Archive for the ‘News’ Category

Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre-arranged

Sunday, March 1st, 2015

Mystery man, powerful interests manipulate which candidates would run, clears field for possible Glazer win, Marine veteran Republican candidate lied to

Glazer Hertle photo 300x157 Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre arranged

Steve Glazer and Michaela Hertle from Glazer’s campaign website.

By Allen Payton

After last minute maneuvering among potential Republican candidates on the filing deadline of Friday, January 23, 2015 only one completed the process, to make it onto the ballot for the special State Senate election in District 7 on March 17. Then, a little more than a week later, Michaela Hertle, the young, unknown, first-time candidate dropped out of the race, on Monday, February 2 and endorsed Democrat Steve Glazer, the Mayor of Orinda, and unsuccessful 2014 State Assembly candidate.

While it may come as a surprise to some, others expected it to happen.

Republican insiders were saying, before the close of filing, that there was an effort to make sure no Republican candidates ran so that Glazer could win.

The only Republican candidate who had announced prior to January 23rd, was attorney Mark Meuser, who had run unsuccessfully for the 7th State Senate seat against, then-incumbent, Mark DeSaulnier, in 2012. It’s due to DeSaulnier’s election to Congress, last year, that Governor Brown called the special election to fill the remainder of his term, through 2016.

There had been pressure on Meuser to back out so that another candidate, that Republican Party leaders believed could have a better chance of winning, could run.

Meuser was told that if he ran, two other Republicans would run against him to split the vote. But, he wouldn’t back down.

Under California’s Open Primary law the top two candidates in the primary face off in the General Election, regardless of party.

Meuser’s strategy was to have only one Republican in the race – him. The State Senate Republican Caucus strategy was to have two Republicans in the race, both of whom would have to win in the Primary to have one win in the General.

So, with too many Republicans in the race, there was less chance for one of them to win.

In the final two days, Meuser was faced what he’d been warned about, as three other Republicans pulled filing papers to run. Hertle and small business owner Fernando Navarro of Antioch pulled papers on Thursday, January 22 and Leigh Wolf, a 28-year-old Marine veteran, pulled papers on Friday, January 23, the latter two in Contra Costa.

Hertle ended up being the only Republican to file.

Three other Democrats had already filed, including current State Assemblywoman Susan Bonilla and former Assemblywoman Joan Buchanan, who termed out, last year, and Dr. Terry Kremin, a two-time unsuccessful Concord City Council candidate.

Meuser pressured to not run by “Third House,”

Meuser was asked to go to Sacramento to meet with key pro-business campaign finance sources, part of what is described as the “Third House” of the legislature, in addition to the Assembly and Senate. It includes the political action committees and lobbyists with the money for direct contributions and independent expenditure efforts to support a candidate or ballot measure. They aren’t committed to a political party just the candidates and issues that benefit their interests.

I was sitting across the table from representatives of the California Chamber of Commerce and another group, both of whom said they had chairs at the table of the Jobs PAC,” Meuser said.

They had done a $30,000 survey of the district and wanted to share with Meuser his numbers. But, the survey wasn’t about Meuser it was about Glazer. Only a couple questions were about Meuser. They told him that Meuser couldn’t win at all and that Glazer couldn’t win and wouldn’t run if Meuser was in the race.

However, they said if you get out of the race and Steve Glazer gets in, he can win,” Meuser said. “Two days after that I started hearing from various legislators that the pro-business side of the Third House was going to spend money against me.”

Following that meeting, five different people tried to talk him out of the race and said they would back him for another office, Meuser shared.

Hertle files in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties

While Hertle was at the Alameda County Registrar of Voters office, Hugh Bussell, who ran for Congress in District 15 against Congressman Eric Swalwell, last year, was the one who dropped off her paperwork in Contra Costa on the day of filing. He was there when Wolf, his people, Meuser and Glazer were there.

Until the Tuesday before the filing, he was the Vice Chair of the Alameda County Republican Party, ran for County Party Chair, but lost. He’s still a member of the party’s Central Committee in that county.

When asked if he knew who paid Hertle’s filing fee, he responded, “My role was very minor. I was sort of a messenger. I didn’t see all the other paperwork. I was just asked to bring the signatures to Contra Costa.”

She is the one who asked for his help, knowing he understood the process from when he ran, previously, Bussell shared.

There was no check in the paperwork that he had, because Hertle filed in Alameda County and paid her fees, there.

When asked about the effort to clear the field of Republican candidates Bussel said, “Hertle actually spoke about that last night at the Alameda County Republican Party meeting.” But, he wouldn’t elaborate, as it was a private meeting and recording is not allowed.

She’s a liar. I really don’t believe her.”

Kevin McGary, President of the Frederick Douglas Society said he was in attendance at the meeting where Hertle spoke.

She said she always wanted to run. She decided to run on a whim,” he stated. “Hertle said that no one influenced her. No one talked her into it.”

McGary then got up and spoke for about five minutes, lambasting Hertle.

I thought she was about to have tears come to her eyes,” he said. “She’s a liar. I really don’t believe her. She was probably coached to deny, deny, deny.”

Believing her is “too high of a hurdle to get over,” McGary added.

He went on to speak about candidates like Hertle.

They have little to no foundation. No understanding of Republican principles,” he stated emphatically. “This is not a trivial exercise to put your feet in the water and screw up everything for other Republican candidates. We need to know they’re in it to win it.”

State Republican Party Chair spoke with Meuser on filing deadline

California Republican Party Chairman and former State Senator Jim Brulte when reached for comment said “I make it a policy not to talk to the press. I let the candidates and campaigns do that.” However, he did confirm that he spoke with Meuser the morning of the filing deadline, who had indicated to Brulte that he was going to run. “Then he didn’t,” Brulte added.

Two-tour Afghanistan former Marine recruited

Wolf, the retired Marine, who has been back from Afghanistan about a year, was a more moderate alternative to Meuser and was one of the candidates with whom staff from the Senate Republican Caucus had been in contact.

The word was that Wolf would be the one getting the endorsement from the California Republican Party, which would help give his campaign legitimacy, making it easier to raise funds. Some Party activists came down from Sacramento to help the fledgling Wolf campaign.

A “very seasoned operative in the East Bay,” as Wolf’s team described him, started reaching out to donors and he found money to pay Wolf’s filing fee. He was the middle man.

A witness said that Wolf and about 10 volunteers arrived at the County Clerk’s Office in Martinez to file his candidacy papers at about 4:00 p.m. on the deadline day.

Hispanic candidate from Antioch calls it a coup d’état, may still run

The fourth Republican candidate to pull papers was Fernando Navarro of Antioch.

When reached for comment and asked if he was part of the effort to clear the field of Republicans, Navarro responded, “I’m a run of the mill Republican that saw an opening and got an inkling to put up or shut up, take on your constitutional responsibility, put down the tools of your trade and go run.”

