Archive for the ‘Politics & Elections’ Category

June Primary Elections Feature Many Candidates, Few Ballot Measures

Monday, June 4th, 2012

Following is the information that candidates provided to SmartVoter.org, a project of the League of Women Voters, and gathered from the internet.

The June Primary will be the first time that Proposition 14 will be in effect, statewide, allowing any voter to vote for any candidate. Plus only the top two candidates in each race will run against each other in the General Election in November.

First is their name, then their party affiliation followed by their ballot designation and occupation and contact information.

All campaigns were contacted and offered the opportunity to advertise with us.

Local Elections – with the Antioch Herald’s Recommendations

Three Measures in Antioch will Change from Electing to Appointing Mayor, City Clerk and City Treasurer, and for Antioch High Improvements

Measure J – Antioch School Bonds – No recommendation

55% approval required

www.antioch.k12.ca.us/MeasureJ

Measure L – Change City Clerk and Treasurer to Appointed – NO

Majority approval required

Measure M – Change Elected Mayor to Appointed – YES

Majority approval required

 

 

Federal Elections

Two Challengers for McNerney in New District

 

Gerald “Jerry” McNerney

Democratic

United States Congressman/Engineer

info@jerrymcnerney.org

209-910-4172

www.JerryMcNerney.org

Ranjit “Ricky” Gill

Republican

Law School Student/Small Businessman/Farmer

info@rickygill.com

209-222-8208

www.RickyGill.com

John McDonald

Republican

High Technology Executive

john@johnmcdonald2012.com

209-229-5224

www.JohnMcDonald2012.com

 

Two Democrats, One Republican Challenge Miller in Reelection Bid

 

John Fitzgerald

Democratic

Contractor

925-383-9927

www.JohnFitzgeraldforCongress.com

Cheryl Sudduth

Democratic

Contracts Compliance Director

www.CherylSudduth.com

George Miller

Democratic

Congressman

dave@georgemillerforcongress.com

925-948-5165

www.GeorgeMillerforCongress.com

Virginia Fuller

Republican

Registered Nurse

vf@fullerforcongress.org

510-758-5854

www.FullerforCongress.org

 

23 Candidates Run to Challenge Dianne Feinstein for U.S. Senate

 

