a lot with an existing (or proposed) primary residence.

The State Senate District 7 ADU Accelerator Program, piloted by former State Senator Steve Glazer, is composed of 15 cities in the East Bay of the San Francisco Bay Area, including Antioch.

The program provides individual rebates of up to $7,500 to property owners for new ADU units and up to $30,000 for new ADU units that are deed restricted to low-income households (minimum of 20 years.) As the purpose of the program is to encourage the construction of smaller ADU units, there will be no rebates for units over 1,000 square feet.

The City is matching the low-income rebate amounts with Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funding to double the rebates for low-income ADUs to encourage low-income ADU production in Antioch. Antioch homeowners will be able to access up to $30,000 for the construction of a low-income ADU less than 500 square feet.

However, according to the staff report for the agenda item, the rebate program provides individual rebates up to only $15,000 for ADUs that are deed restricted to low-income households (minimum of 20 years.)  An email was sent to City staff asking which is the correct amount.

Acting Community and Economic Development Director Kevin Scudero responded, “The ADU Accelerator Program offered up to $15,000 in rebates for the construction of ADU’s. The City of Antioch also had Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program (PLHA) funds allocated towards ADU’s and chose to provide matching funds for deed restricted affordable ADU’s to further incentivize their production. This is why you see the larger rebate number on our website.”

The City of Antioch was granted $216,228.77 for rebates, which was based upon a per capita calculation, and $50,000 to create free permit-ready or pre-approved plans for public use.

The second component of the ADU Accelerator program is the development and adoption of free pre-approved ADU plans which will be free for residents to use.

While the rebate program has been available to homeowners in Antioch since October 1, 2024, it will close September 30, 2026. Staff were also asked if the termination date is correct and if so, why is the council just now being asked to adopt the pre-approved plans.

Scudero also responded, “Yes, the termination date is correct. In addition to the ADU rebates, the program also provided $50,000 in funding to develop pre-approved ADU Plans. The development of the pre-approved plans was on a dual track with the rebate program. The pre-approved plans are not specific to the ADU’s receiving rebates and will be available to anyone in the future who would like to construct an ADU in Antioch.”

SeeClickFix Application Programming Interface Software Purchase

All other items on the Consent Calendar were approved on a vote of 3-0. They included item 4.H., an increase to the current Agreement with Tyler Technologies Enterprise Permitting & Licensing (EP&L) for recurring Software as a Service (SaaS) fees and additional support services for a total agreement amount not-to exceed $235,000 per year. The council is also being asked to memorializing the recurring SaaS services which automatically renew each year throughout the term of the contract, which is consistent with the Agreement but inaccurately described in the original resolution.

The software serves the City’s SeeClickFix Application Programming Interface (API).

According to the staff report, the Initial approval by City Council in January of 2021 authorized an amount not to exceed $800,000, for a term ending June 30, 2025. The addition of the SeeClickFix Application Programming Interface (API) allows increased functionality for Code Enforcement complaints that are submitted via the SeeClickFix system, improving Code Case creation and response times, and streamlined updates to the public on complaint status via SeeClickFix. We are in the testing phases currently, and plan to fully implement the API by or before the end of this calendar year.

The Council adjourned the meeting at a rare, early 9:14 p.m.

See meeting video.

Carraher says he worked to fulfill 2001 Board vote and 2003 commitment to City Council

Yet, all but two on city council, staff, and other theater board and staff in 2022 or 2023 say they didn’t speak to the other side prior to sale

Theater board, staff unaware of 2022 state law that might have prevented first sale to private party

Sale of theater was not made public by board either in 2023 or this year

By Allen D. Payton

In response to reports by the Herald regarding the purchase by a church of Antioch’s 98-year-old El Campanil Theatre building in the City’s historic, downtown Rivertown, members of the public and this reporter have been posing questions to decision makers and city leaders and conducting research on the original funding for the purchase and renovations in 2002 and 2003, and the first sale to a private party in 2023. Now that the City’s website includes copies of council meeting agendas and minutes dating back to 1997, searches have resulted in discovering a commitment made by the then-president of the El Campanil Theatre Preservation Foundation that the building would be “turned over free and clear to the City” if they were “unable to pay their bills” and a foundation board vote in 2001 giving the City “right-of-first-refusal to the building” if the non-profit “corporation is no longer able to function.”

But when the foundation ran into post-COVID financial difficulties, neither the transfer of the almost 11,000 square foot building happened nor is their proof or confirmation that the theater was first offered to the City before it was sold to a private party in 2023.

In addition, according to a resident and confirmed in state law, prior to the disposition of “all or substantially all” of a charitable non-profit organization’s assets, they are required to inform the California Attorney General for his office’s review and satisfaction. But prior to the sale in 2023, that didn’t happen either.

Summary

Rick Carraher, a former downtown business owner, the former president of the Rivertown Business District Association which initiated the effort to purchase and renovate the building in 2001, a former member of the City’s Economic Development Commission, as well as the theater’s first board president, first executive director, and later, board member, and the visionary behind the effort, made the 2003 commitment to the City Council before they voted to contribute $750,000 in redevelopment funds to help renovate the building and theater inside.

Carraher stated in an interview with the Herald this past week, “And I think in good faith we did that. The City was approached, first and the mayor and city manager knew of the theater’s financial difficulties,” before the 2023 sale, which Carraher also lined up.