So, he went down to the county elections office on Thursday, January 22, pulled papers and began gathering signatures.

Once Navarro had done so, he got a call from Ruben Barrales, a former Deputy Assistant to President George W. Bush and the former Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs, who lives in San Diego.

He called me out of the blue,” Navarro shared. “He told me that he noticed that I pulled papers and my name rang a bell, so he called me.”

Ruben Barrales and I go way back before his White House days,” Navarro said. “I met him when I lived in East Palo Alto, when he was a San Mateo County Supervisor.”

Ruben was my contact in the White House, when I was working on the immigration issue in 2006. He’s now working with Republican Hispanic candidates,” Navarro explained.

It was funny. I had a former Presidential Cabinet member running with me through Antioch neighborhoods collecting signatures,” he said with a laugh. “I really appreciated it.”

We were out getting signatures,” Navarro said. “Then I got an email from my friend Mandy Morello, [a Republican Party activist from Sacramento], who let me know Mark was running. I didn’t want to be a stumbling block. Ruben suggested I not run. So I didn’t file.”

About Hertle, he said “she was a Democrat in Republican clothing.”

Some people played some dirty pool to clear the field,” he stated. “It was a coup d’état.”

This is one of the most conservative counties in the Bay Area. To know that they cleared the field of Republicans in this race boils my blood like you don’t know what,” he added.

Now Navarro is thinking about a bid as a write-in candidate.

I’m seriously considering running a write-in campaign and I wouldn’t be running just to run. I have serious issues I will talk about,” Navarro stated. “We need to show them we’re not just going to roll over.”

Candidates in last-minute stand-off

On the day of filing, Meuser was at the County Elections Office, sitting in his car. So was Glazer. According to a witness, Glazer had a guy there on the phone, appearing to be watching and waiting to see what Wolf and Meuser were going to do.

When Wolf showed up, Glazer got out of his car and went in and filed his papers.

So, a stand-off ensued between Meuser, Wolf and Hertle, who was in Alameda County.

Meuser told Wolf if Wolf filed he wasn’t going to since he thought that only one Republican candidate should run so a Republican could win. At about 4:45 p.m. Wolf’s team got word that the Alameda County candidate had filed, so they decided Wolf would file.

Hertle made it. She was part of the plan. With only one Republican in the race, then the plan could be achieved, when she backed out and threw her support to Glazer.

However, the real plan was that no Republican would file. But, because Meuser was standing at the counter at 5:00 p.m., someone informed Hertle that she had to file her paperwork in Alameda County. Which she did.

No Contra Costa Republican files, Wolf’s team lied to

Right at 5:00 p.m. Meuser was working with the county elections staff to complete his paperwork, including his ballot statement. They were also dealing with Wolf’s paperwork.

As long as a candidate had started their paperwork by 5:00 p.m., they were fine to complete the process after the deadline.

Since it appeared there would be two other Republican candidates in the race, Meuser chose not to file.

Meuser told Wolf, “fine, I’m not,” gave Wolf his business card and offered his campaign headquarters for Wolf’s use.

At 5:05 p.m., according to one witness, Wolf’s middle man got a phone call from the mystery man, that the candidate in Alameda (Hertle) didn’t make it, that they were not funding only one candidate, but that they were going to fund two candidates. He said Hertle hadn’t filed and that she didn’t have enough signatures.

He lied.

The middle man who was holding the check for Wolf’s filing fees, took the check back from the clerk’s window and walked out.

Nyna Armstrong, Chairman of the Contra Costa County Republican Party then told Wolf her organization would pay his filing fee.

Someone really discouraged Wolf, telling him, he’d look like a fool and get beaten bad. So, Wolf didn’t complete the filing and he turned and walked out the door of the Elections Office, as well.

What Wolf’s team and Meuser didn’t know was that Hertle had more than enough signatures to qualify. So, Wolf was talked out of it, based on a lie.

Meuser says he would have turned around and paid his filing fee and filed, had someone called him about what happened, as he was driving away.

Hertle refuses to talk to Republican leaders or media

After she became the only Republican candidate to file her papers, Hertle was called by a variety of Republican leaders offering their assistance. She was also contacted by the media, including the Herald, several times via email, phone calls, texts and Facebook messages. But, she has refused to respond to any messages.

Glazer campaign announces Hertle’s withdrawal

Then, on Monday, February 2 at 12:29 p.m., in a press release received via email, Glazer’s campaign announced Hertle’s withdrawal from the race.

With Hertle resigning from the race, Glazer faces three other Democratic opponents on the special election ballot. The primary election will be held March 17.

‘I’m grateful for Michaela’s support. We both understand that we are Californians first and are committed to putting aside partisan politics for the common good,’ said Glazer.  ‘She shares my commitment to bi-partisan problem solving, fiscal responsibility, pension and school reform, and a ban on debilitating BART strikes. Her inspirational leadership is a great example to our leaders in the state capitol.’”

Glazer serves as “a Trustee of the California State University 23-campus system. During his service on the City Council of Orinda, he has balanced ten budgets without ever taking a salary,” stated his campaign’s news release.

Glazer mailer Hertle quote 225x300 Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre arranged

One of the mailers supporting Glazer, paid for by Bill Bloomfield.

When reached for comment about whether he knew if Hertle’s actions were pre-arranged, Glazer stated firmly, “No. I met with her on Friday. We visited for the first time.”

I’ve been in this business for a while and people say all kinds of things,” he added.

When asked why he waited until the last day to file, Glazer responded, “I wanted to feel like there was a pathway forward for me.”

Asked if he was waiting in the parking lot at the Elections Office, he said “I was, yes.

Mark Meuser and I were chatting in the parking lot. We were lamenting that our party leaders weren’t happy with us,” Glazer added with a chuckle.

When asked if he had received calls from anyone in the State Senate Republican Caucus, he responded “That wouldn’t make sense. I’m a Democrat.”

I wasn’t recruited to run by anybody” he added.

Glazer says he took a big risk and endorsed Republican Catharine Baker in the General Election for last year’s Assembly race.

I did it because I thought it was the right thing to do,” he stated.

Now he’s being targeted by both the Democratic Party and unions, spending thousands on mailers attacking him. Glazer has posted copies of the nastygrams on his website at

Hertle’s official statement

Hertle, made her announcement via a post on her Facebook page, on Monday:

Concerning my candidacy for CA State Senate (SD7):

I entered the race for SD7 because I hoped to inspire a new generation of Republicans to rise up and be heard. We all discuss politics every day at our dinner tables and with our friends. We lament about how policies coming out of Sacramento affect our personal lives, our communities and our businesses, but so few are willing to do anything about it. I wanted to prove that one person can make a difference.