Dianne Feinstein

Democratic

United States Senator

202-224-9650

www.DianneFeinstein2012.com

Elizabeth Emken

Republican

Businesswoman/Nonprofit Executive

elizabeth@emken2012.com

925-395-4475

www.Emken2012.com

Al Ramirez

Republican

Businessman

2012@alramirez.com

Phone:202-455-0560

www.AlRamirez.com

Orly Taitz

Republican

Doctor/Attorney/Businesswoman

dr_taitz@yahoo.com

www.OrlyTaitzforUSSenate2012.com

John Boruff

Republican

Businessman

john@johnboruff.com

858-215-4872

www.JohnBoruff.com

Robert Lauten

Republican

info@robertlautenforussenate2012.com

714-202-2625

RobertLautenforUSSenate2012.com

Colleen Shea Fernald

Democratic

Mother/Consultant/Artist

infinite_c@yahoo.com

707-829-2243

www.CampaignforPeace.org

Marsha Feinland

Peace and Freedom

Retired Teacher

feinlandforsenate@gmail.com

510-845-4360

www.FeinlandforSenate.org

Dirk Allen Konopik

Republican

MBA Student

campaign@konopikforca2012.com

909-293-9225

www.KonopikforCA2012.com

Kabiruddin Karim Ali

Peace and Freedom

Businessman

business.hotels@yahoo.com

818-257-2743

www.Twitter.com/AliKabir786

Nachum Shifren

Republican

Educator/Author/Businessman

rabbi.shifren@gmail.com

rns.nationbuilder.com

Rogelio T. Gloria

Republican

Graduate Student/Businessman

r.gloria40@gmail.com

Phone:619-267-5334

gloriaforcongress.weebly.com

David Alex Levitt

Democratic

Computer Scientist/Engineer

david@levitt2012.org

Phone:707-515-7828

www.Levitt2012.org

Nak Shah

Democratic

Environmental Health Consultant

nickshah34@yahoo.com

Phone:224-622-2573

Nakshar.webstarts.com

Donald Krampe

Republican

Retired Administration Director

krampeforsenate@gmail.com

www.KrampeforSenate.com

Oscar Alejandro Braun

Republican

Businessman/Rancher

WaterForFighting@gmail.com

650-867-5779

www.OscarforUSSenate.com

Mike Strimling

Democratic

Occupation: Consumer Rights Attorney

ms@taxtherich2012.org

510-325-7722

www.TaxTheRich2012.org

Dennis Jackson

Republican

Aerospace General Manager

jacksonussenate@gmail.com

951-734-4823

www.JacksonUSSenate.com

Diane Stewart

Democratic

Businesswoman/Finance Manager

diane@dianestewart4us.org

Discovery Bay resident

510-705-2078

www.DianeStewart4Us.org

Rick Williams

Republican

Business Attorney

rickwilliamsforsenate@aol.com

www.RickWilliamsforSenate.com

Greg Conlon

Republican

Businessman/CPA

gregconlonforsenate@yahoo.com

650-315-4956

www.GregConlon.com

Gail K. Lightfoot

Libertarian

Retired Nurse

sosvotelp@aol.com

www.GailKLightfoot.com

Don J. Grundmann

American Independent

Doctor of Chiropractic

stoptheirs@hotmail.com

510-895-6789

www.TruthUSA.org

Dan Hughes

Republican

Small Business Owner

john@pacificpolitical.com

760-260-4511

www.DanHughes2012.org

 

State Elections

Six Vie for New, Open Assembly Seat

 

Patricia Hernández

Democratic

Chief Negotiator

phernandez11th@gmail.com

707-718-6632

www.PHernandez.com

Jim Frazier

Democratic

Oakley Councilmember/Business Owner

925-250-6831

jimfrazier@jimfrazierforassembly.com

www.JimFrazierforAssembly.com

Len Augustine

No Party Preference

Retired USAF Colonel

lenaug@pacbell.net

707-446-0986

www.LenAugustine.com

Charles Kingeter

Democratic

Programmer/Artist

charleskingeter@gmail.com

707-422-4695

Mike Hudson

Republican

Vice-Mayor of Suisun City/Business Owner

mike@mikehudson2012.com

707-372-8389

www.MikeHudson2012.com

Gene Gantt

Democratic

Retired Fire Chief

genegantt@comcast.net

707-590-3446

www.GeneGantt.com

 

 

DeSaulnier Faces Opposition in Re-election Bid for Final Term as State Senator

 

Mark P. Meuser

Republican

Counselor at Law

mpm@markmeuser.com

Phone:415-577-2850

www.MarkMeuser.com

Mark DeSaulnier

Democratic

State Senator/Businessman

mark@markdesaulnier.com

925-957-1123

www.MarkDeSaulnier.com

Two State Propositions on Ballot – One to Change Term Limits, the Other to Increase Tobacco Tax

Proposition 28
Contact FOR Proposition 28:
Doug Herman Californians for a Fresh Start
790 E. Colorado Blvd., Ste 506 Pasadena, 91101 (626) 535-0710
info@cafreshstart.com
www.cafreshstart.com
Contact AGAINST Proposition 28:
Anita Anderson Californians for Term Limits
1161 Rhode Island Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
(415) 309-0939
info@28no.org
www.28No.org
Proposition 29
Contact FOR Proposition 29:
Tim Gibbs American Cancer Society
980 9th Street, Suite 2550
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 397-4618
Info@CaliforniansForACure.org
www.CaliforniansForACure.org
Contact AGAINST Proposition 29:
No on 29—Californians Against Out-of-Control Taxes and Spending, a coalition of taxpayers, small businesses, law enforcement and labor
(866) 662-7016
Info@NoOn29.com
www.NoOn29.com

Clean Water Initiative Fails by Almost 60% to 40%

Friday, May 18th, 2012

By Allen Payton, Publisher

Below is the email sent out detailing the results of the recent election for the Clean Water Initiative, in which property owners could cast their vote and mail-in their ballots.