By then, he had stepped down as executive director and again served on the board of directors of the foundation. (See related article)

Then in 2009, in a letter to the mayor and council when seeking a guarantee for the loan to replace the theater building’s HVAC system, Carraher disclosed the 2001 vote by the foundation’s board of directors that gave the City of Antioch the right-of-first refusal to the assets of the non-profit corporation if it could no longer function.

Carraher (pronounced “CARE-uh-her”) said the building was sold to the current owner because he was committed to maintaining the venue for the arts, which the owner reiterated. (See related article)

The theater’s visionary also explained in detail what transpired in 2023 sharing that the then-mayor mentioned to the then-board president one million dollars that was possibly available.

“But that never materialized,” Carraher stated. “So, we started looking for private investors.”

However, both of those people said they spoke to each other about the matter after the theater building was sold that year.

Background

The building includes the theater and three retail spaces on W. 2nd Street, and offices inside upstairs. Two of the street-level spaces are leased to local businesses. The foundation leases the rest of the building, using the third, street-level space as the ticket office. According to Carraher the 2023 sale included the building and all the equipment.

According to the History page on the theater’s website, which he wrote, the building was built in 1928, and it and the theater inside were “owned and operated by the Stamm family for 75 Years, or until 2003. In 2001, a small group of local citizens, including representatives of the Rivertown Business District Association, approached the City of Antioch with their desire to find a way to acquire and restore El Campanil, and to convert its use to one supportive of the Rivertown Renaissance plan. The…Association took the lead in securing funding from Calpine for the development of a comprehensive business plan…” That was the $50,000 initial contribution from Calpine, Carraher shared.

The theater’s history continues, “In July 2002, El Campanil Theatre Preservation Foundation was incorporated as a charitable, non-profit 501(c)3 organization. In early 2003, Calpine Corporation and the City of Antioch entered into an agreement whereby the Foundation received a grant to acquire the Theatre. In July 2003, El Campanil Theatre Preservation Foundation purchased the Theatre and began the process of converting the building to a community performing arts venue.”

Calpine granted the foundation $500,000 for purchase of the building from the Stamm family. Prior to the sale, another church, Fortress Christian Center, had previously rented and occupied the building for several years.

Thanks to Herald reader, Michelle Kuslits, who provided a copy of the minutes for the City Council meeting on Dec. 16, 2003, they show that before the 4-0 vote approving $750,000 in City redevelopment funds for renovations to the building, a commitment was made by Carraher, the then-foundation board president. According to that meeting’s agenda, the council was initially asked, “to provide direction to staff regarding funding of (an additional) $500,000 for the purchase of essential equipment and improvements for renovations to the El Campanil Theatre.” Then-mayor and now-Mayor Pro Tem Don Freitas was absent during the meeting but was supportive of both the $500,000 Calpine grant for the building’s purchase and funding from the City for renovations. (As previously reported, Freitas informed the Herald last week he would be unreachable for the following two weeks).

Building Was to “Be Turned Over Free and Clear to the City of Antioch”

According to the meeting minutes (see page 6), “Rick Carraher, President of the El Campanil Preservation Foundation, distributed a handout to the Council and gave a slide presentation on the history and the preservation goals of the El Campanil Preservation Foundation.

“Rick Carraher added this theatre would be used by a number of other community groups, including fund raising efforts for other groups. Regarding the City’s investment in this project, Mr. Carraher stated all monies would be dedicated to equipment and other tangible assets only, and would not pay any bills or consultants with the exception of the restoration plan itself which would be critical to the next phase. Furthermore, 100 percent of the monies would be put back into the theatre.

“Mr. Carraher also stated if the Theatre Preservation Foundation should, in the future, become unable to pay their bills, the Theatre would still have a high value, and the investment would be turned over free and clear to the City of Antioch, therefore the building and all of its contents and improvements would transfer to the City thus ensuring the facility would remain a community treasure.”

However, nothing to that effect was included in the motion adopted by the council. It read, “On motion by Councilmember (Jim) Conley and seconded by Councilmember (Brian) Kalinowski, the Council approving the allocation of $750,000 from the Promenade project to the El Campanil project with the stipulation the funds be repaid with RDA monies as they become available.” RDA refers to the City’s redevelopment agency, which no longer exists. The other two council members at that time were then-Mayor Pro Tem Jim Davis and Councilman Arne Simonsen.

For accuracy, minutes of government meetings are not verbatim and without the video of the meeting, which is not currently available on the City’s website, it’s not known what, if anything the council members said about Carraher’s stated commitment.

When reached for comment, Simonsen shared, “The City Attorney was supposed to put conditions on the property so that it would stay a nonprofit.”

While he claims his commitment was not binding on the theater foundation’s board, Carraher said they made the effort to first offer it to the City to take control either through outright ownership or some form of a partnership prior to the 2023 sale.

2001 Board Resolution Offering City “Right of First Refusal”

However, a commitment was made in writing. After finding it during a search of City files, City Attorney Lori Asuncion (pronounced uh-SUN-shun), on Tuesday, Sept. 8th, provided to the Herald a copy of the City staff report for an agenda item for the council meeting on Jan. 13, 2009, regarding the City guaranteeing the foundation’s loan for the HVAC system replacement that year. It contains a letter on foundation letterhead dated January 7, 2009, from then-executive director, Carraher to then-Mayor James Davis and the city and council which reads, “On March 9, 2001, the Board of Directors passed a resolution that gives the City of Antioch the Right of First Refusal to the Assets of the Corporation in the event that the Corporation is no longer able to function.”