With this said, under the current circumstances, the chance of my winning this race is slim, at best. This is my first effort at seeking elected office. It has become evident that I cannot establish the funding, name recognition and support required to win this election against this field of Democratic candidates within a six-week period.

I am endorsing Steve Glazer for California State Senate District 7. Mr. Glazer has proven that he can work with Republicans and Democrats alike to find common sense solutions to our state’s needs. Like me, he is a fiscal conservative. He supports pension reform and school reform. He is not beholden to labor or other special interests, as seen by his opposition to BART strikes. I urge my fellow Republicans to vote for Steve Glazer. We have more commonalities with him than differences and he can win this race.

I look forward to future opportunities to serve and promote Republican ideals in California. I wish the best of luck to Mr. Steve Glazer. You can visit his website here

Michaela M. Hertle

Republican Party Candidate for SD7

Different people deal with Hertle, Wolf and possibly Glazer

It was learned this past week, that the person who wrote the check for Wolf’s filing fees came from someone who had no contact with Hertle.So, if there was someone in touch with Hertle and/or Glazer, whomever called and lied to Wolf’s middle man might be him.

Meuser blames Caucus staffer

So, who was the mystery man?

Meuser says it has to be Matt Klemin, External Affairs Director – Tribal Liaison for the California State Senate Republican Caucus, who is Republican State Senate Leader Bob Huff’s man.

He was calling people out of the California Republican Party’s Sacramento office,” Meuser said. “That’s because when he’s doing partisan political things, he can’t do it out of his Capitol office and has to go across the street to his office at the CRP office.”

The reason I know it was the state party office, is because I had to call Matt back at the number he left for me on the voicemail,” Meuser stated. “They answered ‘California Republican Party’ and I asked to be transferred to Matt. Then we spoke.”

Klemin told me ‘Mark, I see that you have not, yet filed your paperwork. When are you going to do so?,’” Meuser shared.

He then said to Klemin, “I see there are a couple other Republicans who have pulled papers and are gathering signatures, right this second and as such I may not file.”

Then according to Meuser, Klemin got real angry and said, “After your conversation with Brulte, today telling him you’re staying in the race, I have had to spend all day trying to get these candidates to get their paperwork together to get on the ballot. Why don’t you make up your mind, so I don’t have to waste my time.”

That made it appear to Meuser that Klemin was the one pulling the strings behind the scenes with the other potential Republican candidates.

Meuser said he told Klemin about Hertle’s candidacy during their conversation.

Republican Caucus denies responsibility, calls it “fantasy”

Peter DeMarco, of the State Senate Republican Caucus staff spoke on behalf of Huff and Klemin, who said he could not go on the record for this article.

DeMarco confirmed that Huff did speak with Meuser, but it was mostly staffers who were in touch with potential candidates, including Meuser and Wolf.

The strategy was to have two Republicans in the race, hoping both would make the run-off in the General Election, as that was viewed as the only way a Republican, who wasn’t well-known or well-funded, could win.

In 2014 the Senate Republicans won three elections in Democrat majority districts because we had the right, outstanding candidates who were the best fit for the districts,” DeMarco explained. “A well-known candidate who would be strong financially, and could appeal to Republicans and independents, based on the voter registration of the district,” was who they were looking for.

When the vacancy appeared to be opening in Senate District 7th, we had conversations with possible candidates and did research to find the best candidate who could win the special election. A variety of candidates we spoke to said they would not run,” he continued. “Meuser had expressed his intention to run. The conversation took place that he might not be the best candidate for the district and we continued to talk to other possible candidates. One of those was Leigh Wolf.”

Our goal has always been to elect Republicans to the Senate. Voters have supported Republicans in this area, in the past,” DeMarco shared. “But, as the filing deadline approached we concluded our conversations, spoke with both Meuser and Wolf and believed that they were both going to file. The best chance for winning the seat would have been with one Republican running.”

When asked if the Caucus was part of some strategy to get Glazer elected, DeMarco said “That is simply fantasy. We are in the business of electing Republicans.”

He said they had no conversation with Hertle.

The first time any of us had heard her name was Friday night, after she had filed,” he stated.

County Republican Party Treasurer also blames Caucus

Rohit Joy, Treasurer of the Contra Costa Republican Central Committee, shares Meuser’s view.

He said he does not know Hertle, personally, but heard she was one of the two Republican candidates recruited, because Meuser would not back out.

The Senate Republican Caucus recruited Wolf and Hertle,” he stated.

When asked how he knew that, Joy said that “staffers from the caucus were at the Contra Costa Elections Office on Friday afternoon,” the day filing closed. “I’ve spoken with people on our central committee who were at the office, that day,” Joy added. But, he was not there.

County Party Chair Nyna [Armstrong] was there at the Elections Office,” he offered.

Joy continued with his view of what occurred.

Meuser told me he thought it was the Caucus who were going to put up the two Republican candidates against him,” he stated. “There was an effort to clear the field of Republicans because they thought that Glazer would have a better chance getting elected.”

They’ll never admit to that because it goes against the CRP Bylaws and their mission, but I believe that to be the case,” Joy said.

When it was pointed out to Joy what DeMarco said, that they’d only recruited Wolf, he replied “But, if I see more evidence, then I’m open to changing my opinion. It could be the third house.”

She [Hertle] is the only one who can be blamed for the actions she’s taken,” Joy concluded.

County Republican Party won’t endorse

The Contra Costa Republican Party Central Committee will not be endorsing Glazer nor any other candidate in the race.

I’m livid,” is all Chairman Nyna Armstrong said, before going off the record until a later conversation, after she had met with her Executive Committee, that evening.

We are not going to endorse a Democrat, that is for sure,” Armstrong said later. “That was the decision of the Executive Committee.”

Following is the official statement from the Contra Costa GOP:

The Republican Party of Contra Costa County was in support of a candidate for the State Senate District 7. Unfortunately, this candidate chose to not run for the office at the last minute. Subsequently, Micheala Hertle of Pleasanton chose to file for the race; she is still on the ballot, but is not campaigning.

The Republican Party does not endorse any candidate in the race, but we remind Republicans that it is our duty and privilege to vote. We further advise our members to vote for the candidate who they feel best matches their personal beliefs and has the views they feel more closely reflects views held by the Republican Party.

Nyna Armstrong, Chairman

Republican Party of Contra Costa County”

Glazer mailer 225x300 Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre arranged

One of a variety of mailers supporting Glazer’s campaign paid for by Bill Bloomfield.

Pro-Glazer mailers tout Hertle endorsement, funded by Southern California millionaire

Three of six mailers sent to Republicans supporting the Glazer campaign, that arrived, in the past few weeks have touted Hertle’s exit from the race and her endorsement of his candidacy.

In the return address area of the mailers, it states “Paid for by Bill Bloomfield, Not authorized by a candidate or a committee controlled by a candidate,” then gives an address in “Manhattan Beach, CA.”

