Sen. Glazer questions BART providing $1,000 bonuses, despite being billions in debt

Walnut Creek, CA – BART is in a financial crisis with capital needs estimated at $9.6 billion, yet it gave out $1,000 bonuses to the transit system’s 3,357 employees, as reported in today’s San Francisco Chronicle’s “Matier and Ross” column.

The 2013 employee contract tied the bonuses to ridership numbers. It is likely that additional $1,000 bonuses will be given again on July 1, 2016.

“This is an outrageous giveaway of taxpayer money by a transit system that is billions of dollars in capital debt,” said State Senator Steve Glazer (D – 7th District). “This secret bonus is on top of the 15.4% raises that BART gave to all workers and managers in its last contract.”

“Moreover, these bonuses aren’t tied to any performance metrics – which is probably obvious to all riders, given the packed and dirty trains, maintenance breakdowns and constant delays,” he continued. “And, they came from an agency that claims it has no money for new trains, track upgrades and technology improvements.

“BART continues to pay out millions of dollars in pay and benefits from one pocket, while claiming that it has no money for system improvements in the other pocket,” Glazer added.

Sen. Glazer, Assemblywoman Catharine Baker, and 38 local Supervisors, Mayors, and Council members recently wrote a letter to the BART Board of Directors and employee unions raising strong concerns about a potential multi-billion dollar bond that the Board is considering for the November 2016 ballot. The letter noted that convincing two-thirds of Bay Area voters is already an uphill fight, but the 2013 strike by BART unions, drawn-out contract negotiations, and wage concessions for workers and management also seriously damaged voters’ trust in BART.

To regain that trust and the voters’ support of new taxes, Sen. Glazer and the other signers implored the BART Board and employee unions to negotiate – before the 2016 elections – a new contract that will take into account the dire fiscal needs of the system and ensure that trains keep running on schedule. The new contract would come into effect after the existing contract sunsets in 2017.

The 7th State Senate District includes Antioch and most of Contra Costa County.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

2 Comments to “Sen. Glazer questions BART providing $1,000 bonuses, despite being billions in debt”

  1. Amigo Santa says:

    Really? It was “secret” but fully disclosed in the contract and tied to a performance number? What’s wrong with that? Don’t like it, don’t sign the contract.

    On the other hand, 3.5 million dollars is a mere 0.1% of the necessary $3 billion necessary for renovations.

    • Santa Amigo says:

      Yes, the recurring bonus is tied to a “performance number” but the improved “performance” isn’t by BART employees, but by the BART riders. Yet BART employees will get their bonuses every year, until lack of funding for maintenance and parts leads to system failures that lead to a reduction in ridership. True bonuses are incentives to improve quality. This one has the opposite effect.

Leave a Reply

semipurposive-sprang