An email was sent on Wed., Sept. 9th to current board president, Sharon Sobel Idul requesting a copy of the 2001 resolution. She responded, “I mentioned it to our board members. We’ll have to go digging in physical files. I’ll let you know if and when we find these items,” also referring to a copy of the 2003 agreement between Calpine and the City of Antioch. As of publication time on Friday, Sept. 11th that has not yet occurred.

City Redevelopment Funds

After redevelopment agencies in California were officially dissolved as of February 1, 2012, the City of Antioch has served as both the Successor Agency and the Housing Successor to the former Antioch Development Agency (ADA), the City’s name for its former redevelopment agency.

Public’s Questions About 2023 Sale

A variety of questions were posted in comments on the Antioch Herald Facebook page, by Kuslits, regarding the 2023 sale and she shared information about a law that went into effect on July 1, 2022, requiring notification by the foundation to the California Attorney General at least 20 days prior to the sale.

Kuslits wrote, “There are alot of questions to ask regarding the actions of the El Campanil Preservation Foundation and The City if [sic] Antioch in the 2023 sale and also the use of the grant, redevelopment funds and charitable donations used to renovate it. Those were public funds:” However, the grant was no public funds, as they were given by Calpine, a private company, directly to the foundation. Yet, they were the subject of the agreement between those two parties and the City.

She also asked, “What conditions were attached to the Calpine grant and the City’s redevelopment funds? Were any deed restrictions, public-use requirements, repayment provisions, rights of first refusal or City approval requirements placed on the property? Did the City, former Redevelopment Agency or Successor Agency consent to the Foundation’s 2023 sale of the property to a private, out-of-state purchaser?

“Before or after that sale, did the City investigate whether transferring the property to a nonpublic entity complied with the original grant agreements, redevelopment requirements and charitable purpose for which the property was acquired and renovated?

“Did the 2023 sale trigger any obligation to repay or reimburse the City or its Successor Agency? Was the City notified of the sale, and were any City-held covenants, liens, restrictions or other rights released or terminated?

“This one is very important: ‘Were the California Attorney General’s requirements governing the disposition of a charitable nonprofit’s principal assets reviewed and satisfied?’

“Were the charitable donations raised to preserve the theater subject to restrictions requiring the property, or the proceeds from its sale, to remain dedicated to a community theater or performing-arts purpose? What protections, if any, remain in effect to ensure that El Campanil continues to be available to the public for performing arts and cultural programming?

Kuslits also asked this reporter some of the same questions, writing, “Did you ask the El Campanil Preservation Foundation: ‘Were the charitable donations raised to preserve the theater subject to restrictions requiring the property or the proceeds from its sale to remain dedicated to a community theater or performing-arts purpose?’ and also: ‘Were the California Attorney General’s requirements governing the disposition of a charitable nonprofit’s principal assets reviewed and satisfied?’ The Foundation should be able to produce its Attorney General notice, appraisal and supporting transaction documents and any Attorney General acknowledgment, waiver or correspondence regarding the 2023 sale.”

2022 State Law Might Have Prevented 2023 Sale

Kuslits was referring to California’s AB 900, from the 2021-22 legislative session. According to For Purpose Law Group, “While it was originally written for charitable trusts, it was designed to close a loophole: before AB 900, California already required similar advance notice from officials of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations (California ‘public benefit’ corporations). Nonprofits that are charitable corporations…are considered ‘entities holding assets subject to a charitable trust’ under the statute.”

According to Church LawCenter.com, “In 2021, California lawmakers passed AB 900, which went into effect on July 1, 2022. This law aimed to add a new section to the Probate Code to fix an inadvertent loophole in the reporting requirements for California charities. The law at issue requires charities to give written notice to the Attorney General at least 20 days before selling, leasing, conveying, exchanging, transferring, or otherwise disposing of all or substantially all their charitable assets.

“On June 23, 2023, the Attorney General’s Office published a regulation interpreting certain aspects of the new law. The regulation is Section 328.1: ‘Notice of Transactions Involving All or Substantially All Assets of Charitable Corporation or Trust, or Assets in Charitable Trust Held by a Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation.’

“Section 328.1(a) defines ‘substantially all’ as follows: ‘an asset or assets equal to or exceeding 75% of the value of all assets held by the charitable corporation or trust at the time of the notice or at any time during the six months before submitting the notice. Notice must be provided if the transaction involves ‘substantially all’ assets under either book value or fair market value.”

So, whether the theater’s foundation board had transferred the building and all of its assets to the City, to fulfill Carraher’s 2003 commitment to the council, or sold the building, as they did in 2023, the requirements of AB 900 were to still be followed but were not, mainly due to ignorance of the law.

THE THEATRE’S SIDE of THE MATTER

Carraher Provides Details

Carraher, who with his wife, Janis, owned Rivertown’s iconic Rick’s on Second restaurant, moved out of state four years ago, but continued to serve on the foundation’s board of directors until last year. He was asked about the 2003 council meeting.