Bloomfield is currently acting Chairman of Baron Equities, a real estate investment firm with ownership and management interests in residential, commercial, retail and industrial properties in California and the U.S.

Between 2001 and 2011 he spent $2,231,000 to support candidates and ballot measures in California and spent over $7 million on his own failed Congressional race in 2012.

According to his website,, he was also a key player in creating California’s Citizen Redistricting Commission, which redrew the district boundaries in 2011, as well as the current Open Primary process where the top two candidates, regardless of political party, go on to compete in the General Election.

Bloomfield says he and his wife, Susan became familiar with Glazer, during his Assembly race, last year. In addition to the funds spent on the independent mailers, they have each contributed $4,200 to Glazer’s campaign.

Bloomfield address 225x300 Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre arrangedI didn’t know who the Republican candidates were,” Bloomfield said, recently. “We would have supported Glazer regardless of who else ran.”

Republican leaders endorse Glazer, Bill Baker knew of pre-filing maneuvering

Glazer has picked up the endorsements of former and current Republican leaders. The most suprising one is State Assemblywoman Catharine Baker, who was just elected, last November, who with Democrat Tim Sbranti, beat Glazer in last June’s Primary. In addition, former Congressman Bill Baker and State Senator Richard Rainey, both Republicans, as well as local elected Republicans including San Ramon City Councilman Dave Hudson, Danville Town Councilwoman Karen Stepper and Antioch’s own City Clerk Arne Simonsen, have endorsed Glazer.

When reached for comment about both his endorsement and whether he knew about the pre-filing manuevering to clear the race of Republican candidates, Baker said “I was aware of it but didn’t participate in it. Mark is a good guy and I like him. The reality is this is a 25% [Republican registration] district and unless someone who is very well known is willing to run, they’re not going to win. The facts are this is a very Democrat district.”

I’d rather take a chance getting a guy willing to reform education, reform the pensions, willing to be a fiscal conservative who doesn’t support the rail to nowhere and doesn’t support the underground peripheral canal,” he added.

Others blame another wealthy Republican

Charles Munger, Jr. is the wealthy son of billionaire Charles Munger, Sr., who is the partner of Warren Buffet, one of the two wealthiest Americans, along with Bill Gates. Munger, Jr. has been working to influence Republican primary elections in California for a few years, by financially supporting ballot measures and more moderate candidates with millions of dollars of his own money.

Just like Bloomfield, he supported Proposition 11 in 2008, which created the Citizens Redistricting Commission, then Munger, Jr. contributed over $12 million to help pass Proposition 20 in 2010, adding congressional districts to the commission’s responsibility.

In 2012, Munger contributed almost $29 million to the Small Business Action Committee which opposed Prop. 30, the Sales and Income Tax Increase Initiative, which passed, and supported Prop. 32, labeled the “Paycheck Protection” Initiative, which failed. That initiative would have banned corporate and union contributions to state and local candidates, contributions by government contractors to the politicians who control contracts awarded to them, and automatic deductions by corporations, unions, and government of employees’ wages to be used for politics.

He’s the former Chairman of the Santa Clara County Republican Party of Silicon Valley.

Others in the party believe Munger may be the mystery man.

That is partially due to Bussell’s help with Hertle’s filing, and his connection to Suzanne Caro, the immediate-past Chairman of the Alameda County Republican Party Central Committee, and their connection to Luis Buhler, an activist in the Republican Party in the Bay Area, who is considered Munger, Jr.’s right-hand man.

They also point to Glazer’s connection to the Jobs PAC, which is part of the California Chamber of Commerce, which they claim is funded by Munger.

When reached for comment about Hertle filing then withdrawing from the race, Caro said, “I just spent the weekend with her at the state Republican Convention.” She stated that Hertle said “Oh my. Everybody knows my name.”

Caro spoke at length about Hertle.

I met her the first time, when she was a Romney alternate delegate to the National Republican Convention in 2012. She’s a kind of under the radar, 34-year-old woman. A Mormon. She’s a two-time IT start-up company entrepreneur. She’s a solid citizen.”

I believe she’s feeling the heat from Republican sources, that she was being paid off, which isn’t what happened at all.”

Her concern was with Mark Meuser, his history with Tim Donnelly and he had a problem articulating his platform. Her initial motivation was to have a debate that was more serious with a Republican, on issues that voters cared more about. She got motivated to offer a different conversation. Because Republicans should have another choice, another angle on the issues.”

When asked why Hertle withdrew from the race, Caro stated, “She didn’t believe she would be the only Republican on the ballot. Some people got to her and said that they were going to be endorsing Glazer.”

She’s way more innocent than what is being talked about. Then she got real about how short the election cycle was, how tough her funding would be.”

She found out that Republicans in her own home town were going to endorse Glazer.”

Glazer reached out to her. When she heard his positions on the issues she agreed with many of them.”

When asked about Munger’s involvement, Caro replied, “I think Luis [Buhler] makes it appear that he’s more of a gatekeeper for Munger, than he is. I know Charles through Lincoln Club of Northern California. Munger had nothing to do with either Hertle running or withdrawing. He never spoke with her.”

Regarding Wolf and Hertle’s connection to him, Caro stated “She heard about Wolf but doesn’t know him. He was recruited to dilute the Republican vote.”

Regarding Meuser’s potential candidacy, Caro shared what she knew.

I told Mark that if he was the only candidate I would support him,” she stated.

The people who I think are really involved here, was a combination of – the legislative leaders tried to

talk Mark out of the race. “The Senate Caucus. Matt Klemin was in conversation with Mark Meuser to try to get him out of the race. Senator Huff called Mark and tried to get him out of the race.”

I am aware that the Third House and Cal Chamber were calling Mark and letting their feelings known.

No one was impressed with Mark, as he didn’t have a platform, just a strategy to win if he cleared the field.”

They told him ‘Your polling was in the toilet. We’ll work with you and help you run for local office and get you started in local office.’ They also told him ‘You need to polish up. You need to get your act together.’”

But, he refused to back out. He kept stalling and stalling and putting off the decision,” she added.

Hertle was a surprise. Michaela was an accidental situation in a way. But, it was a learning experience for her. She never thought she would be the only Republican on the ballot.

When told that someone lied to Wolf’s team about Hertle not having enough signatures, she responded, “How would they know? It’s different in Alameda County. She had to pay her filing fee, first, before she could start collecting signatures.”

Now everyone is twisting this to their advantage,” Caro said regarding Hertle’s withdrawal and endorsement of Glazer.

People in the business community don’t want either Bonilla or Buchanan to win so they’re going all out to help Glazer,” she added.

Regarding Catharine Baker’s endorsement of Glazer, Caro said, “Baker doesn’t want to run against Glazer in 2016. So, she’s willing to help him, this year. She’s in a position to support him. She knows she can work more easily with him than with Bonilla or Joan Buchanan.”