The entire process cost approximately $1.43 million, the largest portion of which was $444,092.40 spent on campaigning, labeled as “educational outreach” by county staff, as well as $346,800 on printing and mailing the ballots. Almost $435,000 was spent on analysis, research, the Engineer’s Report and action plan prior to the election.

The result is each city, the county and the County Flood Control District will have to determine how to pay for the requirements for complying with the new clean water regulations.

From: Don Freitas

To:

Contra County County Board of Supervisors

City/Town Mayors

City/Town Councilmembers

City/Town Managers

Contra Costa Clean Water Program Management Committee Members & Alternates

Cities/County Attorneys’ Association Ad Hoc Committee

Cities/County Engineering Advisory Committee

SCI Consulting Group, Inc. and sub-consultants

Media

Dear Interested Parties:

The purpose of this email is to inform you of the final election results for the “2012 Community Clean Water Initiative”. Contrary to recent press articles, Monday, May 7th has always been designated as the deadline to receive this information. Passage of the Initiative required fifty percent (50%) plus one of those casting a vote which included all property owners in Contra Costa County. The results are as follows:

Mailed Ballots                –  339,586

Received Valid Ballots  –  100,768

“Yes” Ballots   –     40,924

“No”  Ballots    –    59,844

Invalid Ballots                 –       1,355

Based on the aforementioned results, the Initiative failed by approximately a 60% to a 40% margin. As was stated many times during this process,  the defeat of the Initiative does NOT negate the need for all twenty-one affected jurisdictions in Contra Costa County from the regulatory mandates of the Federal Clean Water Act and California’s Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act. Each entity needs to immediately determine how the necessary funding will now be generated in order to implement the regulatory mandates or be found to be in noncompliance and subject to fines which could run into the thousands or millions of dollars.

The election results can and will be interpreted in many ways, but suffice it to say, the methodology outlined in the voter approved 1996 Proposition 218 ( California Constitution XIII ) had great challenges even though the Program followed its provisions religiously. Courts in California have said the legal nexus between urban runoff and property is valid, but the requirements of Proposition 218 became suspect in the voter’s mind and the press. It’s very easy for the press to condemn actions of local government; but rarely if ever, do they suggest valid alternatives. The election result has worsened local government’s ability to finance Federal and/or State mandates when it is done with no local financing. If the general fund becomes the only alternative to finance the regulatory mandates than the public debate will be simplified between “clean water vs. hiring police officers and other vital community services.”

Donald P. Freitas

Project Manager

Contra Costa Clean Water Program

 

Antioch School Board Votes Against Clean Water Tax

Thursday, March 29th, 2012

On a 4-1 vote the Antioch School Board decided to not support the 2012 Clean Water Initiative at their meeting on Wednesday, March 28, 2012.  Trustees Diane Gibson-Gray, Gary Hack, Walter Ruehlig and Claire Smith voted no and Trustee Joy Motts gave the sole affirmative vote.

If passed will place a $12 per year assessment on property tax bills in Antioch. Cynthia Ruehlig, speaking as a citizen, gave public comment claiming that the entire county was being asked to pick up the burden for a few cities that suffer inadequate sewage release during heavy downpours.

School official Tim Forrester disturbingly reported that four A.U.S.D. parcel bills were not yet found but that the total bill for the entire District would probably be in the vicinity of $34,000 a year. Mrs. Ruehlig, a member of the County Board of Education which also voted against the initiative, questioned whether that money might not, in fact, be spent better on education for our children, especially as the current annual 14 million clean water fee budgeting was not fully explained, let alone the new request for an $8 million annual increase.