“I remember vividly. My ask was for $500,000 going in,” he stated. “I believe it was Brian Kalinowski, who was very excited about the project, wanted to know what we could do if they gave us an extra $250,000. I was prepared and I pulled out of my satchel and said, ‘we will have the nicest seats inside the theater.’ He had said he had just gone to another theater in the area and came away with duct tape on his backside. We thought it would cost $350,000 for top-of-the-line seats.”

Asked if, in 2023 he had forgotten about his 2003 commitment to the city council Carraher stated, “No, I didn’t forget about it. We had lengthy conversations, for sure, with the city management and it could have been council members. I don’t want to hear anybody say, ‘the city never knew’. We would have never sold that building without letting the city know. Obviously, it was public knowledge, because it was offered to Sean McCauley to whom we made an inquiry.” McCauley owns several buildings in Rivertown and Antioch, and is currently a member of the City’s General Plan Advisory Committee.

“But we were not trying to alert and get the neighbors nervous,” Carraher continued. “When we were raising funds, people were concerned. Since the day I joined, we haven’t stopped raising funds.”

Post-COVID Financial Challenges Led to 2023 Sale

Carraher explained the reason for the private sale in 2023 was due to the post-COVID financial challenges the theater was facing and shared more details.

“After COVID, we lost our major funders,” he stated. “The Hewlett Foundation was consistently contributing $150,000 per year. At one point, they gave us an extra $200,000. We also lost the Lesher Foundation after they looked at our books. They were local so they really dug in. They wanted to make sure we were going to be around in a year. I told them I wasn’t sure we would be. I think they got up to $100,000 per year” in contributions.

“So, our income was $500,000 per year during my time and we stayed afloat,” Carraher continued. “$300,000 came from non-earned income, grants, donations, individual and corporate. Earned income is ticket sales and rentals and hard-earned money. Roughly $100,000 from the $200,000 came from rentals, meaning local, community events and activities, like graduations, the fire department’s bell ringing ceremonies. We had weddings in the theater. We truly were a community theater. The other $100,000 was El Campanil Theatre Presents, like Randy Newman, Debbie Reynolds and more recently, The Association. We had the big bands and In The Mood. Those were in-house productions. We got revenue from ticket sales, primarily, and some sponsors – not a lot.”

“But during COVID, our income dropped and we were heavily dependent on COVID funds,” he explained. “People couldn’t go to the theater, and we had to fight to reopen. Once we did, our attendance had dropped and we continued to have monthly operating costs, like our air conditioning system, our utilities and still had staff to maintain the place. During the lean days our operating expenses were $15,000 a month without putting on shows.”

“We started to get some money but that was used to cover old bills,” Carraher shared. “We didn’t have enough revenue because the attendance was miserable. It took time to get rentals to come. The dance studios were hurting from COVID. They had to ramp back up before they could have recitals, again.”

Asked if that was announced publicly, he said, “People did not know, generally, that the theater was for sale. If you go on social media and tell people, ‘business is crappy,’ and people aren’t coming in, are people going to go there? We weren’t trying to get people to stay away, we were trying to get people to come there. It’s just not how you conduct business. There was a lot of thought that went into this.”

Regarding asking the City, Carraher said, “The meetings were not in a formal setting at council meetings. We let it be known, but there was no response from the City that they would take over the theater. (Then-mayor) Lamar (Hernandez-Thorpe) became aware at that time and he came to the theater and spoke briefly to me and probably Kathie Campbell who was president, and said the City has money to spend on activities, about a million dollars and we thought the City was going to partner with us. Something like federal or block grant funds. But that never materialized. It never came through.”

“We thought, ‘the City doesn’t want us.’ So, we started looking for private investors,” Carraher stated.

Asked again about his commitment to the council during the 2003 meeting Carraher said, “I don’t recall it. But I’m not going to deny I said it. The first offer was to be made to the City. There is no binding agreement.”

Asked about what is written on the History page of the theater’s website about the agreement between Calpine and the City, he said, “I wrote that history. I don’t remember a document, as such.”

“What was discussed at that council meeting was the first offer would be to the City,” Carraher stated. “And I think in good faith we did that. It wasn’t in the documents. It was the spirit and intent of the foundation to the biggest benefactor we had. My term then and it is now they had the right-of-first refusal. If the Lesher Foundation had contributed the most we probably would have approached them.”

“I don’t believe I ever signed anything. It was a spirit of the event,” he reiterated.

Unaware of 2022 Law

Informed of and asked about the requirements of AB 900 Carraher responded, “I wasn’t an attorney with knowledge of non-profit laws. Like most small non-profits, I was familiar with day-to-day operations and requirements. I never received any notice of the bill in question or its revision in 2022.”

History of Purchase by Foundation

As Carraher wrote on the History page of the theater’s website, “In 2001, a small group of local citizens, including representatives of the Rivertown Business District Association, approached the City of Antioch with their desire to find a way to acquire and restore El Campanil, and to convert its use to one supportive of the Rivertown Renaissance plan. The Rivertown Business District Association took the lead in securing funding from Calpine for the development of a comprehensive business plan for El Campanil Theatre. The business plan outlined the best strategies for moving the project forward and VenueTech Management Group, LLC, was retained to develop the plan.”

Carraher was president of the business association at that time.

“The Calpine funding was negotiated by then-city manager Mike Ramsey because Calpine was looking to place a pipeline through the city in the downtown area,” Carraher explained. “They were considering running it underground and having to tear up city streets. The City said we’ll give you the rights to put it under the water.”