Party loyalty in the Bay Area is lower on the totem pole than where people come down on the issues,” she shared.

Regarding who lied to Wolf’s team, Caro responded, “My guess is it was out of Sacramento, the Third House, and I don’t know.”

When asked about Republicans just waiting until next year to field a candidate, Caro’s not sure if a Republican can win the seat in 2016. “Unless we had someone like [Contra Costa District Attorney] Mark Peterson,” she said.

Buhler didn’t return messages for this article.

But, a state party insider, who chose not to be identified, like Caro, stated flatly that Munger had nothing to do with clearing the field of Republican candidates in the special election.

Further evidence is that none of the mailers supporting Glazer have been from Munger or the Small Business Action Committee, nor have their been any contributions to Glazer’s campaign from Munger.

Glazer says he wasn’t recruited, no Munger connection

When asked why he waited until the last day to file, Glazer responded, “I wanted to feel like there was a pathway forward for me.”

Asked if he was waiting in the parking lot at the Elections Office, he said “I was, yes.

Mark Meuser and I were chatting in the parking lot. We were lamenting that our party leaders weren’t happy with us,” Glazer added with a chuckle.

When asked if he had received calls from anyone in the State Senate Republican Caucus, he responded “That wouldn’t make sense. I’m a Democrat.”

I wasn’t recruited to run by anybody” he added.

He endorsed Catharine Baker in the General Election. I did it because I thought it was the right thing to do.

He admitted he had been a consultant to the Jobs PAC, which describes itself in campaign finance reports as “A coalition of California employers supporting pro-business candidates, since 1992.”

Glazer also said “I may have met Charles Munger, Jr. But, he has nothing to do with Jobs PAC.”

While he was working with the Jobs PAC, they worked against two incumbent Democrats. Because of that, the State Labor Federation put him on their “do not patronize” list, Glazer stated, which means no one was to do business with him nor support him for office.

Now they’re pulling out all the stops to defeat him with a variety of mailers. The nasty-grams can be viewed on his website at

Who paid Hertle’s filing fee?

One way to possibly discover who, if anyone, was pulling the strings with Hertle is to find out who paid her filing fee of $971.97 to the California Secretary of State.

That office has not responded to a call asking the question of whose name was on the check.

Since Hertle isn’t talking and the fee was less than the $1,000 threshold to meet the requirements for campaign disclosure, Hertle never has to file a campaign finance report.

So, we may never know who paid her fee.

But, although she paid the filing fee, Hertle didn’t pay to have a candidate statement in the ballot materials, which is the lowest cost way for a candidate to get their message to all the voters. So, that makes it obvious she had no plans to run a serious campaign, or stay in the race.

Hertle’s endorsement carries little weight

The fact that the “lone Republican” dropped out of the race and has endorsed Glazer seems to be the main point his campaign is hammering home with Republican voters.

But, Hertle’s endorsement means nothing, and carries no weight.

She didn’t raise any money nor had she even started to campaign before dropping out. Plus, her name will be on the ballot so those who don’t get Glazer’s message or want to file a protest vote can still vote for her.

Republican Party activists consider her a no-name in both the party and politics in general, with no campaign or public office experience and still is, having merely filed some papers, paid a fee with some mystery man’s money, then posted a message on her Facebook page that she decided not to run and support Glazer.

As one person from one of the campaigns of a Republican candidate who didn’t file, and who chose not to be identified, stated, “It couldn’t be more transparent. The fact that she filed, then a week later drops out without even appearing at a campaign event or talking to the media, then to have the mailer show up, confirmed that this was all prearranged.”

District 7 winnable by a Republican

The Democrat candidate who wins this yearwill face election for a full term next year, that could possibly include facing a Republican candidate, giving the voters a choice between candidates from the two major parties.

Based on the voter registration in the district, according to both local and Sacramento-based campaign experts, it is winnable by a Republican candidate, if they’re well-known, a strong campaigner and can raise the needed funds.

The actual percentages of registered voters by party in the 7th State Senate District as of the November, 2014 election were as follows: Democrats 43.5%, Republicans 28.6%, No Party Preference 22.2%, Other, minor parties 5.9%

According to experts, any time a district is less than 50% Democrat it’s winnable by a strong Republican candidate. Plus, since many of the Democrats in the district lean conservative and are not strong, pro-union supporters, a Republican candidate starts off with over 40% of the vote. Adding to that, support from those with No Party Preference and a Republican candidate could win.

Republicans will be recruiting a candidate for next year

Sources inside the party say they will be looking to recruit a strong Republican candidate to run next year, against whichever candidate wins, this year. But, others are concerned that in a presidential election year, with more Democrats turning out to vote, it will be more difficult for a Republican to win and beat an incumbent Democrat. So, they’re backing Glazer, this year.

Mystery man still unidentified

While it appears some mystery man was pulling strings to clear the field of Republican candidates and help Glazer win, after multiple conversations and three weeks of research, we don’t know, yet who he is.

We also don’t know who paid Hertle’s filing fee. She’s not talking.

However, we do know a few things:

First, we know that mystery man lied to Wolf’s team about Hertle’s signatures.

We know that Wolf was talked out of the race and that Meuser was pressured out of the race, both on the final day of filing.

We know Glazer waited until the last day to file.

We know that Hertle filed, then withdrew without every campaigning, and endorsed Glazer, when she could have just withdrawn and not made an endorsement, and refuses to speak to the media about it.

We also know she did the minimum required to become a candidate by merely paying the filing fee, but not for the low-cost ballot statement. So, she was never planning on being a serious candidate or staying in the race.

Finally, we also know that Bill Bloomfield, a wealthy, Southern California business man, who is a disgruntled, former Republican, and failed Congressional candidate, is trying to influence the special election in Contra Costa and Alameda Counties and help Glazer get elected.

Navarro may still run

In a brief conversation on Saturday, February 28, Fernando Navarro, the man from Antioch, said he still may run as a write-in candidate.

If so, he has until Tuesday, March 3 to file as a write-in candidate in the race. If he does, it could upset the Glazer victory strategy – whose ever it was – for this election, now a little more than two weeks away.

NOTE: This article was begun the day Hertle dropped out of the race. But, it has taken this long for the complete investigation and to get people to speak on the record.

Share this:
email Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre arranged su Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre arranged digg Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre arranged fb Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre arranged twitter Analysis: Lone Republican in 7th State Senate special election drops out, endorses Democrat, appears pre arranged

McNerney issues statement supporting Thursday’s FCC internet regulation vote

Friday, February 27th, 2015

By Allen Payton

Congressman Jerry McNerney (CA-09) who represnts most of Antioch, issued the following statement after today’s Federal Communications Commission vote to adopt new rules concerning broadband access in the U.S.:

“Today, the FCC took a historic step in voting to protect the internet as we know it. Reliable broadband access is essential for the future of commerce, education, and innovation in this country. The FCC clearly took into account the more than four million public comments they received in advance of their decision.