Board trustees also questioned the murky process of the vote. They were puzzled as to why this was called a fee and not a tax;  why it was not a ballot measure with an opposition statement but instead a mail-in vote that had a slick campaign brochure and a $2 million dollar cost; why foreigners could vote for it; and why the votes were not counted by the County Election Board, but a private firm.
The fee will generate an estimated $8.7 million per year, if the initiative passes. Voters have until April 6, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. to have their ballots received in order to be counted.

Serious Problems with Proposed Clean Water Tax and Election

Saturday, March 24th, 2012

There are some serious problems with the proposed Clean Water tax (they call it a fee, but any time government takes our money it’s a tax) and the election being run to get it passed.

First, the election ballots have the property owners name on them, so it’s not a secret ballot. Those compiling the results of the election get to know how someone voted. That goes against the American way of elections.

Second, foreigners can vote. Since it’s a Proposition 218 election, in which only property owners get to vote – which I don’t have a problem with, since they’re the ones who will be paying the additional “fee” included in their property tax bill. But, many properties in California are owned by foreigners and/or foreign companies. That means they get to vote. That’s not the American way of elections, either!

Third, the campaign being waged to pass the tax is being run by the county’s Clean Water Program, and the mailings to promote it are funded by our tax dollars! Tax-dollar funded campaigning to pass another tax? Really? The craziest part – although to be fair, Clean Water Program Manager Don Freitas stated it was a mistake by a staffer at the company that was hired to print and mail the campaign material – the first mailing hit the homes on the day of the vote by the county Board of Supervisors, when they decided whether or not to allow the vote to go forward. (The election was going to happen anyway, since there wasn’t enough protest votes to stop it).

Fourth, ballots will be counted by a certified public accounting firm, Carol Keane & Associates, based in Walnut Creek and not the County Elections Division of the County Clerk’s Office. So, how can there be any accountability or public oversight when the ballots are counted, like other elections?

Fifth, and the most important part, is the tax really necessary? While if it passes, it will generate about $8 million a year, that’ s only a third of the estimated $25 million a year that’s claimed to be needed to clean up the water ways in the county. While I agree there’s a need, since it’s such a high priority, why doesn’t the county budget for the entire $25 million in their budget of $1.2 billion?

With all the flaws in this election this proposed tax should be rejected and the Board of Supervisors should just reprioritize their spending for 2012-13 and include the $25 million cost for the clean water program in next year’s budget when they adopt it in June.  Your ballot must be received by 5:00 p.m. on April 6, 2012, which means you need to mail it a few days before.

In addition, it’s clear some new state legislation is needed to clean up the Proposition 218 election ballot process, eliminating the name on the ballot of the voter to keep it a secret ballot and eliminate the right of foreign property owners from voting in American elections.

Allen Payton, Publisher

P.S. Just got this additional problem from a reader –  “Another problem is that the list of property owners is not current and I have personal knowledge of a property foreclosed last January and the ballot was still sent to the foreclosed property owner.” So, now some renter or renter can vote that ballot and mail it in.

County School Board Votes Against Clean Water Tax

Saturday, March 24th, 2012

By Walter Ruehlig

After a lively discussion at the March 21 meeting of the Contra Costa County Board of Education, the board voted against supporting the 2012 Clean Water Initiative. Board President Cynthia Ruehlig, a vocal critic of the proposed tax, and Trustees Richard Asadoorian and Daniel Gomes voted no, while Trustee Pam Mirabella voted to abstain. Trustee Ellen Elster was absent.

If it passes, the parcel tax for the County Office of Education is estimated at $2,000 per year. The three ballots received for facilities owned by the Office of Education located in Pleasant Hill, Brentwood and Concord will all be marked “no”. Ballots for the county-wide mail-in Proposition 218 election must be received by 5:00 p.m., April 6, 2012.

One interesting aspect of the election is that the process is being conducted and monitored by a private organization, Carol Keane and Associates a certified public accounting firm located in Walnut Creek, and not by the County Clerk’s Election Division.