“Calpine gave us the first $50,000 just to do the study in 2001,” he said.

Asked if there was an agreement between Calpine and the foundation, he said, “I think the City had an agreement with Calpine for the grant to the foundation.”

So, the foundation was not party to that agreement? he was asked. “No, we weren’t,” Carraher stated.

Asked about the $500,000 donation from Calpine, he said, “It came the day before the purchase in 2003. That was received by the foundation because we were a corporation by then.”

“I was negotiating with George Stamm, Sr. to purchase the building. He said, ‘I’ll give you two years to come up with the money.’ I called him back and we had a meeting the next week and I said, ‘here’s your check.’ George was stunned.”

“Calpine gave us the donation,” Carraher continued. “The funds were deposited. I remember seeing our bank balance with a half-a-million dollars in it.”

Regarding the City and the 2023 sale he said, “I think we were looking at terms of what would be a partnership. We would be willing to let the City own it and we would operate it for them. We were open to discussions, but it never got to that point.”

Asked who from the City did he speak with about the sale, Carraher said, “I remember being introduced to a city manager out front of the theater.” He was referring to then-City Manager Cornelius “Con” Johnson.

“At that time, the rumor was that the City might be interested. But I was not privy to any discussions. It was handled by the president,” Carraher explained.

In 2022, Ramsey was board president, and for a short time in 2023, Frank Giovanni took on the role before Kathie Campbell, who joined the board that year, and later was elected president. At that time Carraher was on the foundation’s board. “Kathie said, ‘I met with Lamar at a mixer and it came up.’ Very informal. It was conversation not commitment,” he explained.

Campbell served as president until last year. Carraher who said he “got the 2023 sale started while I was still living in Antioch,” left the board last November. Sobel Idul was elected board president last November and Campbell later resigned.

Former Board President Kathie Campbell Says She Spoke to Mayor After Sale Occurred

When asked about what Carraher shared Campbell responded, “I was not president when the theatre was sold, that was before my time on the Board. I did speak to Lamar after the sale had gone through, to no avail. Rick and the previous board handled the sale. Per Tung’s post, he worked with Rick to buy the building because they had been working together on the cell tower deal.” She was referring to current owner Tung Bui and the Herald article published last week about his reasons for this year’s sale.

Carraher confirmed that, explaining, “I hired him to be our consultant to negotiate the cell tower project with T-Mobile. When looking for a buyer I asked him to consider it and he made the successful bid.” The tower provided additional revenue for the theater.

Former Board President Frank Giovanni Did Not Talk to Anyone at the City, Provides Additional Details

When reached for comment former board member and president, during 2023, Frank Giovanni said, “I had no conversation with any City official.” He also said he was not aware of the 2022 law.

“The theater was in a bad situation where we had money for two months to run it,” he explained. “We got a hold of Sean McCauley who graciously gave us an audience and graciously gave us a bid. We asked everyone for buyers. I reached out to George Lucas (of Star Wars fame). We were trying to save this jewel.”

“We only had the two offers,” he continued. “Tung said to Rick, ‘why aren’t you giving me an opportunity to buy it?’ He came in with a bid that was better. It was a board decision.”

Giovanni previously held the annual Blues Festival benefit concerts for Antioch students at the theater.

“We gave away $10,000 a year to Antioch schools plus, $5,000 per year for scholarships. When we were done, we were over $100,000 to Antioch schools and music,” he shared.

“No one got paid a dime from our non-profit,” Giovanni added.

“Rick did a great thing for the City and the El Campanil,” he stated. “Rick built a wonderful organization with a clientele that was dying out. As new talent came in you would lose the current customer base. But it was something that could never click over. People aren’t going to the theater anymore. That’s one of the reasons the theater was dying.”

“When Rick was in charge, that place was on point. I think there were plenty of good acts there. Rick did a good job,” Giovanni added.

Former Board President Mike Ramsey Says He Didn’t Speak to Anyone at the City in 2022, Shares About 2003 Purchase

Mike Ramsey served as board president in 2022. When asked if he remembered speaking to anyone from the City he said, “No. I didn’t, fortunately, or unfortunately. I do recall I left the board because I was very disappointed the board was ignoring the financial advice Rick was giving them, that they needed to begin the process of paying off the debts so, when they went out of business all the debts were paid off. They were just burying their heads in the sand.”

“I had no conversations along those lines,” Ramsey reiterated. “But whatever Rick has to say about this is the gospel as far as I’m concerned.”

“He was the only one on that board sticking his neck out and pushing that over and over again and no one on the board wanted to listen to them,” he continued. “He’d done his homework and had spreadsheets and saying we could only last a certain number of months.”

About the 2003 purchase of the building Ramsey said, “Calpine came to me when they came to town and said what can we do to get the City’s support for their gas line that was going to run along the waterfront. I asked them ‘what you can do is give the funds to the El Campanil Theatre to get it back as a performing arts theater, again. Part of my mission of being with the City at that time was trying to revive the downtown. That was a big piece of it. I’m sure they talked with the mayor, they talked to Don to get the council’s support.”

“I said to Calpine that City staff would support them and their gas line if they did something beneficial for the city,” Ramsey added.

Asked why the City didn’t retain some form of ownership or have a council member sit on their board, he stated. “It would have been a grant and the City never entered into an agreement about the operations. It was an out and out grant.”