“Today’s vote is an important step in an ongoing process to keep the internet as open for innovation and economic growth as possible. The FCC is responsible for providing the framework for internet communications, and I look forward to the release of the order. I will continue to work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to ensure that we empower consumers and businesses as technologies change and advance.”

According to a Huffington Post article about the FCC’s vote, three of the five members of the commision voted “to approve a rule that reclassifies consumer broadband as a utility under Title II of the Communications Act. The FCC intends to use this new authority to ban ‘paid prioritization,’ a practice whereby Internet service providers can charge content producers a premium for giving users more reliable access to that content, as well as to ban blocking and throttling of lawful content and services. These rules also apply to mobile access.”

The complete, official news release from the FCC about the ruling can be viewed here.

Share this:
email McNerney issues statement supporting Thursdays FCC internet regulation vote su McNerney issues statement supporting Thursdays FCC internet regulation vote digg McNerney issues statement supporting Thursdays FCC internet regulation vote fb McNerney issues statement supporting Thursdays FCC internet regulation vote twitter McNerney issues statement supporting Thursdays FCC internet regulation vote

Highway 4 to go hi-tech

Thursday, February 26th, 2015

CCTA receives federal grant to plan new Technologies for a multi-modal transportation corridor on Highway 4

The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), and U.S. Reps. Mike Thompson (CA-5) and Jerry McNerney (CA-9) today announced that a $200,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation was received to begin planning for an Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) program on Highway 4. The ICM program will build upon the work that’s already been done to improve the Highway 4 corridor and demonstrates CCTA’s commitment to finding innovative solutions to smooth traffic and help Contra Costa residents get where they need to go safely and efficiently. 

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) authorized the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to encourage Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) deployment on the national highway system through demonstrations and grant programs. The purpose of this program is to promote the integrated management and operations of the transportation system. CCTA has been awarded the grant to support planning for a multimodal transportation corridor along Highway 4.

“These funds will allow us to implement new technology to help lessen congestion on the I-80 corridor to the entire 31-mile length of Highway 4,” said Congressman Mike Thompson. “Commutes will be made safer and easier, and our region will be even more attractive to residents and new businesses. I am proud to have worked with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority to secure this important grant.”

“The Contra Costa Transportation Authority, along with other agencies, have already invested over a billion dollars of mostly local and state funds to improve the heavily used SR-4 corridor. I am glad to support agency’s hard work and innovation by working with them to bring home this grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation. This grant funding will be used to reduce congestion and keep travelers informed of any delays.”

CCTA and its partner agencies have invested $1.3 billion to expand capacity on Highway 4, improve local connections to the highway, and to extend BART from Pittsburg/Bay Point to Hillcrest Avenue. This investment will dramatically improve the performance of the highway and parallel and connecting arterials, and adds a new transit option (eBART), HOV and HOT opportunities, along with facilitating increased local transit options. The improvements on the Highway 4 corridor are expected to be completed by early 2016; eBART is expected to begin revenue service in 2017.

The Integrated Corridor Management program is the next evolution of improvements along this busy corridor, and will preserve the mobility benefits gained by the Highway 4 widening and eBART project for decades to come.

“This ICM project redefines mobility in the 21st century,” said CCTA Board Chair Julie Pierce. “The Contra Costa Transportation Authority is committed to just this kind of innovation, as seen recently with the launch of our GoMentum Station Connected Vehicle/Autonomous Vehicle (CV/AV) program. In the span of 20 years, we’re working to take Highway 4 from the worst commute in Contra Costa to the best commute through our strategic investments and management of this corridor.”

CCTA, in collaboration with Caltrans District 4 (Oakland), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), local cities, and transit agencies in Contra Costa County, has developed a Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) to implement the Integrated Corridor Mobility solution along the Highway 4 corridor. The program will integrate several innovative key operational strategies for the freeway, ramps, local arterials, and transit to mitigate congestion and better manage traffic flow throughout the corridor. CCTA and its partners will utilize the lessons learned from implementations in San Diego and Dallas as well as the I-80 ICM programs being implemented in Alameda and Contra Costa counties.

About The Contra Costa Transportation Authority

The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is a public agency formed by Contra Costa voters in 1988 to manage the county’s transportation sales tax program and oversee countywide transportation planning efforts.  CCTA is responsible for planning, funding and delivering critical transportation infrastructure projects and programs that connect our communities, foster a strong economy, increase sustainability, and safely and efficiently get people where they need to go. CCTA also serves as the county’s designated Congestion Management Agency, responsible for putting programs in place to keep traffic levels manageable. More information about CCTA can be found online at

Share this:
email Highway 4 to go hi tech su Highway 4 to go hi tech digg Highway 4 to go hi tech fb Highway 4 to go hi tech twitter Highway 4 to go hi tech

Register to vote by March 2 to vote in March 17 special State Senate election

Tuesday, February 24th, 2015

County Clerk-Recorder and Registrar of Voters, Joseph E. Canciamilla, announces that Monday, March 2, 2015 is the voter registration deadline for the March 17, 2015 7th State Senatorial District Special Primary Election. New voters must register and anyone who has moved or has had a name change must re-register.

Voters may register online at Voters may also obtain registration forms at government offices including City or County Offices and DMV locations. The completed form must be delivered to the Contra Costa County Elections Office at 555 Escobar Street in Martinez no later than 5:00 pm on March 2, 2015, or be postmarked by March 2, 2015.

To be eligible to vote, a person must be a U.S. citizen who will be at least 18 years old by March 17, 2015 and not imprisoned or on parole for the conviction of a felony. Anyone who becomes a newly naturalized citizen after the March 2, 2015 deadline may register and vote between March 3 and March 17, 2015. New citizens may register at the Contra Costa County Elections Office at 555 Escobar Street in Martinez and must present his or her Certificate of Naturalization.

Share this:
email Register to vote by March 2 to vote in March 17 special State Senate election su Register to vote by March 2 to vote in March 17 special State Senate election digg Register to vote by March 2 to vote in March 17 special State Senate election fb Register to vote by March 2 to vote in March 17 special State Senate election twitter Register to vote by March 2 to vote in March 17 special State Senate election

Antioch indoor soccer business gets approval from Planning Commission

Saturday, February 21st, 2015

By Allen Payton

The Antioch Planning Commission, on Wednesday, February 18, on a minimally required 4-0 vote, gave the green light for a new indoor soccer business in a building on West 10th Street that was the former location of an auto painting business.