Congressional Candidate Ricky Gill a ‘Contender’

Sunday, February 12th, 2012

The National Republican Congressional Committee today named Ricky Gill a “Contender” candidate, the third of four stages in its selective “Young Guns” election program. Gill is one of only 11 candidates nationwide who has achieved “Contender” status.

Advancing to “Contender” status required Gill to meet a rigorous set of fundraising and organizational benchmarks that demonstrate he is “on the road to victory,” according to the NRCC. To date, Gill has raised more than $1 million and has earned endorsements from leading national figures including South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, and former San Joaquin Valley Congressman Norman D. Shumway.

“Ricky Gill continues to prove himself by meeting these latest benchmarks in the ‘Young Guns’ program,” said NRCC Chairman Pete Sessions (R-TX). “Ricky’s dedication and experience enables him to advocate effectively for pro-growth policies and fight the failed Democrat status quo in Washington. This will stand in stark contrast to the Democrats’ record of spending, borrowing and taxing that California families and small businesses know has failed.”

Gill is challenging Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton), a three-term incumbent who lives in the Bay Area, well outside the Valley and Delta communities of the 9th Congressional District.

Ricky Gill is a native of San Joaquin County, born and raised in Lodi, California. The son of immigrant parents, Ricky is a small business owner, a family farmer, and a former member of the California State Board of Education whose story speaks to the power of the American dream. Ricky grew up helping manage his family’s vineyard operation and serving the community as chair of the Greater Lodi Area Youth Commission. He has played an integral role in his family’s small business, which employs 60 people in the San Joaquin Valley, for several years. In 2004, he was appointed by the Governor to the California State Board of Education, where he served as the sole representative of more than six million public school students. He subsequently served as an adviser to the California Secretary of Education. Ricky now serves as a member of the Lodi Boys & Girls Club Board of Directors. A Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Princeton University, he will soon complete his Juris Doctor at the University of California, Berkeley.
www.RickyGill.com

DA to Speak at Supervisor Glover’s breakfast

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

District Attorney Mark Peterson will be the guest speaker at Supervisor Federal Glover’s breakfast on Feb. 10. One of the topics he will speak about is his program to fight habitual truancy among school-age children.

Peterson has made fighting truancy one of his cornerstones of his office since he was elected district attorney. Last month, the DA’s Office filed charges against a pair of Rodeo parents because their children missed too many classes. It is the first time in county history that parents are facing charges for their children’s truancy.

“Our goal is to get these kids back in school and get parents to take responsibility for making that happen,” said Peterson.

Since he took office, Peterson has been laying down the groundwork for this program by working with local school districts and law enforcement agencies. He formally unveiled the truancy program in early 2011 to a meeting of the East County Gang Task Force formed by Glover.

The breakfast will be held at the Martinez Event Center, 536 Main St., Martinez and will
start at 7:30 a.m.

“The Breakfast Club was formed as another way of communicating with constituents,” said Glover. “It also serves as a fundraiser for office holder (non-campaign) expenses so that my staff and I can continue our outreach efforts, cover costs for attending informational seminars and workshops, and pay for other office-related expenses not routinely covered by the general fund.”

The breakfasts feature speakers who are usually local, state or federal officials as well as experts in particular fields. The popular events are held quarterly. Individuals who wish to be members and received advance details about upcoming events can pay for the entire year. Nonmembers can also attend and pay $50 per breakfast or $25 if you are a senior citizen or a student.

For more information about the Breakfast Club, call 925-202-5001. Checks can be made payable to Federal D. Glover Officeholder Account ID# 12-44440.

EAST CONTRA COSTA REPUBLICAN WOMEN Meeting

Friday, January 27th, 2012

EAST CONTRA COSTA REPUBLICAN WOMEN FEDERATED WILL MEET ON THURSDAY, FEBUARY 9, 2012, 11:30 A.M. AT VIC STEWART’S, 2270 BALFOUR ROAD, BRENTWOOD. Speaker: Brad Dacus, President, Pacific Justice Institute. GUESTS WELCOME. COST $20. FOR RESERVATIONS AND MENU: (925) 634-5404.