Executive Director in 2022 and Early 2023 Didn’t Speak with Anyone from City Either

Joel Roster was executive director for the theater until a month before the 2023 sale. When reached for comment and asked if he had spoken to anyone at the City before the sale, Roster said, “No, it certainly didn’t happen while I was there. I left, if I recall, in April, following the board’s decision to eliminate the education program. As things got tight the board’s first move was to do that, and I said, ‘I’m moving on’.”

“I was not in any talks about anything with the City,” he continued. “But if they could afford to do it, the best thing would be for the City to take it over.”

About his time as executive director, and specifically about his last year, Roster said, “We were doing really well, with the (COVID) PPE loans and the grants we were able to secure at that time changed everything.”

“It’s a big place to fill with such a limited staff and you need to get the marketing up to snuff,” he stated. “One of the best things they did was put Sharon as the president of the board. She’s great.”

“Everyone that was there and still there loves that place, deeply,” Roster added.

THE CITY’S SIDE of THE MATTER

Former Mayor Hernandez-Thorpe Says He Didn’t Speak with Anyone from Theatre Until After Sale

Former Mayor Lamar Hernandez-Thorpe was informed of Carraher’s comments and asked to provide his view of what happened and why the City did not take over the theater or partner with the foundation to keep it operating and out of private hands.

He responded with, “I only communicated with Joel during the time he served as Executive Director. My primary communication with him concerned the façade improvement program. I wanted him to work on a proposal because I believed the theater would have been an excellent candidate for that funding.”

“I did not learn about the sale of the theater until Kathie informed me, after Joel had arranged a meeting for the three of us. During that meeting, I expressed to both Kathie and Joel that, if another opportunity involving the sale of the theater arose in the future, I hoped they would keep the City in mind as a potential partner,” Hernandez-Thorpe explained.

“I was disappointed to learn that the theater had been sold to an owner from Oregon or Washington. When I learned the sale price, I was even more dismayed because I believed the City could have potentially purchased the theater, protected the property, and made the necessary improvements to transform it into a civic auditorium and/or public theater for the community. At the time we had a significant amount of unallocated ARPA funds which we could have used, along with healthy rainy-day funds (budget stabilization and reserves).” He was referring to the federal COVID-relief funds, from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

“After my meeting with Kathie and Joel, I informed Brad (Helfenberger), who was the Parks and Recreation Director at the time, about the sale. He was also surprised to learn that the theater had been sold,” the former mayor continued. “We discussed what a great opportunity it could have been for the City and the theater’s nonprofit organization to partner on something meaningful for the community.”

“However, all of those discussions were just that, conversations. Nothing formal resulted from them,” he added.

“What I can say with certainty is that, had I known the theater was for sale before it was sold, I would have brought the matter forward for consideration and advocated for the City to explore purchasing it. That would have been consistent with other efforts I championed as mayor, including pushing the City Council to pursue the development of a town square at the former Beede Lumber Yard and advocating for the restoration and reuse of the Mayor’s House as a City Hall annex,” Herandez-Thorpe explained, referring to the Hard House on W. First Street next to the Lynn House and across the street from the Amtrak Station.

“The theater represented the kind of opportunity I believed the City should explore, specifically, preserving an important community asset while creating a lasting public benefit,” he concluded.

Three of the Two Current, Two Former Councilmembers Say They Never Heard from Anyone at the Theater

Questions were also sent to current council members, Monica Wilson and Tamisha Torres-Walker, and former council members Lori Ogorchock and Mike Barbanica, all of whom were on the city council in 2023 before and after the theater was sold. They were asked if any of them had spoken with Carraher or any of the board members about the possible sale before it occurred and if any of them spoke with representatives of the theatre foundation, what was discussed and were any commitments made of City funds.

Barbanica said, “Absolutely not. That theater is something that is important to the city. That would have immediately been addressed. I used to go to movies there as a kid. It was part of the cruise. I grew up going to that theater. I would have immediately jumped on that and addressed it. The history of that theater is incredible. There’s no way we would have let that happen.”

Ogorchock said, “Nobody ever reached out to me from the board with a text, email or phone call. I was surprised it was sold. I had no clue it was up for sale.”

Regarding the 2023 sale Torres-Walker said, “I don’t remember any conversation, anything being brought to my attention, the council, nothing. Maybe they talked to somebody. But I’ve looked through all my emails about El Campanil and nothing dates back to then.”

“We still had the ARPA funds, and we could have used them to expand public services,” she stated. “If they had brought this to the council back then, for real, for real, I would have advocated we used those dollars.”

The only council member from that time to not yet respond is Wilson after several efforts to reach her and after she was given the opportunity to respond to the Herald’s questions by writing them in a post on her official Facebook page to inform the public. But as of publication time that had not yet occurred.

Former City Managers in 2022 and 2023

Cornelius “Con” Johnson was City Manager from Oct. 26, 2022, until March 17, 2023. Community Development Director Forrest Ebbs was then appointed Acting City Manager from March 17 until June 26, 2023, before leaving for a job in another city.

Kwame Reed was Economic Development Director in 2022 and 2023 and was appointed Acting City Manager on June 13, 2023, serving in the position until Oct. 2025. Carraher said, “I never had a conversation with Kwame Reed except when I was on the Economic Development Commission. He didn’t talk to me about the theater.”