Ruben Herrera of East Bay Indoor Soccer, requested approval of a Use Permit to establish and operate an indoor soccer facility, including soccer fields, seating area, offices, and a reception area in the 16,000 square foot building. There will be no exterior modifications to the building, other than painting and front landscaping. The project site is located at 1825 W. 10th Street, across from Hazel’s Drive-In.

Commissioners addressed a few issues. There will be no on-site preparation or sale of food, other than snacks.

For proper traffic flow into and out of the parking lot, one of the two driveways will be used as

But, the main issue was parking. The site contains 41 parking spaces.

So, although there will be two soccer fields inside, only one game will be played at a time and the games will be 45 minutes apart so there will be no overcrowding of the parking lot.

Antioch resident Karl Dietzel spoke at the meeting and suggested they do advertising through the schools. Dietzel later said that the business owner liked his idea.

The commission determined that the use fits within the business park designation for the site.

The hours of operation of the facility will be from 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM.

Share this:
email Antioch indoor soccer business gets approval from Planning Commission su Antioch indoor soccer business gets approval from Planning Commission digg Antioch indoor soccer business gets approval from Planning Commission fb Antioch indoor soccer business gets approval from Planning Commission twitter Antioch indoor soccer business gets approval from Planning Commission

Assemblyman Frazier announces schedule for aquatic weed abatement in the delta

Wednesday, February 18th, 2015

Sacramento, CA – Waterways in Contra Costa County will be among the first to be treated for aquatic weeds this year, said Assemblymember Jim Frazier, D-Oakley, commenting on the California Division of Boating and Waterways treatment schedule released Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2015.

Rock Slough, Indian Slough, Coney Island and the San Joaquin River will be among the first locations where herbicides will be used to treat Water Hyacinth and Spongeplant, beginning March 4.

For over a year, I have held meetings, co-authored legislation, supported augmenting the budget, and worked closely with the division to ensure that my constituents receive the services necessary to maintain a quality of life on the Delta,” said Frazier.

Extreme drought, record-high temperatures and low water flows have caused warmer areas of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to become choked with aquatic weeds.

DBW has permission to treat 3,500 acres of Water Hyacinth in the Delta between now and Nov. 30. In addition to the Contra Costa sites, it will begin by treating San Joaquin County areas including Middle River, Whiskey Slough, Old River and the Tuolumne River. On June 1, the state will expand the herbicide treatment to other Delta areas.

In addition, DBW is continuing to conduct mechanical harvesting of Water Hyacinth in the Old River area of the South Delta and around Stockton on an as-needed-basis. The Division will also begin treating Egeria densa and curly-leaf pondweed in early March; that schedule will be made public next week.

I want to thank everyone who contacted my office,” Frazier said. “Our voice played a critical role in securing these resources. It is very important that we continue to provide feedback to DBW so that the agency can better assess infested areas for further treatment.”

Sightings of aquatic weeds and infestations can be reported by calling 1-888-326-2822 or emailing

For more on the DBW treatment schedule, click here.

To contact Assemblymember Jim Frazier please visit his website at or call his District Offices at 707-399-3011 or 925-778-5790.

Follow Assemblymember Jim Frazier on Facebook and “Like” him for updates on events and happenings in the 11th AD by clicking here

Share this:
email Assemblyman Frazier announces schedule for aquatic weed abatement in the delta su Assemblyman Frazier announces schedule for aquatic weed abatement in the delta digg Assemblyman Frazier announces schedule for aquatic weed abatement in the delta fb Assemblyman Frazier announces schedule for aquatic weed abatement in the delta twitter Assemblyman Frazier announces schedule for aquatic weed abatement in the delta

Public outcry defeats proposal for majority vote to place items on Antioch Council agenda

Sunday, February 15th, 2015

Council members respond by proposing items for future meeting agendas

By John Crowder

At the February 10, 2015, meeting of the Antioch City Council, outrage from local residents over City Manager Steve Duran’s proposal to prevent council members from placing items on future agendas without a majority of the council members voting to do so resulted in the abandonment of the practice. Instead, a motion by recently elected Mayor Pro Tem Lori Ogorchock that allows every council member to see their ideas placed on a future agenda passed on a 5-0 vote.

The procedure being used to place items on the agenda during city council meetings came under scrutiny following their January 13 meeting. During council comments at that meeting, Ogorchock noted that over $400,000 in Measure O funds were available because increased property tax revenue had allowed for the return of city staff to a 40-hour work week. She then asked that an item be placed on the agenda to discuss the hiring of additional Community Service Officers (CSO’s). However, Duran and Mayor Wade Harper told her she was not able to place items on the agenda without a consensus of the council (see article, Antioch Council Meeting: Of Card Rooms, Cats And Community Service Officers, here).

Following the meeting, a series of editorials in the Antioch Herald shined a spotlight on the practice, apparently implemented under Harper, to not place suggested items on future agendas unless at least three council members, “nodded in consent.” Herald publisher Allen Payton, who had served on the city council in the late 1990′s, soundly criticized the practice (see Payton Perspective columns of January 27th, February 6th and 11th). His criticism was shared by Antioch residents posting comments to his columns, on-line.

With criticism rapidly mounting, Duran commissioned city staff to conduct a survey of the method used by other cites and agencies in Contra Costa County. This survey was to lend support to an item he and Harper agreed to place on the agenda at the February 10 council meeting requiring a majority vote to have an item placed on future city council agendas. This set the stage for the confrontation over the issue at the February 10 meeting.

When the agenda item, the last of the night, was reached, Duran began a lengthy defense of the idea, stating that, “there’s a lot of misunderstanding bantering about over the Internet waves regarding what this council has been doing in terms of how council members place things on the agenda. The practice since I’ve been here, and from what my staff tells me from long before, is the practice has been at a council meeting any council member can propose to have an item placed on a future agenda, and by consensus, or if there is no consensus, then a vote of the majority of the council would place that on a future agenda.”

Calling the idea that his proposal was not the usual manner of conducting business, “ludicrous,” Duran then discussed how the survey he had directed staff member Michelle Fitzer, Administrative Services Director, to undertake supported the staff recommendation of requiring a vote.

In the vast majority of cases a majority vote of the council [is required] to place something on the agenda,” he said. “So, I just wanted to set the record as to what the facts are…”

Council members were then asked by Harper to pose questions to staff, and Ogorchock pointedly asked City Attorney Lynn Tracy Nerland, “A consensus nod, is that a valid vote?” Nerland responded by saying, “I think what you’re hearing from the city manager is since the question been raised that, then perhaps to ensure that there’s no misunderstanding that a vote might be the best approach in the future.”

Public comments followed, and it quickly became apparent that public sentiment was overwhelmingly opposed to Duran’s proposal. City Clerk Arne Simonsen referred the mayor and council members to a stack of fifteen emails that had been received regarding the item. Every one of them was opposed to the majority vote proposal.