Nevertheless, efforts were made to reach Reed to ask him what he knew about the 2023 sale. But this week, he was out of the office from his current position as Contra Costa’s Deputy County Clerk-Recorder, and he did not respond prior to publication time.

UPDATE 1 – 9/12/26: Reed Responds

Reed responded Saturday morning, Sept. 12 writing, “I do not recall being contacted by anyone regarding the theater at that time. Sorry I cannot provide you with any additional details.”

Former Acting City Manager Ebbs Does Not Remember Speaking with Anyone from the Theater, Says “Theaters Are Considered Public Use” and Treated Different Than Historic Homes

In response to questions about the 2023 sale Ebbs responded, “I wasn’t involved with the sale and unfortunately don’t have much to offer for your story.” 

When asked if he remembers meeting with anyone from the theater prior to the sale Ebbs said, “I don’t. I keep racking my brain. I don’t even remember being aware of it. It wouldn’t have come to the City without us being on title. The theater would have had to approach us voluntarily.”

“There should have been a lien against the property,” he continued.

Ebbs then shared examples of other cities with old theaters.

“The City of Tracy owns a historic theater, and they have a foundation and are very hands on,” he stated. “The City of Monterey has one and it’s privately owned but restored with private dollars. They eventually leased it to a church and they were concerned. As a City they stepped in to say they have to allow its use by others.”

“For historic preservation, the interior, the City can have a say,” Ebbs explained. “There are strings attached to that if its federal dollars. Theaters are considered public use. They’re treated different than privately owned historic homes.”

Former City Manager Johnson Says He Didn’t Speak with Anyone from the Theater Prior to Sale

Johnson was asked via email, “since you were city manager from Oct. 26, 2022, until March 17, 2023, and the sale of the El Campanil Theatre occurred in May 2023, prior to the sale, did you remember ever speaking with Rick Carraher, who was on the theatre foundation’s board at the time, or Mike Ramsey, the board president in 2022 and possibly part of 2023, or anyone else from the theater about the City taking it over, to form some kind of partnership or providing funds to prevent a private-party sale?”

“I know for a fact that they didn’t speak to anyone in my office or on my team,” he continued. “That was never an issue for discussion by the city council or the city manager’s office. Any agreement between the city and a private party needs to be vetted by the city council and I know during my tenure, nothing was brought to the city council.”

When informed Carraher said there weren’t any formal discussions Johnson stated, “That doesn’t matter. That’s not official. Anyone can say anything.”

Asked if he was the city manager who Carraher was introduced to Johnson stated, “It wasn’t me. I never heard of anything about the theater. Lamar never introduced me to the director or who you’re referring to.”

To which city manager Carraher was referring Johnson asked, “Was he Black or White?”

When Carraher was asked about the skin color of the city manager to whom Hernandez-Thorpe introduced him in front of the theater prior to the sale, he said, “I believe, Black.” Based on what Carraher said about Reed and who were the city managers during that time, he had to be referring to Johnson.

Questions for Current City Staff, Council Members

Emails were sent to staff, beginning Aug. 28 and to council members last Friday, informing them of “The minutes for Agenda Item 5 of the Antioch City Council’s meeting on Dec. 16, 2023, when the council voted 4-0 to give $750,000 in redevelopment funds to the El Campanil Theatre Preservation Foundation” including Carraher’s commitment.

They were then asked the following questions: “Although, according to the minutes, nothing was included in the motion voted on by the council, which passed 4-0, mentioning the transfer of the building to the City, was that commitment by Mr. Carraher binding? Or was it included in the agreement between the City, the theater foundation and Calpine Corporation, which donated $500,000 to the foundation for purchase of the building? Have you yet been able to locate that agreement from 2003? It’s mentioned on the History page of the theater’s website – www.elcampaniltheatre.com/about-us/the-history”

They were then informed, “what is written on that page only includes an agreement between Calpine and the City, and the foundation was not party to it.”

They were then asked, “whether there was any clause requiring a first-right-of-refusal purchase by the City if the foundation board ever decided to sell it? Or was there anything else in that agreement that gave some kind of rights to the City since $750,000 of redevelopment funds were used for the building’s renovation after it was purchased?”

Staff and Freitas, because he was mayor at the time, were also asked if direction from council was given to staff during the 2003 meeting to create an agreement or some kind of document with the additional language of ‘conditions on the property’ as former Councilman Simonsen mentioned.

City Attorney Responds, Finds Some Documents, Office Still Looking for More

Through email and in a phone call with City Attorney Asuncion, she said Tuesday, she had found the staff report for the 2003 agenda item mentioned above and a document mentioning the 2001 foundation board vote. See ECT Preservation Foundation’s 2003 Request to Council

“There is an old document from January 2009,” Asuncion continued. “A staff report showing a guarantee of the loan for the HVAC system replacement. A letter from Rick addressed to Mayor James Davis and council, that on March 9, 2001, the board of the ECT passed something that gave the City the first-right-of-refusal. That’s all I have is that letter attached to the staff report.” See 2009 council meeting document.

Tuesday evening before this week’s council meeting, Asuncion provided the documents via email writing, “Pursuant to our conversation earlier today, attached please find a copy of the December 16, 2003, staff report related to the El Campanil where council provided funding for ‘essential equipment and improvements for renovations.’ I am also attaching a staff report for the January 2009 loan guarantee which is the only document I’ve been provided so far that evidences this action.”