In the emails, Mary Fletcher called the idea “not only unfair, but unethical.” Lee Ballesteros said that, “It will remove the representative aspect of our council members.” Ralph Garrow, Jr., said, “I strongly recommend that you abandon this ill-conceived attempt to quash possibly dissenting viewpoints,” and, “This proposal smacks of repressive government.” Joe Ramus suggested the proposal might be, “a violation of the Brown Act [open meeting law].” The remainder of the emails expressed similar views.

Several Antioch residents rose to speak on the matter. All were opposed to Duran’s proposal. Don Bright gave one of the most impassioned statements.

As a veteran, I have a strong sense of loyalty to the ideals of democracy and our representative form of government,” he said. “In my view it is an affront to our freedom of speech as each council member is a representative of the people.”

He went on to call the proposal, “a thinly veiled effort to silence the voices of the citizenry.”

Other speakers included George Briggs, who said that two previous mayors had said a majority had never been required to put an item on the agenda. Fred Hoskins, calling Ogorchock, “a breath of fresh air in this city,” said the staff report in support of the proposal was, “gibberish.” He went on to say that all council members were empowered to put an item on the agenda.

The bottom line is this. None of you up there should have less power as an individual elected representative than any one staff member,” Payton stated. “For 28 years, prior to this mayor being elected mayor, the practice has always been any council member can have any agenda item placed on the agenda.”

Julie Young said, “This is not representative government. Each of you was elected to represent the people. This is what our Constitution provides…a representative government.”

With public comments concluded, the council members weighed in on the matter. Council Member Tony Tiscareno said that any council member should have the right to put an item on the agenda as long as they didn’t “go rogue.” Council Member Mary Rocha said, “I believe we all have the right to put something on the agenda.” She said, “We don’t want to stifle anybody.” Council Member Monica Wilson said, “I don’t support the three votes, it seems that it kind of stifles our community.”

Ogorchock, referencing Duran’s proposal, gave a strongly-worded statement in opposition to the idea.

If we, as a council consider adopting this change we will not be able to judiciously add to the agenda for our constituents in a timely manner. We will have given up our rights and our privileges to participate and function as a governing board. I would be forfeiting my right to speak out for our constituents, with their concerns and ideas, but instead must now vie for votes just to add the items to the agenda.”

Ogorchock continued, “Do we as a city truly want to block what our constituents and elected council members want on an agenda, and thus available for open discussion and public review? I think not. Any individual council member should not have less power and authority than a member of the city staff. If staff can place any item on the agenda, so should we as council members.”

Directly addressing the survey undertaken by Fitzer, Ogorchock said, “I believe we should be the leaders for our neighboring cities, and not followers on how they may, or may not, be running their meetings.”

Harper then commented, and after an exchange with Duran, said, “I want to apologize to Lori [Ogorchock] if I made you feel like I didn’t want you to be heard. That is not the intent. It doesn’t matter if I agree or not, that is not the point.”

I think we work well together as a council when we hear all the ideas,” he added.

Following other comments by council members, Ogorchock, noting that, “a consensus nod is not a vote,” made a motion to allow each council member to have the power to place any item on a future council agenda. The mayor and city manager would then need to place the item on an upcoming agenda within six months. The motion was seconded by Rocha. The motion passed on a 5-0 vote. It also included adding language of “Future Agenda Items” to the Council Communications agenda item.

As the meeting drew to a close, the effects of the vote became readily apparent, as four of the council members directed that staff place specific items on future agendas. Rocha, in making a request that a presentation by the Rivertown group that has been advocating for a downtown event center for several months be placed on the agenda, said she was, “Using the new method that was just decided.”

Ogorchock, returning to the item that she had originally proposed on January 13, 2015, said that she wanted the hiring of additional CSO’s placed on the agenda. Wilson asked that the discussion of a youth commission and another item involving the use of solar power be added to future agendas. Harper said he wanted to look into changing the name of L Street to Marina Boulevard.

The entire city council meeting can be viewed online at the city website, The next meeting of the Antioch City Council is scheduled for Tuesday, February 24 at 7:00 p.m.

Share this:
email Public outcry defeats proposal for majority vote to place items on Antioch Council agenda su Public outcry defeats proposal for majority vote to place items on Antioch Council agenda digg Public outcry defeats proposal for majority vote to place items on Antioch Council agenda fb Public outcry defeats proposal for majority vote to place items on Antioch Council agenda twitter Public outcry defeats proposal for majority vote to place items on Antioch Council agenda

Antioch Mayor Harper responds to revived recall attempt, supporters can begin gathering signatures

Saturday, February 14th, 2015

By Allen Payton

As part of the recall process, Antioch Mayor Wade Harper had the opportunity to respond to the claims of the recall supporters.

Following is his official response to the Notice of Intention to Circulate Recall Petition, with which he was served at the City Council meeting on January 13, 2015.

As your Mayor and retired Police Lieutenant, reducing crime continues to be my top priority. Our families deserve to feel safe, that’s why I led the effort to approve Measure C – so Antioch would have the funds to hire more police officers. Our community united and we hired 10 new officers, which I personally swore in (Officers Mike Perez, Kyle Smith, J.B. Hulleman, Marcos Torres, Kenneth Krein, Scott Duggar, Amel Sahnic, Trak Keo-Vann, Ben Padilla and Matt Allendorph). We take pride in hiring the finest crime fighting officers. Aggressive hiring will continue. The cost of this recall may be up to $198,994.50 which could fund another 2 police officers. Under my leadership, Antioch has secured another $625,000 to hire 5 additional officers and our Police Department conducts weekly crime suppression operations – one of which resulted in 87 arrests in just a five-day period. Nothing is more important than keeping our neighborhoods and children safe. But to achieve that goal, it’s going to take all of us working together. We ended work furloughs city-wide and I believe great days are ahead. I respectfully ask that we unite as one community, to reject this recall, so we can continue this fight together.”

According to recall leader Rich Buongiorno, recall supporters were given the green light on Monday, February 9 to begin gathering the needed approximate 8,900 valid signatures of Antioch voters. They have 120 days to do so, in order to place the recall on the ballot. Should that occur, the election will be held some time later, this year.

The election will have two parts. The first will be a yes or no vote on recalling Harper. The second will be an election for a replacement candidate. Should Harper be recalled, the top vote-getter in the second part of the election will take his place as Mayor for the remainder of the term, through 2016.

Share this:
email Antioch Mayor Harper responds to revived recall attempt, supporters can begin gathering signatures su Antioch Mayor Harper responds to revived recall attempt, supporters can begin gathering signatures digg Antioch Mayor Harper responds to revived recall attempt, supporters can begin gathering signatures fb Antioch Mayor Harper responds to revived recall attempt, supporters can begin gathering signatures twitter Antioch Mayor Harper responds to revived recall attempt, supporters can begin gathering signatures