In addition, the City now has copies of the deeds including the 2009 deed regarding the HVAC loan, Asuncion shared.

But she hasn’t “seen anything that documents the (deed) restriction.”

Asked if she or her staff had found the 2003 agreement between Calpine and the City, Asuncion said, “I’m still digging around, as well.”

Theatre’s Finances

In a partial response to questions from the public asking, “what happened to the money” the foundation’s 2021-24 tax returns are available on the candid.org website. They show revenue increasing from 2020 through 2022, then sharp decreases in both 2023 and 2024, to just above the level during the first year of COVID when the theater was closed.

The 2021 return shows 2020 total net revenue of $361,299 of which $362,929 was from “Contributions and grants” and total expenses of $313,278 of which $194,059 was for “Salaries, other compensation and employee benefits” and “Other expenses” of $119,219.

It also shows 2021 total revenue increasing to $561,634 and total expenses also increasing to $453,368 of which $265,702 was for employee costs and $187,666 for other expenses including just $896 for fundraising. That resulted in net revenue of $48,021.

The 2022 return shows a significant increase in total revenue to $902,682 of which $402,874 was from donations, and total expenses of $927,073 which included $655,940 for employee costs and $123,432 for fundraising expenses. The theater also ended that year in the black with net revenue of $78,266.

The 2023 return shows total revenue decreased by over $300,000 to $585,573 of which $174,462 from donations. Expenses included $419,508 spent on employees and $267,391 spent on other expenses including only $5,000 on fundraising, for a total of $686,899 resulting in a loss of $101,326.

In 2024, total revenue decreased again by almost $200,000 to $391,222 of which $313,022 was spent on employee costs and $247,295 was spent on other expenses for a total of $560,317 including $28,830 for fundraising resulting in another loss of $169,095.

The “Net assets or fund balance” has continued to decrease since 2022 from a high of $1,099,233 at the beginning of that year to $827,818 at the end of the year, then down to $610,153 at the end of 2022, $460,133 at the end of 2023 and finally, down to $275,972 at the end of 2024.

Asked about the “Secured mortgages and notes payable to unrelated third parties”? mentioned in the tax returns, Carraher said, “The loan was about $300,000 for replacing the HVAC system.” The City’s loan guarantee was for up to $285,000.

The tax returns show at the beginning of 2023 a loan balance of $198,228 and by the end of that year the balance was zero. That’s because the loan was paid off from the sale of the theater, Carraher shared.

“That was one of the big debts that caused us to say we’re going out of business,” he explained who also shared the HVAC system was replaced by Antioch-based Fertado Heating & Air Company.

More About the Current Board President and This Year’s Sale

Regarding this year’s sale, additional questions were sent to Sobel Idul last Saturday, asking if she had a position with the theater, other than The Nutcracker performances, before becoming board president, did she serve on the board and was she in charge of marketing before becoming president. But Sobel Idul has not yet responded to those questions as of publication time. As previously reported, “The Nutcracker” is a production of the Pittsburg-based Black Diamond Ballet Company, owned by Sobel Idul.

However, Carraher shared, “Sharon had been on the board once before and she was the biggest renter the theater had. ‘The Nutcracker’ was the greatest funder. She came in and has been doing the marketing. All the social media. She’s a wiz. Then Sharon joined the board while Kathie was still president.”

In response to Sobel Idul’s comments published in a previous article last Friday, Downtown Antioch Association leader and Rivertown business owner, Debbie Blaisure shared that in a podcast last year, with Mike Burkholder of ContraCosta.news published July 15, 2025, Campbell said, “the El Campanil Theatre was in serious financial problems and Sharon knew it. She said Sharon got mad at her and got all the board and employees mad at her as well about it and stormed into the board meeting after she did it. Kathie nominated her for president and left a few weeks later. Sharon was one of their biggest customers with ‘The Nutcracker’ and the Board asked her to assist with marketing then the board. That’s how she got involved with the foundation.”

“When I talked to her (Sharon) and Josh in front of my shop after giving them our $3,000 check, she was in charge of the marketing and Josh does remember it and that she only wanted to advertise the $50k fundraiser and not the full amount they needed,” Blaisure continued. “My statement stands. I don’t think we need to correct it as misinformation.” She was referring to the theater’s then-executive director, Joshua Price.

For Now, Carraher Offered Final Say

“I’m giving you my best recollection. There was no one that was closer to this than me,” Carraher stated after being informed of the comments from the others from the theater, council members and former City staff. “I would have never, ever undertaken the sale if I hadn’t spoken to the City first, as a courtesy if nothing else, especially since they were the guarantors on the HVAC loan.”

Public Must Pressure Wilson to Provide Answers

Until Wilson provides answers to the questions posed to her to inform the public if someone from the theater spoke to her, when and what was said and or committed, the public will have to wait to determine if she knew what actually transpired in 2022 and 2023 prior to the first sale of the theater to a private party.

It’s now up to the public to pressure Wilson, who is still in office and running for re-election, to either respond to the Herald, issue a statement or press release to all local media or post her answers publicly on own social media to clarify matters. It’s the age-old questions asked of government officials: “What did you know and when did you know it?”

Please check back later for any additional updates to this report.